Zhang Yimou's The Great Wall (Matt Damon)

Chinese filmmaker Zhang Yimou has released a statement defending the decision.

“Our film is not about the construction of the Great Wall,” Zhang told EW. “Matt Damon is not playing a role that was originally conceived for a Chinese actor. The arrival of his character in our story is an important plot point. There are five major heroes in our story and he is one of them — the other four are all Chinese.”

“I have not and will not cast a film in a way that was untrue to my artistic vision,” he wrote.

so a director cant even cast his own movie i guess:whatever:
Listen, that doesn't mean there's a lack of controversy. All this discussion pretty much means there's a lot of it.
 
China/International Poster

eodwM9l0.jpg
 
http://variety.com/2016/film/asia/china-box-office-the-great-wall-65-million-opening-weekend-1201944941/

“The Great Wall,” Zhang Yimou’s English-language Chinese monster action adventure movie, scored a smashing $66 million in its opening weekend.

The film delivered box office of $17.7 million on Friday, $24 million on Saturday and $17 million on Sunday, with market share above 70% of the nationwide total on Friday and Saturday, dropping to 62% on Sunday. Including Thursday evening paid previews, that gives a weekend score of $66 million (RMB465 million), according to preliminary data from Ent Group. Other estimates may put the figure higher.
 
Having just read some of the reviews, I can tell you that the relationship between the Caucasian and Chinese characters is exactly what I thought it would be.
Spoil:

The Caucasian characters are depicted as immoral and clueless about honor.

The Chinese characters demonstrate to Damon their superior cultural values and teach him about honor, loyalty, and patriotism. In a sense, they civilize him.

It's the exact opposite of whitewashing. This is a pretty typical element of East-West relationships in Chinese cinema.
Nothing says China vs the West as blatantly as Wolf Warriors (2015), directed by and starring martial artist Wu Jing. He is a fantastic performer and he is great in other films as a villain and as a protagonist, but this is not a good film.

You may want to reconsider the term "whitewashing" once you've seen this knife fight between Wu and Scott Adkins. Wu plays a Chinese soldier, while Adkins plays a foreign mercenary.
[YT]_M9SkMk7aSY[/YT]
Foreigners are as likely to be the villains in Chinese action cinema as they are to be the protagonists when Chinese action films feature foreigners in any role of significance. People of ethnic Chinese descent dominate the protagonist roles in Chinese cinema, and China vs The Other is a frequent theme. In a landscape where one's degree of "Chinese-ness" is a source of enormous pride and tension among people from different regions, e.g., Mainland vs Taiwan vs Hong Kong, the majority of film protagonists are Chinese. Chinese audiences relate to, and value, their own stars more than they relate to, and value, foreign stars. Hollywood actors will never replace Chinese actors, and will only supplement them as a means to generate more revenue from international audiences. In the case of The Great Wall, Matt Damon supports Andy Lau, Eddie Peng, and the many other star actors in that film's cast.

I wouldn't be surprised if Willem Dafoe was a villain in The Great Wall just to balance things out. That was the case in Dragon Blade (2014), a dreadful Jackie Chan film in which John Cusack plays an ally of the heroes and Adrien Brody is the ruthless villain.
 
The whitewashing outcry for this film has always been so extra. The fact is if this movie didn't have any American actors, it definitely wouldn't even be released wide in America. That's a decision they probably made for financial reasons from the inception of this film.

Still, it looks boring. I get a Seventh Son vibe. I definitely want to check it out on DVD though.
 
Don’t you love it when there’s a controversy for a movie? I can’t get excited for a lot of movies nowadays without hearing a controversy behind it. Ever since I saw Exodus: Gods and Kings in 2014, that was my first full exposure to noticing whitewashing. I was appalled with how much miscasting there was for that movie even while watching (and trying to keep my eyes. And this was a Ridley Scott movie. would say The Last Airbender would be my first example, but believe it or not, it was very diverse what it was worth. With some films where the entire cast is of a different ethnicity and the lead is Caucasian, I don’t have an issue with it. A film has to appeal to everyone right? Why is Matt Damon in The Great Wall? To put the American audience’s asses into seats. Boy was I wrong.

