• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

With Star Trek's success, what comes next?

No offense to Battlestar Galactica fans out there, but a very selfish part of me makes me want them to make it into a movie that thoroughly sucks.

I have nothing against the series. My gripe is with this friend of mine that I took to see Star Trek. She is an avid fan of B:G (she said she cried at the end of the finale, which she describes as the greatest TV finale of all time), and so I figured that, unlike many people I know, she would be able to appreciate Star Trek if it was good (which it of course turned out to be).

Well, the thing is, she had this annoyingly snide attitude about Trek. I told her beforehand that it had gotten great reviews on RT, and she (clearly not understanding that RT features critics reviews from multiple sources) replied that "oh, well, probably half the people that work for rottentomatoes are Star Trek nerds so of course they'd give it a great review." When I explained to her that RT simply collects reviews from multiple critics, she made some smartass comment about "What do critics know?"

Anyway, we go and see the movie, and though I can tell she's enjoying it, she has to continue making little smartass comments through the whole thing because she's oh-so-above-it-all. Afterward, we discussed the movie and she said she liked it, but the only thing that really impressed her was apparently Simon Pegg because she loves guys from the UK or whatever.

Now don't get me wrong... she remains a close friend, but this really grated on my nerves. If you're a huge fan of Battlestar Galactica (and also Firefly, which she is) I'm not saying that you have to love Star Trek too, but you should be willing to give it a chance. At the very least, don't act like you're above its nerdiness because you're clearly not. B:G and Firefly are just as dweeb-friendly as Trek is, if not moreso. And in the case of Firefly... at least the majority of people in this world have HEARD of Trek.
 
i think she already made up her mind prior to the release of the movie.
 
i think she already made up her mind prior to the release of the movie.

Very true.

You know what else is true?

I've met types like her in real life and it makes me want to strangle them. Stuck up, ignorant ***** describes them perfectly.
 
the one thing that makes a person 'cultured' is an open mind. I don't know this girl, but I think she needs to travel, do new things, in order to appreciates certain things in life. Even movies: watch old movies and foreign films can open your horizon a little bit.
 
the one thing that makes a person 'cultured' is an open mind. I don't know this girl, but I think she needs to travel, do new things, in order to appreciates certain things in life. Even movies: watch old movies and foreign films can open your horizon a little bit.[/quote]
QFT.
 
Star Wars sequels will come....someday. Only a fool would believe otherwise.


I want a Metroid film.
 
Now don't get me wrong... she remains a close friend, but this really grated on my nerves. If you're a huge fan of Battlestar Galactica (and also Firefly, which she is) I'm not saying that you have to love Star Trek too, but you should be willing to give it a chance. At the very least, don't act like you're above its nerdiness because you're clearly not. B:G and Firefly are just as dweeb-friendly as Trek is, if not moreso. And in the case of Firefly... at least the majority of people in this world have HEARD of Trek.

I love the Battlestar Galactica reboot....I love Firefly....and I love Trek...too bad your friend can't take it on in too.
 
That saddens me. I had high hopes for a cool Buck Rodgers movie being made sometime....but now I don't see it happening.

Someone seriously needs to go up to Frank Miller, look him in the eyes and say "You're just not good anymore" and walk away. Frank Miller's Buck Rogers is going to be, like, the most terrible thing I've ever laid eyes on.
 
I don't understand why anyone would give Miller any money to make another film after the spirit.
 
Peter Jackson produced "District 9" this year will also be a good sci-fi movie it seems.
 
Even though people didn't like the movie, I have really fond memories of it.

I used to be hooked to the screen when reruns of the show came on, and when I found out a new movie was coming out I freaked. I had the toys and everything. I was out of town when the movie came out but my parents took me to a showing during a thunderstorm they knew I wanted to see it so bad.

And for a 9 year old that was the coolest movie ever. I was really hurt they never made part 2.
 
the one thing that makes a person 'cultured' is an open mind. I don't know this girl, but I think she needs to travel, do new things, in order to appreciates certain things in life. Even movies: watch old movies and foreign films can open your horizon a little bit.

