7 new Spider-Man 3 clips

Spider-Man IS a cartoony character, he´s a man who moves like no human being can, that will never look entirely realistic, would they in theory do a lot of motion capture, say? They would, but they would have to downplay it a lot cuz of the distances and complexity of movements and we´d lose a lot of the spectacle and vertigo and kinetic energy of Spider-man, you see a human being moving with a speed and impulse that no human being can, something in your brain will always tell you something is wrong, the idea that Spider-Man can do all those spectacular things and still look totally realistic is nothing but a fanboy illusion, period.

hi there

Ong_051020042559526_wideweb__300x375.jpg
 
vlcsnap1302004xw0.png
Hi, I should have been in the first movie.

vlcsnap1313777fg2.png
Oh my god, why did I waste two films drooling over MJ!

vlcsnap1293589dv6.png
I'm losing my mind!
 
i dont know why they waited for the third movie to have Gwen in.
 
I can agree with the people in this thread complaining over the shot right after Harry picks up Peter, and they go loose on each other; it DOES look pretty obvious to be CG!!! It bugs me too! And like I explained before, I can't understand how there can be that BIG of a CG differents in this film! AGREED!???....

Take a look at the shot where Peter is falling down with the debree flipping around as we see him trying hard to stay on it... First we see a long shot and we ultimate believe that it's CG because there's no way that it could be done in real life. Then -IN THAT SAME SHOT- we zoom in on Peter on the debree, waaaay in on a close-up, and it's DEFINITLY Tobey!!! That shot is so impressive, that's why it bugs the HELL out of me when I see those small CG images that makes my toes crumble!:(
 
I can agree with the people in this thread complaining over the shot right after Harry picks up Peter, and they go loose on each other; it DOES look pretty obvious to be CG!!! It bugs me too! And like I explained before, I can't understand how there can be that BIG of a CG differents in this film! AGREED!???....

Take a look at the shot where Peter is falling down with the debree flipping around as we see him trying hard to stay on it... First we see a long shot and we ultimate believe that it's CG because there's no way that it could be done in real life. Then -IN THAT SAME SHOT- we zoom in on Peter on the debree, waaaay in on a close-up, and it's DEFINITLY Tobey!!! That shot is so impressive, that's why it bugs the HELL out of me when I see those small CG images that makes my toes crumble!:(

I really think you guys are overreacting to this, and simply the 7 minute clip and this EXTREMELY SHORT CLIP are not complete. They likely included the new shots in this clip because we haven't seen them before- but in the movie it will all flow nicely together.
 
i dont know why they waited for the third movie to have Gwen in.

Because Sam Raimi lacks the ability to tell spider-man's story properly and within the means of 3 films. As movies, they're not bad but as spider-man movies, so far they're quite bad.
 
Why?Because he didnt went word-for-word from the comics?You clearly have issues and i still dont understand what the hell are you doing here badmouthing in EVERY possible post...

If he did it like in the comics it would be like in a Spanish series....and then we need Liz Alen and Ned Leeds and he should fall in love with Betty but he doesnt like Betty so he hates Ned even though he isnt interested in her anymore, and then he likes Liz ...and then he doesnt and then he likes Gwen and then she gets killed and then he starts dating M.J...you see,if they did it like in the comics it will be a mess,in a comic book world with thousand of issues it's great but in a 2 hour movie....***in Borat's voice*** NOT
 
I really think you guys are overreacting to this, and simply the 7 minute clip and this EXTREMELY SHORT CLIP are not complete. They likely included the new shots in this clip because we haven't seen them before- but in the movie it will all flow nicely together.
Those few CG images that makes my "toes crumble" as I say, they dont ruin the movie for me at all; but they BUG me, seriously!!

And these clips that's posted on IGN (though I haven't seen any other than the Pete VS. Harry fight clip), I think you better come to realize that they ARE the final product!... and that little CG image of Pete and Harry hitting each other in the begining of the clip really is quite noticable! (funny thing is, if you pause it and go at that sequence image by image it DOESN'T look bad... But play it at full speed you notice it with the same!)
 
