rumpuso said:I came away from this episode really shaken about Lana and her motivations. It felt as if Lana was not only mean spirited about the whole thing, but perhaps also out to actually harm Clark. She just felt like a different Lana, and I don't know this one at all. I do know, however, that Clark made a very good choice by letting her go. She seems unstable and would not be the correct person to share his secret with.
(And Serene, if you are reading this, what was your impression of Lana last night?)
Super_Ludacris said:That dude was a little too friendly with Clark at times
celldog said:Great points!! Don't forget Clark's gutless lack of honesty with her about his secret, over the last 5 seasons.![]()
BaK said:why do I think I've seen this before ?
naah.. must have been "seeing" things again.. like that fat lady.. brrr..
From my POV, Lana is incapable of protecting Clark's secret at this point in her life. And he told her because he knew in a few weeks time that he was going to lose her. So technically, he told her out of fear and not confidence. That to me shows how little faith he has in her.avidreader said:He told her and she died. You think he wants to go through that again.
Serene said:And Lois.. yeah, we get it, she's his future. But I thought that scene with Martha was just silly. "Gee, Martha.. Ya think *I'll* ever meet a nice guy from a good family? Anyone *know* any guys like that?? Hmmm??"
I mean.. come the **** on! LOL.. Another nudge, nudge moment.
KalKai said:
I had to explain that to my husband too, so yes, I'm in complete agreement with you. The foreshadowing wasn't just about Lois and Clark, it was about Clark's break with Lana.avidreader said:I actually thought those words were for Lana as well (even though she wasn't in the room).
Nautica7mk said:From my POV, Lana is incapable of protecting Clark's secret at this point in her life. And he told her because he knew in a few weeks time that he was going to lose her. So technically, he told her out of fear and not confidence. That to me shows how little faith he has in her.
I know he loved her, but that doesn't change the fact that he felt he had to tell her in fear he was going to lose her. His conversation with Chloe in that very same episode confirms that. And he saved her because he didn't want her to die, just as he tried to do with Jonathan (from scenes we never got to see). To be honest, they're both unhealthy for one another, you've got five years full of evidence to prove that.Super_Ludacris said:I really dont think Clark was that smart to do that. Then why did he bother to save her? And if he lost her than you dotn what an ex knowing your secret is capable of. He told her cause he loved her.
AgentPat said:I had to explain that to my husband too, so yes, I'm in complete agreement with you. The foreshadowing wasn't just about Lois and Clark, it was about Clark's break with Lana.
Or that he THINKS, (again), that it's definiteley over..avidreader said:I think the signifance of him putting the telescope away was to say its DEFINITELY over.
BaK said:Or that he THINKS, (again), that it's definiteley over..
But anyway, i think it's kind of half-full half-empty-glass debate..
As long as they have some options open, (and we all know that she will not end up with Lex), I'd say nobody's 100% right about their future in the short term..
![]()
Mmm... he didn't really say. Gotta understand, hubby isn't into the "touchy feely" stuff LOL. He rolls his eyes during those kind of scenes, but he's up close and personal when Clark rides a nuclear missile into orbit or when Lex is being particularly baaaad. Hee! Different strokes for different folks.avidreader said:Did your husband understand?
Also, something to keep in mind, the spoilers mentioned that he broke his telescope in a jealous rage. They *could* have cut that scene in editing and when he referred to his telescope not working, he may have meant it literally.avidreader said:I think the signifance of him putting the telescope away was to say its DEFINITELY over.