Pink Ranger
The North Remembers
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2004
- Messages
- 34,699
- Reaction score
- 1,867
- Points
- 103
Hooper is a mediocre director who goes after safe Oscar-bait movies. His win on King's Speech was an undeserved fluke.
Him winning best director over Fincher I thought was a bigger fluke, and I was the one who had no issues with him getting nominated that year.
Because I had the same mentality that FNJ was talking about with the DGA's. Hooper got nominated but he won't win.
I see the first scene in the movie, where we set down and see the prisoners pulling the ship. Why couldnt we see more shots like that.
The idea that Hooper has no chance of winning the DGA and Oscar is baffling to me. Very few thought he'd win for The King's Speech and he did, why say he has no chance now?
And answer me this, does anybody think he deserves near back to back wins for best director? Is he really one of the greatest directors of all time? Because that's what the Oscars will be saying if he wins again. And make no mistake, he does have a shot because the Oscars love baity films.

This year his competition is much more than it was his last time. Last time he had David Fincher. This time he has Steven Spielberg, Ang Lee, and Ben Affleck.
With all the material at my disposal, it was relatively easy. But basically because it was more of a personal tale along with everything else at my disposal - the music videos I used for a lot of inspiration as well.
I've always seen black box as theater without props really are very minimalistic. For example the bus in Holiday was more of a box rather than a bus. Also whereas all the musicals I've seen the location props change to establish setting, here it always remained the same except for a mattress and sofa.
I really can't say a lot other than I headed in to not only make it the best film version, but an ultimate Green Day experience as well.
Whether you're a fan of Hooper or not (and there's much to be said for both), this article and the corresponding poll at the moment his hilarious.
While the article rips the movie, the fans of the musical, and is basically throwing their hands in the air that anyone liked this thing, the poll at the top asks readers to vote whether or not that loved or hated Les Mis.
The current results? 96% loved it, 4% hated it.![]()
Pretty harsh. I actually agree that Hooper should not get a nomination. Then again, I thought he did not deserve it, much less the win, for 2010. His style is bland and at times distracting. However, the condescension in that piece is ripe. Not unlike the kind in Denby's New Yorker piece. Les Mis is still a good movie, no matter how much snobbery you throw at it.
Still a funny read. I do agree that some apologize for the direction too much because they love the music, acting and/or story. But then again, Hooper helped make that still tangible in the movie.
How is the direction bad? Curious.
It was Hooper's direction that gave us this movie. The actors doing all the singing on set, performing as if its a "normal" acting performance only singing with all the ticks, subtitles, looks, etc. one associates with acting. All him. He directed Hathaway to her (soon to be) Oscar-winning performance. Can't say, "Oh... that was just her!" No, she couldn't have gotten to what she achieved in that film without him.
DGAs were announced today. Heard nothing but ******** Tarantino fanboys whining about his being "snubbed" for Django Unchained over Hooper and Lee for Life of Pi. But those were frankly better directed and showed more directorial restraint (i.e. the pointless, final 20 minutes of Django). I don't see a problem with the 5 directors nominated.
Feel like people are taking issue with Hooper just because its trendy (Remaining resentment of King's Speech beating Social Network? If so, GET OVER IT!) and "everyone else does it."
i dont care for the oscars and i think Leo was in a lot of oscar bait movies. lost a lot respect for him in those years.
but for the love of god give him the oscar for Calvin Candie. he acted how i hope he would in the last 10 years. do you know the story behind the blood on his hand?
i understand this. but leo took a bi chance for being in a Tarantino movie. give him the oscar and by that tell him that he will get awards for acting outside the box and not following the old rules.Leo was good as Candie no doubt, but there are many better this year. Tommy Lee Jones in Lincoln was better, Hoffman in the Master was better, heck, as far as villainy goes, even Javier Bardem in Skyfall was better. I also think he was bested in his own film by Waltz and Samuel Jackson.
BAFTA NOMINATIONS
OUTSTANDING DEBUT BY A BRITISH WRITER, DIRECTOR OR PRODUCER
BART LAYTON (Director), DIMITRI DOGANIS (Producer) The Imposter
DAVID MORRIS (Director), JACQUI MORRIS (Director/Producer) McCullin
DEXTER FLETCHER (Director/Writer), DANNY KING (Writer) Wild Bill
JAMES BOBIN (Director) The Muppets
TINA GHARAVI (Director/Writer) I Am Nasrine