Let me tell you, this film could’ve gone better without Matt Damon.

https://rendyreviews.com/movies//the-great-wall-review
 
Checking this out with the old man tomorrow, just to see the spectacle. Probably gonna see A Cure for Wellness right after.
 
oh yeah, i saw this like, two weeks ago, it was, meh, its visually interesting, but ultimately its pretty much a CG ****fest, there's some funny lines here and there but most of the characters are pretty bland, and
what a god damn waste of Willem Dafoe

I'd recommend waiting for a Rental.
 
It committed the biggest movie sin of all. It was neither good nor bad. It was just lukewarm and forgettable.
 
The key point is that this is a Chinese nationalism film akin to Wolf Warriors, and that this goes unnoticed amidst the unfounded whitewashing allegations. In fact, the whitewashing controversy obscures the fact that this film uses Caucasian actors to promote the standard "natives > foreigners" message that is so prevalent throughout Chinese cinema.

All of the white characters in this film are unsavory, immoral, selfish, greedy and depraved. The Chinese characters band together and are loyal, patriotic, and virtuous.

Damon's character is reformed by his exposure to Chinese culture, but is also proven to be less capable in combat than his Chinese peers. Due to the teachings of the righteous Chinese soldiers, he undergoes the transformation from "typical foreigner" to "honorable, noble disciple of the Chinese way."

Western audiences might find this to be unique and might even praise this "subversion of whitewashing roles"; Chinese audiences, however, will regard this as another example of the orthodox east-west dynamic in their domestic films.

This is the most common, predictable depiction of foreigners in Chinese cinema.

It really isn't a big deal, but I find it ironic based on the pre-release complaints of whitewashing. This film does the exact opposite of that.
 
Last edited:
I'd hardly call it a Chinese supremacy film. There are Chinese characters in the film who are greedy, unsavory, immoral, selfish and downright dumb.

I would say the whitewashing claims are overblown, but the other Chinese characters in the film aren't really developed in the film at all. The two most developed characters are really Tovar and William, and to a lesser extent Commander Lin. The other soldiers are tertiary characters and have very little in the way of actual characters.

It's not really whitewashing because the characters for William and Tovar are Westerners who journeyed East to find gunpowder to bring to the west for military use. They weren't cast in the role of Asian or ethnic characters. However, William is positioned as the main star and character in the movie. He has the closest thing resembling to a character arc in the movie.

What would've been better is if there were no white characters at all. Instead, make Lu Han's character the main one. Make him some young kid who has been conscripted in an ancient elite army that is the last line of defense to protect China from a supernatural threat. So it's not about this white European who comes in and brings his unique expertise to help the elite army turn the tide, it's an underdog youth from China who helps turn the tide.

Look, I know why these decisions are made. They wanted to make a big English language movie with Yimou's directing sensibilities but would play to a worldwide and not just an Asian audience. So they cast a big star in Damon centered a lot of the plot around his character.

I think the issue between something like this and say Ghost in the Shell is that many Asian American actors aren't given the opportunities to try and get these major starring roles.

And even when big stars are cast in these roles, they still don't guarantee success either.
 
I'd hardly call it a Chinese supremacy film. There are Chinese characters in the film who are greedy, unsavory, immoral, selfish and downright dumb.

I would say the whitewashing claims are overblown, but the other Chinese characters in the film aren't really developed in the film at all. The two most developed characters are really Tovar and William, and to a lesser extent Commander Lin. The other soldiers are tertiary characters and have very little in the way of actual characters.