I have pics of the symbiot mask in the bell tower but I don´t know if I should post it because some people here doesn´t want to be spoiled.
 
ultimatefan,

It has nothing to do with his movements. The cartoony look has everything to do with how the light bounces off of the CG character's fabric and the rendering. If done improperly, it gives it a rubbery look. If done correctly, you'll have a harder time figuring out if the character is CG or not.
 
I have pics of the symbiot mask in the bell tower but I don´t know if I should post it because some people here doesn´t want to be spoiled.
I dont mind seeing pics, even though I'm NOT gonna watch the clips:).... I'd also like to see a pic of Spidey during the crane-sequence (something that I haven't already seen in the trailer!)... Just wanna see how it looks.
 
Why?Because he didnt went word-for-word from the comics?You clearly have issues and i still dont understand what the hell are you doing here badmouthing in EVERY possible post

No because the spider-man stories have never been all about MJ, as the movies have you believe (go see sm1):o
One of the things about PP is that his life is all about growth and how he deals with his relationships with people. That, includes GIRLS! :whatever: . Exploring love interests would have made the films more tolerable and given more depth to Peter's character. 4 of spidey's love interests from the comics could have been explored in the form of, Liz, Betty, MJ and Gwen. Had te films been subject to better writing and pacing this could hae been acievable but no, Rami feeds us this bull crap about Peter pining over MJ since the dawn of time and people lke you lap it up without question, get real :whatever:

As for badmouthing in all of my posts, pfft, you clearly can't read, go buy yourself a clue:o
 
Well read my edit....i'm saying exactly the opposite...4 love interests.??? what is he Casanova?No way it works...he will be put up like some insecure,selfish guy in the public's eye...personally i hate that they put M.J infront of Gwen but still we get Gwen in the 3 so i'm happy about it
 
Because Sam Raimi lacks the ability to tell spider-man's story properly and within the means of 3 films.

Raimi was going to use Gwen first. In fact he wanted to do the "Night Gwen Stacy Died" story for Spidey 1. You can thank Avi Arad for the bass-ackward tale we got.
 
I dont mind seeing pics, even though I'm NOT gonna watch the clips:).... I'd also like to see a pic of Spidey during the crane-sequence (something that I haven't already seen in the trailer!)... Just wanna see how it looks.

I show you 3:
bscap127po0.jpg


bscap142tr1.jpg


bscap130fb0.jpg


Sorry for quality but this were the best I could get
 
I loved all of the clips!!! It was an excellent find!!!! It gets me extremely hyped for the film!!!
 
Well read my edit....i'm saying exactly the opposite...4 love interests.??? what is he Casanova?No way it works...he will be put up like some insecure,selfish guy in the public's eye...personally i hate that they put M.J infront of Gwen but still we get Gwen in the 3 so i'm happy about it

Going out with 4 girls hardly makes anyone casanova. :whatever:

If you bothered to familiarise your self with the source material you'd know that Peter, in the early comics was known to be very insecure, selfish and spiteful at times, it's what madehi character so accessible because he wasn't the saintlike character the movis mae him out to be. He was like every other kid who wanted to date girls, make people jealous and show off to others...in 3 movies with quality writing that uses the source material as a blue print, this could easly have been done. :o
 
Going out with 4 girls hardly makes anyone casanova. :whatever:

If you bothered to familiarise your self with the source material you'd know that Peter, in the early comics was known to be very insecure, selfish and spiteful at times, it's what madehi character so accessible because he wasn't the saintlike character the movis mae him out to be. He was like every other kid who wanted to date girls, make people jealous and show off to others...in 3 movies with quality writing that uses the source material as a blue print, this could easly have been done. :o

Well in a movie world it does...the 4 love interests were in comic book in a period of 13 years and you want that in 3 movies?
And Parker selfish...when?everything wrong he did he cursed himself for it,he sacrifised his live to save everyone he loved,especially Aunt May and you call him selfish?and every relashionship he had before Gwen and M.J didnt work out because he was scared to share his secret not because he didnt care for the girl....:o
 
I have pics of the symbiot mask in the bell tower but I don´t know if I should post it because some people here doesn´t want to be spoiled.

well, i would love to see it. if you decide not to,could you please pm it to me?:yay:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,272
Messages
22,077,988
Members
45,878
Latest member
Remembrance1988
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"