Am I the only one who sicks of hearing about 9/11

Well, hate to break it to ya, but humanity as a whole commemorates horrific events, especially on specific anniversaries (usually divisible by 5). Always have, always will.

You don't like that, tough ****. And if you want the people dying today to get more exposure, expose them yourself.
 
droogiedroogie2 said:
Yeah, I'm totally sick of the 9/11 bull****. I'm a college student in a small Kansas town. The people that died were the commanders of financial hegemony and oppression around the world, living and working in New York City. I had nothing in common with them. If one were to select people that deserved to die, if one believed that anyone ever deserves to die, one might start with people like them, and probably religious oppressors and political figureheads.

Why should I care about this event? It's not the event that bothers me. It's the impacts, the way it was used to justify evil that was astounding, even by the standards of the USA. I will mourn those impacts, those abuses of the event, every day for the rest of my life. But I won't sit around pretending to be moved by something that doesn't bother me, just because it happened five years ago today.

Look everybody it's one of those college know it all hippies :o
 
Cyclops said:
You don't like that, tough ****. And if you want the people dying today to get more exposure, expose them yourself.

It's a two way street. People have the right not to really care about events that happened 5, 10, or 20 years ago. So if you or anyone else doesn't like it then it's tough ***** right back at you, isn't it?
 
hitmanyr2k said:
It's a two way street. People have the right not to really care about events that happened 5, 10, or 20 years ago. So if you or anyone else doesn't like it then it's tough ***** right back at you, isn't it?

you have the right not to care... but to sit there and comlpain about hearing about it is crossing the line...
 
Cyclops said:
Well, hate to break it to ya, but humanity as a whole commemorates horrific events, especially on specific anniversaries (usually divisible by 5). Always have, always will.

You don't like that, tough ****. And if you want the people dying today to get more exposure, expose them yourself.
NoooOOOOO!!!:eek:
Don't expose the dead today!!!
 
droogiedroogie2 said:
Yeah, I'm totally sick of the 9/11 bull****. I'm a college student in a small Kansas town. The people that died were the commanders of financial hegemony and oppression around the world, living and working in New York City. I had nothing in common with them. If one were to select people that deserved to die, if one believed that anyone ever deserves to die, one might start with people like them, and probably religious oppressors and political figureheads.

Why should I care about this event? It's not the event that bothers me. It's the impacts, the way it was used to justify evil that was astounding, even by the standards of the USA. I will mourn those impacts, those abuses of the event, every day for the rest of my life. But I won't sit around pretending to be moved by something that doesn't bother me, just because it happened five years ago today.

My god, the fact that people (in Kansas of all people) truly believe that (that these people deserved to die) sicken me. I wish Kent Clark was real to stick a boot in your ass.

P.S. dude, if you want to see what you have in common with them - look at what you just wrote. You have the write to say that, because you live in a free country, because you live in America - they once shared that with you.
 
Ok, guys, it's time to calm the heck down. droogiedroogie2 has a right to say what he thinks, no matter how distasteful, as long as it does not violate the rules. If you disagree with him and believe he is a troll then click ignore and don't read his posts. Conversely, droogiedroogie2, you have come in here obviously to cause conflict, which is trolling and/of flaming. So perhaps it is best for everyone that that particular avenue of conversation be dropped.

Or, I can just start banning people. You guys choose.
 
[FONT=&quot]
JokerNick said:
the other thing that comes to mind is just plain stupidity.... unable to understand what happened that day...
What happened that day was, a group of Islamic terrorists launched an unjustified, unprovoked attack against the symbol of American financial oppression around the world. They did so, more than likely, because they or people they knew, or maybe just people they represented and acted on behalf of, were sick of the USA and the rest of the West foisting themselves on everyone else. Why, was there something that I missed?

JokerNick said:
we remember this day so we don't forget
Why don't we remember the day we aided a coup in Guatemala, setting in motion a chain of events that would cause a civil war to ravage the nation, literally setting neighbor against neighbor, and causing instability that persists to this day? I'd say that's something we shouldn't forget, but most people never learned about it in the first place, so they don't even know what to remember.

We're always happy to ***** and whine and "remember" the things other people do to us. But we're never ready to acknowledge our own mistakes, mistakes that are often the reason people go after us in the first place! Maybe if we spent more time remembering and atoning for our own ****ups, we wouldn't have had a 9/11 to mourn in the first place. Or are you gonna come back with that old chestnut about the terrorists are irrational, rabid animals who hate our freedoms?

JokerNick said:
today should be taken to remember all those who lost their lives.... ITS CALLED RESPECT
Respect for the dead only applies to the dead you knew. I have no reason to respect dead Nazis. I don't respect Hitler, even though the mother****er's one dead-ass sonofa*****. Got no respect for Nixon. No respect for suicide bombers. No respect for Israeli soldiers that died perpetrating state-sponsored terrorism "because they were ordered to." Respect is earned, it's not just given because you ****in' died.