So very true. I agree with everything you guys said. It's true, sometimes you can see one preview of a movie and know that it's going to suck (G.I. Joe) but when something looks like it could be promising (based on trailers, reviews, buzz) then why not give it a shot? Especially if its based in a genre that you're a fan of.

For example, I'm not a particularly big Thor fan. But a movie is apparently on the way, and it's in the very capable hands of director Kenneth Branaugh. If the buzz on that film starts to really build, the reviews are good, and if it looks good in the trailer, you can bet your ass I'll be there to see it because I love potentially good superhero movies.
 
What happened after the successes of Saving Private Ryan, Gladiator, Spider-Man and Lord of the Rings?

You show Hollywood a new subgenre that can make money and they will duplicate. Or if you show one male subspecies of hare to its opposite counterpoint you are going to have a **** load of bunnies. And by bunnies I mean stupid movies.

And yes, I suspect we will see a lot of sci-fi, including the inevitable Battlestar Galactica(sp?) film.
 
What happened after the successes of Saving Private Ryan, Gladiator, Spider-Man and Lord of the Rings?

You show Hollywood a new subgenre that can make money and they will duplicate. Or if you show one male subspecies of hare to its opposite counterpoint you are going to have a **** load of bunnies. And by bunnies I mean stupid movies.

And yes, I suspect we will see a lot of sci-fi, including the inevitable Battlestar Galactica(sp?) film.

Other than "Troy" I really don't remember any movies that were trying to get the "Gladiator" audience. Where are the "Lord of the Rings" type of movies? And was there really an increase in war movies after "Saving Private Ryan". Maybe a couple of new movies were greenlit from those movies but "Spider-Man" was the only of those movies that really created a demand for more movies like it.
 
****. I know the last post was flippant but if this could be parlayed into some way of us getting another Serenity movie...a sequel with a big new name to trick people (like those who saw Serenity not knowing it was continuing a canceled TV show called Firefly)....YES!!!!!!!!!!!!

(I just can't let the Verse die. Why?)
 
Other than "Troy" I really don't remember any movies that were trying to get the "Gladiator" audience. Where are the "Lord of the Rings" type of movies? And was there really an increase in war movies after "Saving Private Ryan". Maybe a couple of new movies were greenlit from those movies but "Spider-Man" was the only of those movies that really created a demand for more movies like it.

Kingdom of Heave, King Arthur, and Alexander.
 
Other than "Troy" I really don't remember any movies that were trying to get the "Gladiator" audience. Where are the "Lord of the Rings" type of movies? And was there really an increase in war movies after "Saving Private Ryan". Maybe a couple of new movies were greenlit from those movies but "Spider-Man" was the only of those movies that really created a demand for more movies like it.

It's just not Lord of the Rings but also Harry Potter did it's pull in the genre.

Narnia, The Seeker, bridge to Terbitia, Eragon, and all those fantasy/kiddie movies.
 
Other than "Troy" I really don't remember any movies that were trying to get the "Gladiator" audience. Where are the "Lord of the Rings" type of movies? And was there really an increase in war movies after "Saving Private Ryan". Maybe a couple of new movies were greenlit from those movies but "Spider-Man" was the only of those movies that really created a demand for more movies like it.

Gladiator=

King Arthur (kind of a hit)
Troy
Alexander
Kingdom of Heaven (whose director cut I liked)

Hollywood smelled the paydirt, but the last two bombed at the box office and Troy only did middling. Otherwise, there would have been more. And does the show "Rome" count?

Lord of the Rings/Harry Potter=

The Chronicles of Narnia
The Golden Compass
Eragon
City of Ember
Peter Pan (2004)
The Bridge to Teribethia (as envisioned by Hollywood)
arguably Twilight on the Harry Potter side

I'm sure there are more I'm forgetting, but that is a good example, I think.
 
Star Wars sequels will come....someday. Only a fool would believe otherwise.


I want a Metroid film.

Nobody noticed this so I needed to draw attention to it :(

Yes, yes, yes, a thousand times yes. Bring on Metroid!
 
I'll Tell You Whats Next. Master Chiefs Delayed Entrance to the Big Screen

chief.jpg
 
What about The Six Billion Dollar Man?

We can rebuild him. We have the technology.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"