It's not really whitewashing because the characters for William and Tovar are Westerners who journeyed East to find gunpowder to bring to the west for military use. They weren't cast in the role of Asian or ethnic characters. However, William is positioned as the main star and character in the movie. He has the closest thing resembling to a character arc in the movie.

What would've been better is if there were no white characters at all. Instead, make Lu Han's character the main one. Make him some young kid who has been conscripted in an ancient elite army that is the last line of defense to protect China from a supernatural threat. So it's not about this white European who comes in and brings his unique expertise to help the elite army turn the tide, it's an underdog youth from China who helps turn the tide.

Look, I know why these decisions are made. They wanted to make a big English language movie with Yimou's directing sensibilities but would play to a worldwide and not just an Asian audience. So they cast a big star in Damon centered a lot of the plot around his character.

I think the issue between something like this and say Ghost in the Shell is that many Asian American actors aren't given the opportunities to try and get these major starring roles.

And even when big stars are cast in these roles, they still don't guarantee success either.

If the protagonist wasn't white, we wouldn't be talking about this film. If a Chinese-American actor had been cast in the role, there is no doubt that they would have been asked to speak Chinese. In fact, many aspiring Chinese-American actors go to Hong Kong and China to pursue their acting careers.

Wang Leehom, for example, would have been a perfect candidate for the role, but then it would have only been popular in China and would likely have seen an Asia-only release. He is a Chinese-American superstar in China. It would have made more sense for him to speak Chinese than to have all of the other actors speak English, though. If you make an English-language film with an entirely Chinese cast, it ends up being another Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon: Sword of Destiny with people clamoring to know why the film wasn't filmed in Chinese.

This film was designed specifically for an international release. These kinds of big-budget action-fantasy films are not new to Chinese cinema. League of Gods was released just a few months ago; it features an all-star cast.

[YT]6_xbjElATtI[/YT]

Here's the fourth highest-grossing film of 2014 in China:

[YT]HLA6IVAPYrg[/YT]

And the third-highest grossing film of 2014 in China:

[YT]FgXdrN5SCuQ[/YT]

Film stars abound in these movies. Few people in the West watch them or even know about them except for the Chinese diaspora.

If you want a real historical epic, watch Red Cliff. There are dozens of war movies in recent Chinese cinema, but Red Cliff still stands out at the top.

What makes The Great Wall unique is its crossover appeal to the West. It stars a marquee Hollywood actor who, regardless of his role, will put Western audiences in seats as long as he is marketed as the star. The studio succeeded in putting Westerners in seats while also fueling Chinese nationalism and upholding the conventional relationship with foreigners in Chinese cinema.

Any time a Chinese film deals with foreigners, the result is usually the same: they are treated as lesser characters who are either entirely evil, require the guidance of Chinese wisdom, or are virtuous and subsequently give their seal of approval to their Chinese counterparts. Dragon Blade does exactly this, with John Cusack portraying a noble bodyguard who befriends and gains respect for Jackie Chan and the Chinese army. In that film, Adrien Brody plays Tiberius, a ruthless Roman soldier who murders his father, then blinds and eventually kills his preteen younger brother in order to gain status and power.

As soon as this film was announced, I posited what I felt Dafoe and Damon's roles would be; I was right.

Chinese people are very proud of their ethnic heritage, culture, and values, to the point of boasting about it to others. Chinese identity is a point of contention among Chinese people, and when they have an opportunity to flaunt their values and brag, they do so.

http://www.scmp.com/comment/insight...and-china-hong-kong-and-taiwan-should-realise
People in mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan should realise they do not own the sole right to Chinese identity
Danny Chan says the idea that nationality is a singular culture is outdated and no longer applies in today’s diverse and interconnected world
PUBLISHED : Sunday, 14 February, 2016, 8:30am
UPDATED : Sunday, 14 February, 2016, 8:30am

There are usually no winners in controversies about nationality, especially those that seek to impose one view over another. This is exactly what happened in the recent row over Taiwanese teen pop star Chou Tzu-yu – who was forced to apologise after waving the island’s flag on a South Korean TV show – and many other disputes about “Chineseness” in Hong Kong, Taiwan and on the mainland.

