God, stop being such an apologist.ANX and UXM could end up being two of the best books in Marvel and people will still hate on it regardless bc Bendis' name is on the front
No, he's not as bad as people claim. He can churn out extremely good stories here and there.I'm not saying Bendis is the best writer at Marvel or anything, I'm just saying that he's not as bad as people claim and I think he'll do a fine job on All New and Uncanny X-Men.
As far as his decompression goes, I think he's gotten better. Back when he used to write 6 issues per arc no matter what, it got old. He's moved away from that a bit though. Most of his stories seem to be 4 issues now (which is a good fit for him), though he does drag it out occassionally. The recent Norman Osborn story is an example of that. He's even written several done-in-one stories, such as Luke and Jessica's 1st date and most of the event tie-ins. Heck, his AvX tie-ins (in New Avengers) was some of the best stories to come out of that event.
His lack of decompression is part of the reason why I think New Avengers vol. 2 was some of his best work.
There was a ton of stuff with his Avengers books. Jessica Drew's whole storyline, the whole Dark Avengers period, Sentry, etc.Hah! That's great.
Though I admit to struggling with coming up with examples of his doing this. The Scarlet Witch is the only thing I can think of. Most everything else is typically wrapped up within a year or two of being introduced. The Ultron War maybe.
People were criticizing and slamming Bendis' X-men months ago before it was even officially announced he would be taking over. So yeah there is a bias bc the complaints and whining started when the original rumor popped up with people not wanting to give it a chanceGod, stop being such an apologist.
I don't see any legions of people criticizing Bendis for Ultimate Comics Spider-Man. Do you know why? Because its actually good! I can admit that quite easily, despite your claims of bias.
The reason why people criticize Bendis for Avengers and ANX is because they're written badly. Not because of some half baked vendetta.
Bendis's still very popular, IGN even featured his run on Avengers in their "The 25 Greatest Avengers Stories" article
It's also annoying when people want it to fail, and read the issues looking for things to criticize. I didn't think ANXM was perfect, but it was far far far from horrible. And that's with Marvel releasing over half the issue in previews.
There was a ton of stuff with his Avengers books. Jessica Drew's whole storyline, the whole Dark Avengers period, Sentry, etc.
Bendis's still very popular, IGN even featured his run on Avengers in their "The 25 Greatest Avengers Stories" article
We live in a comic book industry where Bendis can't even get Spider-Woman and Moon Knight to sell. Now you might say that Bendis had an uphill climb due to the fact that they're not widespread characters but keep in mind that Geoff Johns got Aquaman and Booster Gold to sell. Matt Fraction is getting Hawkeye to sell. Scott Snyder and Jeff Lemire are getting Swamp Thing and Animal Man to sell.
It's pretty clear that Bendis' name has diminished quite a bit over the past couple of years.
That Hawkeye book is selling well?

And man do I love me some Moon Knight
Moonknight is one of my top characters and I picked up the first issue against my reservations about Bendis...I didnt pick up the second one.
So, if you are Beast, and you have access to time travel, instead of going back in time to get the original teenage X-Men, why not go back in time and have a sit-down with the Avengers and X-Men and tell them what is about to go down, since you are the one man both teams would trust?