Wolverine VS. Sentinel clip

OutcryX said:
The Fastball Special in the comics is a Giant Russian man throwing a dwarfish man in the palm of his freakishly huge hand...in a baseball wind up. Hugh Jackman is not a small guy and having him be launched out of a not so freakishly huge Colossus's hand WOULD BE INCREDIBLY UNBELIEVABLE....and worth the *****ing that it would get....so take the movie version of the Fastball special(more like a discus throw) and be happy with it.

As a baseball fan, and someone who has seen Hugh Jackman on stage (he is freakin' TALL)...just believe me, they would look ridiculous if they did the fastball as a baseball throw
 
WorthyStevens4 said:
I haven't seen anyone from the 'Clip liking' camp saying the 'Clip disliking' camp had low standards.
That insult really wouldn't apply to the clip dsliking people, would it?
 
Bob Jahovic said:
Allow me to re-iterate what has been stated too many times to be conveniently counted:

You can hardly judge an entire movie based on 58 *****ing seconds. Is it so much to ask that we wait one month for this movie before we condemn the entire cast and crew to rot and burn in hell?

I mean, for God's sake, we've already waited 3 years; what's another 30 days?

I think most have judged the clip itself, not the whole movie. That'd be ridiculousoiosititious.

:spidey: Although there are those whose enthusiasm's given the movie top honors based on this little snippet.

Let's talk about the clip, guys, the clip. And Beer for everybody no matter what our age. it's on me.
 
danoyse said:
As a baseball fan, and someone who has seen Hugh Jackman on stage (he is freakin' TALL)...just believe me, they would look ridiculous if they did the fastball as a baseball throw

I know...that was my point
 
Sun_Down said:
Jesus, I don't think "nit-picking" is even the right phrase. It's more like you pick the nits that exist in the microscopic spaces that exist between the individual cells of the nits which can only be seen with an electron microscope. Then you breach the cell wall of the individual nits and pick around the cytoplasm until you've picked apart the damned nucleus.


I'm sorry but that's....sig-worthy. :p
 
Lightning Strikez! said:
And your opinion places you in a position to determine that because....:confused:
Because I think it's quite obvious that the dialogue in that scene is stilted and arkward. Perhaps it was edited down for the tonight show and will flow better in the film, but my god! It was almost painful watching that exchange.
 
wolverine91.jpg
 
OutcryX said:
The Fastball Special in the comics is a Giant Russian man throwing a dwarfish man in the palm of his freakishly huge hand...in a baseball wind up. Hugh Jackman is not a small guy and having him be launched out of a not so freakishly huge Colossus's hand WOULD BE INCREDIBLY UNBELIEVABLE....and worth the *****ing that it would get....so take the movie version of the Fastball special(more like a discus throw) and be happy with it.
This is one of the examples I talked about earlier about people being picky about things that get translated from comic to film...

-TNC
 
Bishop2 said:
I don't think we can truly expect Jean to go totally "Phoenix" on us in this movie. She's not going to have the forces of creation giving her intergalactic system-destroying powers, you know? I expect she's more like "Dark Jean Grey" than true full-on Phoenix.

She's not going to be the full-on Phoenix, but she'll still be very destructive.
 
Galactical said:
I think most have judged the clip itself, not the whole movie. That'd be ridiculousoiosititious.

:spidey: Although there are those whose enthusiasm's given the movie top honors based on this little snippet.

Let's talk about the clip, guys, the clip. And Beer for everybody no matter what our age. it's on me.
i like that word,ridiculousoisititious.... im stealing it!!!
 
sithgoblin said:
Because I think it's quite obvious that the dialogue in that scene is stilted and arkward. Perhaps it was edited down for the tonight show and will flow better in the film, but my god! It was almost painful watching that exchange.

In that case, blame the writing, not the acting.
 
Bob Jahovic said:
Allow me to re-iterate what has been stated too many times to be conveniently counted:

You can hardly judge an entire movie based on 58 *****ing seconds. Is it so much to ask that we wait one month for this movie before we condemn the entire cast and crew to rot and burn in hell?

I mean, for God's sake, we've already waited 3 years; what's another 30 days?

I agree. But I lump the people who think it'll be a disaster based on the 58 seconds with those that think it'll be the BEST MOVIE EVER based on those same 58 seconds (or the trailer or whatever).

So nobody has a problem with the continuity then?

It's been discussed at length.
 
sithgoblin said:
You're right about the fastball. But the other criticisms stand.

The Sentinel one is based on a 50-second clip, so it doesn't hold any water until the movie is released. And as for the Colossus effects, I agree, but full-body CGI always has and currently still does look fake, that's not anyone's fault. And I won't even touch the whole "faithful character adaptation" can of worms. :p
 
WorthyStevens4 said:
In that case, blame the writing, not the acting.

Why do I get the feeling that if people were to blame the writing then that will just open up more apolegetics to rationalize the writing?
 
The Original Bamfer said:
You forgot an 'e'
Um, thanks? It's called a typo. It's what happens when a lot of people are replying to you at once and you're trying to get back to them reasonably quickly.
 
Bishop2 said:
Of the clip? I think it's probably edited down a little.

I'm talking about the Sentinel having GIANT WHITE HEADLIGHT EYES, and then the dinky cheapo head has red LED slits.

Nobody notices how incredibly bad that is?
 
danoyse said:
I was agreeing. We have to work together to bring the naysayers down! :)

I concur! Smite them we must!...well not literally...but close your eyes and make believe
 
freshandclean said:
Why do I get the feeling that if people were to blame the writing then that will just open up more apolegetics to rationalize the writing?


I love when someone who disagrees becomes an apologist.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"