We often imagine a nation and its culture as a totality, with a single language or homogenous culture. Yet this is a fantasy; in reality, such thinking only engenders stereotypes and bias that widen the divide between people. Nationality can never be defined once and for all; the notion is subject to constant change and reform, and clinging to the past can never stop this.

There are many problems associated with old-school nationalism, including an unrelenting pursuit of an origin that is not found in daily life. Thus, to validate it, the only choice is to turn one’s back on the present and probe deeper into a past that not many find relevant.

Take contemporary Chinese immigration history as an example. It is a historical fact that war, famine and exploitation displaced a majority and forced them to head abroad to survive. This is what lies beneath the notion of the Chinese diaspora, which is now used to justify a centralising national totality.

If those at the centre are considered politically correct or culturally purified, and those at the margins are defective or impure, this root-searching mentality is just rubbing salt into old wounds.

Chineseness should always be plural, as long as each community is considered equal. It is not hard to find lots of Chinese communities around Southeast Asia speaking a language or living a lifestyle that is highly recognisable yet different from ours in Hong Kong. Judging which is more Chinese is not only unnecessary, it also ignores the fact that an identity is not something that can be easily pinned down.

While it is increasingly popular to search for one’s roots in Hong Kong, this needs careful examination. We complain about how our ways of life have been marginalised, what about the ethnic minorities among us? If we think learning about their culture is unnecessary, this root-searching mentality will not make our community more diverse or free.

Perhaps this mentality only serves to prolong rivalries for political use; a sad way to reconfirm the significance of our community. If so, then we are no different from those making a fuss about Chu’s flag-waving. Roots should never be mutually exclusive.
It's not unusual for Chinese people to discriminate against the Chinese diaspora either; Daniel Wu noted that when he went to China, people gawked at him at a restaurant and were surprised that he knew how to use chop sticks.

Mainland, Taiwanese, Hong Kong, and Western-Chinese people tend not to socialize with one another. They tend to remain within their own groups and can be prejudiced towards one another, although Western Chinese people are much less discriminatory towards the other groups than vice versa.

Former Washington State governor Gary Locke was recently called a "rotten banana" by Chinese state media, the metaphor being pretty apparent.

http://news.nationalpost.com/news/r...ameless-editorial-on-departing-u-s-ambassador
‘Rotten banana’: Chinese news service uses racist slur in ‘shameless’ editorial on departing U.S. ambassador
Didi Tang, The Associated Press | February 28, 2014 3:40 PM ET

BEIJING — A major Chinese government news service used a racist slur to describe the departing U.S. ambassador in a mean-spirited editorial Friday that drew widespread public condemnation in China.


The column — which called Gary Locke a “rotten banana,” a guide dog for the blind, and a plague — reflected Chinese nationalists’ acute loathing of the first Chinese-American to have been Washington’s top envoy to Beijing.


Mr. Locke’s ethnic background interested the Chinese government and people. He won public applause for carrying his own bag and flying economy class, but drew criticism from Beijing as his demeanour was an unwelcome contrast to Chinese officials’ privileges and entitlements.


...
Here's an exchange in Hong Kong between a native Hong Kong resident and a white motorcyclist:

[YT]XzGaZ1DZ4QE[/YT]

o0pigpig0o1 month ago
0:43 That guy: "Eh, is a Gweilo?"
0:44 Rider: "Yes, so? I can speak Cantonese"
0:45 Shocked
In the comments section, there are a bunch of people trying to distinguish "Hong Kongese" from "Chinese." Note that "gweilo" is a Cantonese derogatory term for white people, meaning "white ghost;" it is also the primary word used to identify white people in Cantonese.

