marvellover
Civilian
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2015
- Messages
- 195
- Reaction score
- 4
- Points
- 13
I can totally see many of comic book fans are not going to be very happy after watching the film
I can totally see many of comic book fans are not going to be very happy after watching the film
Based on what?
...of course I understand that. In fact Whedon's personal "touch" is even more obvious in The Avengers and AoU since Whedon is both director and writer.
What I'm concerned with is
a) As you stated, Joss has little concern for continuity in not only the solo movies but in The Avengers...which he also wrote and
b) These aren't 100% original stories/characters and he should be somewhat faithful to the source material, and by extension, the fans.
doesn't have to be Liv Tyler! we didn't have to have Norton to have a good portrayal of the Hulk
My response wasn't aimed at you - sorry for the misunderstanding. I was supporting your previous statement and this one here!
Liv Tyler wouldn't be a great match for Ruffalo so I would support Marvel recasting the character.
Seems like a bit of an overreaction to something you have no first hand knowledge or experience with. People seem to be so tense and antsy for this film that any news they don't like is like a death knell for them in their possible enjoyment of the film. I don't get the point in getting so worked up for something they've yet to experience.Exactly!!! I'm a Hulk fan as well and after days of reading this, it's become clear!! Wheedon could care less about the Hulk and how he's portrayed on screen!! This movie seems to be total b.s.!! I would rather he had not been in it then to be reduced to a mindless ape who gets knocked out by iron man then runs away before the final battle.. That's not the Hulk!! That's B.s.!! This isn't Buffy the vampire slayer.. This is one of the most powerful figures in the marvel universe!! If he can't be done right.. Then leave him alone!!
Based upon french reviews, Ruffalo's Hulk isn't really discussed which is a combination of other characters getting their deserved spotlight but also based upon what the story around him seems to be. The only comments about him are related on whether they liked the romance or not.
And that's the thing. We have been told that Feige is happy that people walked out with Hulk as favorite from first Avengers, Joss Whedon stated that he and Hawkeye were the characters he didn't want in this phase of movies because he had 'big plans' for them in AOU. And so far, the only thing that we're getting from the story is a romance and then leaving the Avengers. Is that really all there is with him in this story? Those were the big plans Joss had?
Hulk didn't even talk much, so that's out of the window? I am glad that Hawkeye and others got spotlight, but Whedon seems to have taken his former running start away from him in order to do that. This is only going to add to people stating that there is nothing left to do with his character.
A romance is a big part of the story though.
Seems like a bit of an overreaction to something you have no first hand knowledge or experience with. People seem to be so tense and antsy for this film that any news they don't like is like a death knell for them in their possible enjoyment of the film. I don't get the point in getting so worked up for something they've yet to experience.
So does Tony use his brainwaves at all to build Ultron like Hank did with his? Or base Ultron's personality from him? Just wondering cause of all the quips and snark that Ultron seems to be having in this universe.
Not really. The Scepter had a whole AI inside, way more complex than JARVIS, and Stark was just trying meshing the two of them together to create the ultimate AI. They never said he used his brainwaves.Yes he did.
Anyway, that whole Scepter thing was confusing to me. First it has an super AI inside of it, then there's a gem inside, then it fires blue lasers, then it turns people into servants... Yeesh... Just pick something and stick with it.
I think they hadn't initially planned on the scepter containing an Infinity Gem. didn't they use to say it was powered by the Tesseract? that's why its powers - and color - are all over the place.
IS Quicksilver going to come back? Can't he heal fast?
IS Quicksilver going to come back? Can't he heal fast?
I assume he will at some point. don't they all?
but in the film he is clearly dead. the people who claimed Maria Hill mentioned quick healing as one of QS's powers were mistaken, as we saw in the clip they released with her talking to Cap.
King dork did you see the movie? Is it good? One a scale of 1 to 10 with Winter Soldier being a 9 and Avengers 1 being a 7, what would you give this movie? Was Ultron just another villain?
Also, how cool was Vision on a scale of 1 to 10?
Let's not waste a good Dr. Strange movie with a "let's bring back Pietro" storyline, shall we?
Yeah I saw it last Tuesday. I give this movie as solid 8. Flaws here and there from a narrative standpoints, so SOO damn satisfying, albeit there was a lot of things to take in on first viewing.
And Vision was awesome. 9 out 10 for him alone.
Are we thor fans gonna be satisfied with his power showing?He levels an entire City right?
King dork did you see the movie? Is it good? One a scale of 1 to 10 with Winter Soldier being a 9 and Avengers 1 being a 7, what would you give this movie? Was Ultron just another villain?
Also, how cool was Vision on a scale of 1 to 10?