Why limit it to female roles? Lana should've been Gaston! It would've been hot.![]()
Lana as Darth Vader in Pink
Why limit it to female roles? Lana should've been Gaston! It would've been hot.![]()
It's easy to forget but this is network TV. There are reasonable restrictictions on the amount of characters that do come down to cost. Why do you think we've spent all this time in Neverland with not so much as a peak at Maine so far?
I still don't understand how people think S2 wasn't character-based.
Its less nostalgia for me and more plain ass boredom i get from Regina. If they're not careful she will end up like Sue Sylvester
At least not the seasons after the first one.Don't even ****ing invoke that show's name in this thread.
Joanna Garcia confirmed nothing we didn't already know from promos/the preview clip. We don't know anything about the context.
But sure, commence Primal dropping some Lima Heights gifs and Milos acting as Regina's sole cheerleader.![]()
I said that there would be an imminent freak out about Ursula/Regina and I was right. Just as I am right about double dipping with the villains being a cost saving measure as much as a creative decision. This is something that's been done since season one so I find the pissing and moaning about it now quite funny.
Look, I know that a lot of you grew up just loving the fabu *****iness of many a classic Disney villain, but from the start the show has gone it's own way. The horse left the barn a long time ago friends. And, yes, not having to show what's going on in Maine does free up budget for adventures in NL. The show runs on money, not Fairy Dust people. And on network tv, money is at a premium these days.
I just find it funny, this sense of... Offense and entitlement that is so casually thrown around here. We got people saying "It's like there are no other villains in any realms. All we have seen is Rumple and Regina." Call them out on that OBVIOUS hyperbolic statement and show that, yeah, there has been a steady continual use of other villains throughout the show since season one and you get "Well, of course I didn't mean villains of the week." Yeah... Listen, I have a gut feeling that this comes down to childhood attachements, plain and simple. Mal is cool to have as a background character and all, most would seem to be okay with the alterations with to quite a few tales but for the 90's kids, those that were children during the return to cultural significance of Disney's animated films, the emotional power of a character like Ursala looms large in the unconscious. I get that. But it's nothing the show has not done before.
I can't believe that character even has a devoted fanbase. She's so flat-out unlikable.