I tried to watch From Vegas to Macau recently and saw a gag that many would consider to be racist in the West; check out 14:55:

[YT]5BIx4nfZFAA[/YT]

One of the protagonists is stunned that a woman he finds attractive is with Chow Yun-fat's character; when he goes to hug her, she shuffles out of the way and he ends up hugging a black guy instead. When he looks up and sees who he is hugging, he walks away crying. This film is the fourth film in the extremely popular God of Gamblers film series, which currently has six installments.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/china-racist-black-people_us_576a9840e4b065534f485002
06/27/2016 01:32 pm ET Nigerian In China: Why Are People Here So Racist Towards Black People?
"There are so many more Chinese people who live in my country and yet they don’t get hassled anywhere near as much as we do in China! Why?"
Eric Olander and Cobus van Staden The China Africa Project

...

Hey Guys: why are Chinese people so racist towards black people? I mean really. I am from Nigeria and I have lived in Guangzhou for 6 months already and I can tell you that a lot of people here really don’t like black people. What %$^&#* me off so much is that there are so many more Chinese people who live in my country and yet they don’t get hassled anywhere near as much as we do in China! Why?

-- Sent from Guangzhou via email
* * *​
Yeah, you’re totally right to be upset because it sucks big time to be on the receiving end of any kind of discrimination, racism or prejudice. So we get that. Before I go any further, though, I also want to point out that none of my explanations here are intended to justify people being jerks and their bad behavior. However, there is a context here that may be helpful to shed some light on why some Chinese people seemingly respond negatively to blacks, whites and people of other ethnicities (yes, it’s not just a black thing).

The Chinese will take every opportunity they can find to talk about their 5,000 years of history and that theirs is the longest continuous civilization on Earth (which is pretty impressive). For all of that history, including the present, China has been almost exclusively a mono-ethnic culture that is basically ethnic Han Chinese.

Moreover, throughout Chinese history there has been a strong belief that they are superior to all other countries and people. As you may already know, the word "China" in Chinese is pronounced "zhong guo," which literally means “Middle Kingdom,” or in plain English, "The Center of the Universe."

So combine the fact that there has long been a sense of cultural superiority that is deeply ingrained in Chinese culture mixed with the fact that the vast majority of Chinese people you meet on the streets of Guangzhou have probably never interacted with someone of another race or ethnicity and, well, you have all you need for a lot of cultural misunderstanding.
A common belief among Chinese descendants is that the more Chinese a person is, the better. Ethnic, national, and cultural pride are very important among people of Chinese descent. Chinese people are very nationalistic as a whole, whether their heart is with China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Macau, or any other place. There is no doubt that, in this context, The Great Wall encourages Chinese nationalism.

Damon's character is designed to be a punching bag.

One clear distinction must be made: you will see a lot of anti-Japanese sentiment in Chinese and Hong Kong films due to resentment from the atrocities committed by the Japanese to many Chinese communities and Chinese people before and during the Sino-Japanese War, e.g., 6 to 8 million killed. These actions are considered to be war crimes. Japanese denial or misrepresentation of these actions and lack of remorse have had a strong effect on depictions of Japanese people in Chinese cinema and on Chinese opinions of Japanese people as a whole. This is unrelated to the issues discussed above and should not be conflated. There is a difference between nationalism, disliking foreign cultures, and being enraged by genocide.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_war_crimes
Therefore, Rummel’s estimate of 6-million to 10-million dead between 1937 (the Rape of Nanjing) and 1945, may be roughly corollary to the time-frame of the Nazi Holocaust, but it falls far short of the actual numbers killed by the Japanese war machine. If you add, say, 2-million Koreans, 2-million Manchurians, Chinese, Russians, many East European Jews (both Sephardic and Ashkenazi), and others killed by Japan between 1895 and 1937 (conservative figures), the total of Japanese victims is more like 10-million to 14-million. Of these, I would suggest that between 6-million and 8-million were ethnic Chinese, regardless of where they were resident.[3]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_of_Nanjing
The Nanking Massacre was an episode of mass murder and mass rape committed by Japanese troops against the residents of Nanjing (then spelled Nanking), then the capital of the Republic of China during the Second Sino-Japanese War. The massacre occurred over a period of six weeks starting on December 13, 1937, the day that the Japanese captured Nanjing. During this period, soldiers of the Imperial Japanese Army murdered Chinese civilians and disarmed combatants who numbered an estimated 40,000 to over 300,000,[7][8] and perpetrated widespread rape and looting.[9][10]


...

