- Joined
- Feb 15, 2001
- Messages
- 62,413
- Reaction score
- 4,327
- Points
- 203
Where has Tebow been called a "great player?"![]()
Everywhere.
Where has Tebow been called a "great player?"![]()
Jackson basically ran personnel decisions following Davis' death and he really dropped the ball. He has apparently been very antagonistic towards McKenzie as once Oakland hired a GM he did not want to give up his power. Following his post-San Diego game meltdown, his termination was inevitable. He was never cut out to be a head coach. He was always only an Al Davis puppet. McKenzie wants to build a real team for Oakland rather than allow the cluster **** that has been the past 15 years to continue. He needs a real coach to do that. This firing gives Oakland fans a lot to be excited for, IMO.
I'm not one who thrust Tebow into a higher level of QB but I think it's funny that with the Sanchez comparison, that Sanchez's hype is strictly based on his success in the Post Season. And now that the Jets s' the bed, there are louder grumblings that maybe he wasn't that "great".
I agree. Al David and Hue Jackson were both all too willing to give up first-round picks for expensive players that in the end aren't worth the picks that traded for them, and if Oakland wants to stop their perpetual cycle of mediocrity they have to adapt the models of successful franchises like Green Bay, to build their team from the ground up. No more of these shortcuts to try to get to the top from now on.
The problem I have with Tebow is that, he is actually playing on a very underrated team with great defense, but he gets all the credit even though if you look at his numbers, he is quite average. However, since he "led" his team through some 4th Quarter comebacks, people want to anoint him as the Second Coming of John Elway. On the other hand, Mark Sanchez never got any of the accolades that Tebow got, even though he also has some average numbers but his team is also in the ultra-competitive AFC East, and not a mediocre one like AFC West. What's more is that Sanchez actually helped his team won 4 playoff games, all on the road, and gotten them to the AFC Conference Final for two straight years. The difference, people would argue, is that Sanchez had an elite defense (which I would also argue that Tebow has), and Sanchez has thrown more INT than Tebow (but that's because Tebow hardly throws at all).
So can people tell me why Tebow is called a "great player" but Sanchez isn't? To me these two aren't that different from each other, and both have alot of deficiencies that his respective team helped cover up.
Where has Tebow been called a "great player?"![]()
Last week before the playoffs began, some young kid at church was making an attempt at smack talk, he said of the Broncos "All Tebow does is win!"
Me: The Broncos are 8-8, and they have lost three in a row.
He didn't say anything else. lol
Last week before the playoffs began, some young kid at church was making an attempt at smack talk, he said of the Broncos "All Tebow does is win!"
Me: The Broncos are 8-8, and they have lost three in a row.
He didn't say anything else. lol
we're gonna make the grass a tad bit wetter than normal. I drove past candlestick today and the grass is in need of water.![]()
The world will root for Tebow to beat Brady.
Unlikely though, but you never know
Denver's defense is great, it truly is, but he seems to pass when it's in the right moment. Sometimes he misses his targets, sure, but when you only pass at a very low number, and the Broncos scored 29 points, he passed it, mostly, at the right and at the most perfect times. Plus, he's a freaking fullback when he runs with the ball and can hardly be stopped, imo.
And...Sanchez can never be shown as a "great" player because he's in an awful team that only got lucky with the Colts and Patriots last season and the Jets showed their worth this season. The Jets are a running team, but I want to see them work around Sanchez and get some better receivers.
You call Sanchez lucky, yet you don't acknowledge the fact that Tebow & the Broncos lost their last three games, and only won the division because of Raiders' gaffe against the Chargers.
Crushing the dreams of kids at Church. I like it
I can acknowledge that...but no one has asked, hahahaha.
I KNOW Broncos got extremely lucky in getting in, and surprisingly they were the better team last weekend.
Your avatar/pic/whatever it's actually called doesn't help when saying the Patriots are evil, lol.
I prefer Metallica's version.
You call Sanchez lucky, yet you don't acknowledge the fact that Tebow & the Broncos lost their last three games, and only won the division because of Raiders' gaffe against the Chargers.
So you said that Sanchez can't be called "great" because his team got lucky making to the playoff, yet Tebow did the same thing but you have no problem proclaiming him as a great player?![]()
Either way that theme should be played
Lol, it's true...that looks freaky to me. I am a fan of Belichick though. I hate the Steelers, so this is a tough game for me to actually prefer one team over the other. All of the same this weekend are like that except for Texans and Ravens.
I love me some Tebow. Imagine what the viewership is going to be for the Patriots vs Broncos. Through the roof.
Sanchez didn't exactly light up the postseason in 2009 & 2010. I think only 2 games above 20 points? Only 2 games above 200 yards and like 9 TD in six games.
He's a great QB. Sanchez has always been mediocre. Even when I followed both in college, Tebow was better in my eyes, and with the Jets, Sanchez has never been able to really go for the gusto, imo. Like I said, Broncos has been playing around Tebow which makes him great; Jets have never done that.