But I don't believe those type of QB's can win a Super Bowl in the game today. I think Dilfer is the last "game manager" we are going to see win a Super Bowl. Even Brad Johnson was more than simply a guy that didn't make mistakes with Tampa.
Mark Sanchez has proven that he CAN be a competent NFL starting QB (something he didn't display until the wildcard game), but I don't believe Sanchez is close to being a "good" NFL QB which is needed to win a Super Bowl or to make it most years (waiting for someone to bring up Rex Grossman in Chicago).
I could argue that Big Ben was more of a game manager with his first Super Bowl, only required to make a few big throws that he DID make. Sanchez is fully capable of throwing a bomb to Edwards if he gets open. I think the Johnson was required to do SOME work, but he still didn't have to do hardly anything with that defense in 02. Dilfer, Johnson, in a way Big Ben in 04, and yes, Rex Grossman were all in their own way game managers, relying more on the running game and especially defense to get them to the Super Bowl. I do admit the team's odds are better if the QB can take over the game, but this game, Indy/NY, IMO isn't going to be decided based on the fact that Sanchez can't take over and control the game with his arm.
The Jets' running game is much better than the Ravens, PLUS they have a wildcat play or two in place as well. If they keep pounding the running game, all it would take is a play action or flea flicker deep to Edwards for a TD and Sanchez is a hero for life in New York.
I think Sheppard, Revis, and Leonard will shut down Indy's passing game for the most part, but if New York can't get first downs with the running game, Peyton will pick them apart in time. New York HAS to control the clock and keep Manning on the sidelines to win this game. It's fully possible they can do it, but if they get behind early it's basically over.
Okay, done rambling. I probably shouldn't post very much after midnight when my brain shuts down at 11.