Although the Japanese government has admitted to the killing of a large number of non-combatants, looting, and other violence committed by the Imperial Japanese Army after the fall of Nanking,[17][18] and Japanese veterans who served there have confirmed that a massacre took place,[19] a small but vocal minority within both the Japanese government and society have argued that the death toll was military in nature and that no such crimes ever occurred. Denial of the massacre and revisionist accounts of the killings have become a staple of Japanese nationalism.[20] In Japan, public opinion of the massacres varies, but few deny outright that the conflict occurred.[20]

...
 
Last edited:
As an aside: Wolf Warriors 2 is being released in August 2017.

It stars Wu Jing and Frank Grillo. Grillo is the villain.

http://screenanarchy.com/2017/01/wu...k-grillo-in-first-wolf-warrior-2-trailer.html
January 25 2017, 2:00 PM

Wu Jing Has A Message For Frank Grillo In First WOLF WARRIOR 2 Trailer
Todd Brown
Founder and Editor; Toronto, Canada (@AnarchistTodd)




...

I think it's fair to say that 2015 action effort Wolf Warrior was an unexpected hit. The Wu Jing / Scott Adkins team up was - and I seriously say this with immense affection - dumb as a bag of hammers and neither Wu nor Adkins were really what could be considered bankable stars in the Chinese market that was its principal target. It featured Wu fighting off a pack of hysterically CGI wolves with his bare hands. It was, however, dumb in exactly the right way, playing straight into populist wish fulfillment for Chinese audiences in a manner that lines up pretty well with how American action films of the 90s approached the audience over here and it went on to be a MASSIVE hit throughout Mainland China.


And so, sequel.


Adkins died in the first one and so to keep up with the American villain structure of the first they've pulled in Frank Grillo as the baddy this time. And based on the just released first trailer they've upped the budget considerably. CGI wolves? No, but there are a trio of actual tanks bashing through an actual wall. And while they're clearly holding back on the hand to hand combat for farther down the promotional line, Wu delivers a universally understandable message to his American foe.


...
[YT]m3UaQncKz04[/YT]
 
If the protagonist wasn't white, we wouldn't be talking about this film. If a Chinese-American actor had been cast in the role, there is no doubt that they would have been asked to speak Chinese. In fact, many aspiring Chinese-American actors go to Hong Kong and China to pursue their acting careers.

Wang Leehom, for example, would have been a perfect candidate for the role, but then it would have only been popular in China and would likely have seen an Asia-only release. He is a Chinese-American superstar in China. It would have made more sense for him to speak Chinese than to have all of the other actors speak English, though. If you make an English-language film with an entirely Chinese cast, it ends up being another Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon: Sword of Destiny with people clamoring to know why the film wasn't filmed in Chinese.

This film was designed specifically for an international release. These kinds of big-budget action-fantasy films are not new to Chinese cinema. League of Gods was released just a few months ago; it features an all-star cast.

[YT]6_xbjElATtI[/YT]

Here's the fourth highest-grossing film of 2014 in China:

[YT]HLA6IVAPYrg[/YT]

And the third-highest grossing film of 2014 in China:

[YT]FgXdrN5SCuQ[/YT]

Film stars abound in these movies. Few people in the West watch them or even know about them except for the Chinese diaspora.

If you want a real historical epic, watch Red Cliff. There are dozens of war movies in recent Chinese cinema, but Red Cliff still stands out at the top.

