huh?C'mon, no one actually thinks TDK can win even the domestic box office with a Harry Potter movie out next year, right? I'll give it highest grossing superhero flick next year of course (even though I'm looking forward to both TIH and IR more) given how unexpectedly well BB did. But this is Potter. Not having anymore books left may even help the movie as there won't be anything to steal the fans time and at the same time giving them the only thing they got left in that universe.
Early predictions...top 15...not too huge after this year with 5 300 million dollar hits.
1. Indiana Jones - 325 million
2. Harry Potter-315 million
3. The Dark Knight - 290 million
4. Narnia - 265 million
5. Wall-e - 250 million
6. Bedtime Stories- 240 million
7. Madagascar 2- 225 million
8. Angels and Demons - 210 million
9. Bond 22- 200 million
10. Iron Man - 180 million
11. Horton Hears A who - 155 million
12. John Hancock- 155 million
13. Get Smart: 145
14. The Incredible Hulk - 140 million
15. The Wolfman - 125 million
Top 15 opening weekends...no real records going down...
1. Harry Potter - 115 million
2. The Dark Knight - 105 million
3. Indiana Jones- 100 million (opens on a Thursday), 135 4 day, 160 5 day
4. Narnia - 85 million
5. Wall-e - 65
7. Iron Man- 60 million
8. Bond 22- 55 million
9. Mummy 3: 52 million
10. Madagascar 2- 50 million
11. The Incredible Hulk - 48 million
12. Bedtime Stories - 47 million
13. Get Smart - 45 million
14. Angels and Demons - 45 million
15. Speed Racer: 45 millon
You just have to realize how HUGE getting $300M is. It's much harder than Spider-Man makes it look. A $300M movie isn't just good or even great. It infects the entire country with it's buzz and it lasts into it's sequels. Just consider this: Harry Potter, the second highest (soon to be first with the next movie) grossing film franchise in history has only hit the $300M mark once domestically in 5 movies and it has as wide a range an audience as it gets. The highest grossing spy flick ever is Mission Impossible 2 with $215M. Bond just isn't in a moneymaking genre and praise can only take you so far in the box office.
Potter has a definitive end. Bond doesn't. I'd say that gives Bond the longevity advantage. But stack up the best 5 Bond films with inflation and I'm sure it doesn't come close to what Potter has done. Bond's strength as a franchise is in it's number of films alone.
yes it does. Kills it, actually. Potter has much more im common with star wars...its a huge worldwide phenominon. It wont just go away. Potter will always be huge, even 20-30 years after the final films out.