Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]363539[/split]
You guys all say Cyclops is more like Magneto and that he doesn't follow Charles' dream, but he's made the X-Men accepted superheroes, put them in a city that loves mutantkind, and hired PR people to improve the image of mutants with the national public.
He's still following Charles' dream. He just dropped the "no killing" rule.
He isolated mutants even further from mankind by establishing Utopia as opposed to integrating them fully into society.
He has the X-Men being active members in a city that is not a part of mainstream America.
And he hired PR people because of the people who are on his team: Magneto, Namor, Colossus (now the Avatar of Cyttorak), Jubilee (now a vampire), Emma Frost, and other mutants who people don't trust.....for good reason.
Not only that but it's not that he dropped the "no killing" rule, it's that he created a black ops assassination squad with X-Force and only disbanded it simply because he didn't want the Avengers to find out about it.
He allies himself with villains such as Dracula. He refuses to give Wanda a fair chance.
I think that Cyclops' moves go completely against Charles' dreams.
1. The United States government would never recognize the sovereignty of Utopia the way they do with Native American tribes. Especially after the way he did it. So if the US government wanted to, they still could have sent Norman Osborn to kick their ass but with the full support of H.A.M.M.E.R., U.S military, and entire 50 State Initiative.He established Utopia to get his people out from under the tyranical thumb of Norman Osborn. He saw what was happening and where it was going and he got his people safe. To integrate them into society would have kept them in danger, so he moved them somewhere out of Osborn's jurisdiction where they can also be protected. It makes sense to me.
They may not be strictly American, but in order to show them co-existing with society that means that they should try and integrate with general American society since that is where they live. He moved the X-Men to a city that is barely American in culture and style. New York City, Los Angeles, Boston, Chicago, Seattle, Philadelphia, Dallas, Atlanta, Detroit, New Orleans, those are all distinctly American cities that would have shown the X-Men integrating with the society of the nation they live in.But remember, the X-Men and mutants in general aren't strictly American. There's nothing in Xavier's dream that says they have to be pleasing in America's eye but that they co-exist with humans. He moved them to San Francisco for that purpose and then to Utopia to protect them and the people of San Francisco, but even on Utopia he still keeps good relations with the people of San Fran... co-existing with them. He's fulfilling Xavier's dream.
Now this I'll agree with.And this was a good move. It's hard to co-exist with humans if they fear the darker members, so a P.R. person helps establish the trust that's need to co-exist with a world that hates and fears them.
Except it's ****ing Dracula. He's a murderous monster who has killed thousands.The Dracula thing is him keeping his word, which in a round about way is actually noble.
Reason should still prevail over emotion. Charles Xavier would have at least listened to Wanda before deciding to automatically punish her.As for Wanda, that was a very personal issue and not everyone can be a boyscout about it. I don't really mind his response to this, though I do wish it was toned down a bit. Honestly, Heinburg's characterizations of several characters has been way off, Cyclops and Wolverine among them.
Except he didn't go back on track. Scott said that he has no regrets about X-Force and if he wasn't afraid of the general public and the Avengers finding out about it, he'd probably would have kept them around.I think the only one was X-Force and he decided to stop that (no matter the reasons) so he's back on track as far as I'm concerned.
You guys all say Cyclops is more like Magneto and that he doesn't follow Charles' dream, but he's made the X-Men accepted superheroes, put them in a city that loves mutantkind, and hired PR people to improve the image of mutants with the national public.
He's still following Charles' dream. He just dropped the "no killing" rule.
You guys all say Cyclops is more like Magneto and that he doesn't follow Charles' dream, but he's made the X-Men accepted superheroes, put them in a city that loves mutantkind, and hired PR people to improve the image of mutants with the national public.
He's still following Charles' dream. He just dropped the "no killing" rule.
hippie hunter, speaking as someone who lives in the Bay Area, I ask you: what the HELL does "mainstream America" mean? As far as I can tell, San Francisco is far from being some sort of underground secret.
hippie hunter, speaking as someone who lives in the Bay Area, I ask you: what the HELL does "mainstream America" mean? As far as I can tell, San Francisco is far from being some sort of underground secret.
Yeah, that's what Whedon's Astonishing X-Men started out as and what Alan Davis' run on Uncanny X-Men from a few years ago (when the X-Men first moved to San Fran but before they established Utopia) was about. They even got badges for the latter.The X-men becoming accepted superheroes is something that happens to them every few years...almost as on cue as Jean dying.
They were accepted as heroes at the end of Fall of the Mutants...I seem to recall NYC throwing a parade for X-factor.
I'm not saying that it's not part of America. It's most definitely American. But politically and socially it is far more progressive than the more moderate mainstream America. It's the progressive bastion of the United States. It's often been called more of a European city than an American one. And it has built up and thrived on that image. Not that this is a bad thing.
It really gives the city it's charm IMO. It feels more cosmopolitan than other American cities. It has a certain joie-de-vivre that just doesn't exist anywhere else in the United States. It's more environmentally aware. The architecture and organization of the city is just beautiful like a European city.
Im not sure I would give Fraction that credit. Brubaker was the one that moved the team to SF. His last solo arc in UXM did thatIt'd be a good way to ease into that in my opinion so I still call San Fran a good idea (one of the few Fraction actually had to be honest... when it comes to X-Men anyway).
If San Fran is more progressive than the rest of America then isn't that the perfect place for the X-Men to go? They'd be more accepting and therefor potentially be a first step toward showing the rest of the country that humans and mutants CAN co-exist? It'd be a good way to ease into that in my opinion so I still call San Fran a good idea (one of the few Fraction actually had to be honest... when it comes to X-Men anyway).
True, but it's a city that has also taken in progressive ideology. But they aren't as extreme as San Fransisco.They are?
When I think of Seattle I think of Frasier, rain, Kurt Cobain, and the Super Sonics. (who left.)
But Progressive city? Eh.
It's the second largest city in the United States that is often ignored in the Marvel Universe. And with the racism in L.A. it would be a great story for the X-Men to deal with.And L.A. is racist as hell.