What makes The Great Wall unique is its crossover appeal to the West. It stars a marquee Hollywood actor who, regardless of his role, will put Western audiences in seats as long as he is marketed as the star. The studio succeeded in putting Westerners in seats while also fueling Chinese nationalism and upholding the conventional relationship with foreigners in Chinese cinema.

Any time a Chinese film deals with foreigners, the result is usually the same: they are treated as lesser characters who are either entirely evil, require the guidance of Chinese wisdom, or are virtuous and subsequently give their seal of approval to their Chinese counterparts. Dragon Blade does exactly this, with John Cusack portraying a noble bodyguard who befriends and gains respect for Jackie Chan and the Chinese army. In that film, Adrien Brody plays Tiberius, a ruthless Roman soldier who murders his father, then blinds and eventually kills his preteen younger brother in order to gain status and power.

As soon as this film was announced, I posited what I felt Dafoe and Damon's roles would be; I was right.

Chinese people are very proud of their ethnic heritage, culture, and values, to the point of boasting about it to others. Chinese identity is a point of contention among Chinese people, and when they have an opportunity to flaunt their values and brag, they do so.

http://www.scmp.com/comment/insight...and-china-hong-kong-and-taiwan-should-realise
It's not unusual for Chinese people to discriminate against the Chinese diaspora either; Daniel Wu noted that when he went to China, people gawked at him at a restaurant and were surprised that he knew how to use chop sticks.

Mainland, Taiwanese, Hong Kong, and Western-Chinese people tend not to socialize with one another. They tend to remain within their own groups and can be prejudiced towards one another, although Western Chinese people are much less discriminatory towards the other groups than vice versa.

Former Washington State governor Gary Locke was recently called a "rotten banana" by Chinese state media, the metaphor being pretty apparent.

http://news.nationalpost.com/news/r...ameless-editorial-on-departing-u-s-ambassador
Here's an exchange in Hong Kong between a native Hong Kong resident and a white motorcyclist:

[YT]XzGaZ1DZ4QE[/YT]

In the comments section, there are a bunch of people trying to distinguish "Hong Kongese" from "Chinese." Note that "gweilo" is a Cantonese derogatory term for white people, meaning "white ghost;" it is also the primary word used to identify white people in Cantonese.

I tried to watch From Vegas to Macau recently and saw a gag that many would consider to be racist in the West; check out 14:55:

[YT]5BIx4nfZFAA[/YT]

One of the protagonists is stunned that a woman he finds attractive is with Chow Yun-fat's character; when he goes to hug her, she shuffles out of the way and he ends up hugging a black guy instead. When he looks up and sees who he is hugging, he walks away crying. This film is the fourth film in the extremely popular God of Gamblers film series, which currently has six installments.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/china-racist-black-people_us_576a9840e4b065534f485002
A common belief among Chinese descendants is that the more Chinese a person is, the better. Ethnic, national, and cultural pride are very important among people of Chinese descent. Chinese people are very nationalistic as a whole, whether their heart is with China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Macau, or any other place. There is no doubt that, in this context, The Great Wall encourages Chinese nationalism.

Damon's character is designed to be a punching bag.

One clear distinction must be made: you will see a lot of anti-Japanese sentiment in Chinese and Hong Kong films due to resentment from the atrocities committed by the Japanese to many Chinese communities and Chinese people before and during the Sino-Japanese War, e.g., 6 to 8 million killed. These actions are considered to be war crimes. Japanese denial or misrepresentation of these actions and lack of remorse have had a strong effect on depictions of Japanese people in Chinese cinema and on Chinese opinions of Japanese people as a whole. This is unrelated to the issues discussed above and should not be conflated. There is a difference between nationalism, disliking foreign cultures, and being enraged by genocide.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_war_crimes
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_of_Nanjing
It's not a good movie. I know it's already made $225 million overseas, but I think it's going to bomb here. I think in its attempt to cater to the international audience, the movie became more mediocre.
 
Last edited:
So, apparently, the theme song is performed by Wang Leehom and Tan Weiwei.

It's a good song, and it contains some unusually-powerful vocals relative to Mandopop standards. It has some very clear western influences. Wang grew up in New York, and his musical style incorporates a lot of Western influences.

It's called "Bridge of Fate."

[YT]EQ5Ib7jNnnE[/YT]

Leehom (that's his given name) is a favorite of mine in the Mandopop scene.
 
Last edited:
It's not a good movie. I know it's already made $225 million overseas, but I think it's going to bomb here. I think in its attempt to cater to the international audience, the movie became more mediocre.
I don't think that has anything to do with catering to the international audience.

I find some Chinese films to be pretty average, while others are incredible. The Great Wall was never going to be a masterpiece based on its premise; the film just doesn't tell a good story. The intent was never to tell an historical epic, but to do a monster movie with lots of effects.

The film suffers because of its poor story, not because of its inclusion of Matt Damon. In fact, even if other things had happened throughout the film, he still could have played the same character.
 
Last edited:
The film did not succeed at the North American box office this weekend.

http://www.ctvnews.ca/entertainment/lego-batman-stays-no-1-conquers-the-great-wall-1.3292269
'Lego Batman' stays No. 1, conquers 'The Great Wall'
Jake Coyle, The Associated Press
Published Sunday, February 19, 2017 1:49PM EST
Last Updated Sunday, February 19, 2017 4:39PM EST

NEW YORK -- "The Great Wall" was a hit in China. In North America, it was a dud.

The most expensive film ever made in China and with a budget of $150 million, "The Great Wall" was intended to prove that the world's no. 2 movie marketplace could produce Hollywood-sized blockbusters of its own. Though it ran up $171 million in ticket sales in China, "The Great Wall" pulled in $18.1 million in its North American debut over Presidents Day weekend, according to studio estimates Sunday.

...

Slammed by critics, "The Great Wall" didn't measure up to its initial ambitions. It was produced by Legendary Entertainment, which has since been acquired by Chinese conglomerate Wanda Group. The film, directed by Zhang Yimou, originated with an idea by Legendary chief executive Thomas Tull, who exited the company last month.


But "The Great Wall" isn't a bomb. It has made $244.6 million overseas and performed over the weekend in North America slightly better than some pundits expected.
"This is absolutely a strategy that's worldwide," said Nick Carpou, distribution chief for Universal. "Worldwide, we are one of many markets."


...
 
“Great Wall” Heads For A $75 Million Loss

By
Garth Franklin -

Thursday, March 2nd 2017 11:48 am
http://cdn3.darkhorizons.com/wp-con...the-great-wall-headed-for-70-million-loss.jpg
The future of U.S.-China co-productions has taken a big hit with the failure of the Matt Damon-led “The Great Wall” likely ending up with losses of more than $75 million reports THR.
To date the film has pulled in $171 million in China, way less than investors had anticipated, and an utterly woeful $34.8 million in North America. Universal Pictures alone, who funded 25% of the film’s $150 million production budget and $80 million+ for the film’s global marketing expenses, is expected to be on the hook for at least $10 million.
Globally the film is expected to finish up at around $320 million. If the film generates hoped-for ancillary revenue from home entertainment sales, the damage could be mitigated to some extent.
Not helping is that reviews for the film were notably terrible with the movie scoring just 42/100 on Metacritic.
 
So much for international grosses redeeming a film bombing in the US.
 
I haven't seen the movie, but the movie missed the boat by having well made CG creations of Chinese mythological creatures - the Chinese dragon, lion. I'm talking about keeping the stylistic choices of old Chinese art, and not caring so much about real world anatomy. That means bulging eyes, mammal features, and other dream like qualities.

What I saw from the trailers was just poorly rendered green monster things.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"