WorthyStevens4 said:
Over 2000 people were killed that day. I guess you just don't understand how awful that was, and how they should all be remembered.
Nope. And I don't either. Perhaps, while we're doing this whole remembering-the-tragedy thing, we should set aside a day to remember all the Iraqis who were victimized by the UN sanctions regime, because their leader was an international *******. How about remembering the villages that were destroyed, in order to be saved, in Vietnam, by US forces? Should August 6 be remembered as the day 80,000 people died in Hiroshima, with the following weeks remembered as the period of time during which 60,000 more died of complications resulting from the bombing? We'd have to make room for August 9, when we'd commemorate 74,000 deaths in Nagasaki, followed by another 214,000. Hell, we don't even remember Oklahoma City anymore, because it was one of our guys that did it.

We don't bother with that stuff, Steve, because if we did we'd feel so terrible about ourselves and what we've condoned by way of our votes, that we'd shut down. That stuff is depressing. Better to only commemorate the times when we lost. Gives us something to rally around, a reason to feel morally justified, and righteous. We weren't the aggressors! Not this time! But what about all the other times? Why don't we remember those? Is this how the dead wish to be remembered? As no more than cheap political tools? Because that's what it is, no matter how much you spout about keeping it apolitical. The dead should be remembered by the families who lost them. The rest of us should just ****ing be honest. It's none of our ****ing business whether some random dead guy gets remembered, except to note that there was a reason that structure was selected.

Wilhelm-Scream said:
Erm, wrong wrong wrong ******ed wrong.
Such compelling argumentation. You scintillate today, Watson.

Wilhelm-Scream said:
Do you know how many janitors, baristas, lowly temps and receptionists you're talking about? In the WTC?
Suppose I'd have to view employment records. Why? Just because you do a lowly job for someone, that means you're not facilitating that person? If those lowly workers would have had the courage to stand up to injustice--and many workers and unions have had that courage over the past 150 years--who knows what a simple strike could have accomplished? That inaction is what makes all of us guilty.

If a terrorist kills me tomorrow, I should be remembered as just another socialist loudmouth who never put his money where his mouth was because he was too damned comfortable staying put right where he was. No one better use me as some nationalistic rally point. No one who never knew me better "remember" my death--it won't mean a ****ing thing to you! You'll be doing it to feel good about yourself, to feel compassionate. Tons of people die all over the world every day, just not in one fell swoop. Remembering these deaths is like remembering ol' Dan Hubbard of Stump****, PA, who just passed away of a heart failure.

Wilhelm-Scream said:
I know you got goosebumps and a stiffy typing that
Oh, I surely did. I'm cramming my cock into a CD drive, right now.

C'mon. Can't you come up with a more original way of accusing someone of intellectual self-gratification?

Wilhelm-Scream said:
but it's just safer to say, nobody should get blown up at work unless they have a say in deciding to do the things that caused the beef in the first place.
No, you're quite right. No one deserves to die. But if they did, it would be the people that have helped create the single biggest problem in the world. Like, ifthere was one guy who caused AIDS, as some epidemiologists posit, and you could find him, wouldn't some part of you want to kill the mother****er? Just be like, "Dude, ****ing monkeys isn't cool in the first place, but then you had to bring the most horrific STD in history down upon your fellow human? Not cool, bro!"

JokerNick said:
and no one is forcing you to watch these movies, listen to these radio stations.... do what I do, and don't partake in anything like that.... if it offends you, ignore it....
Oh, right, ignore it so it will go away. Isn't that what our parents used to tell us about monsters under the bed? See, that only works for fictional characters, Nicky. Not reality. The whole problem in this country is people like you, who just ignore all the bad stuff and hope it goes away. Well, it doesn't. It keeps happening, and then, someday, out of nowhere, a guy comes along who got tired of you ignoring the way he and his family have been screwed over, and he flies a plane into your place of employment.[/FONT]
 
Dew k. Mosi said:
Ok, guys, it's time to calm the heck down. droogiedroogie2 has a right to say what he thinks, no matter how distasteful, as long as it does not violate the rules. If you disagree with him and believe he is a troll then click ignore and don't read his posts. Conversely, droogiedroogie2, you have come in here obviously to cause conflict, which is trolling and/of flaming. So perhaps it is best for everyone that that particular avenue of conversation be dropped.

Or, I can just start banning people. You guys choose.
I certainly did not come in with that intention. I resent the sentiment. I had more to say to these vicious attacks that paid no attention to the actual substance of my arguments, but if it's going to get me banned, I guess that's that.
 
I wouldn't call it crossing the line, just pointless. It's not like they are going to stop. We still commemorate Pearl Harbor, this will be no different. I'm sure it will be remembered for many years to come. You can ***** about it all you want...won't change a thing.
 
Dew k. Mosi said:
Ok, guys, it's time to calm the heck down. droogiedroogie2 has a right to say what he thinks, no matter how distasteful, as long as it does not violate the rules. If you disagree with him and believe he is a troll then click ignore and don't read his posts. Conversely, droogiedroogie2, you have come in here obviously to cause conflict, which is trolling and/of flaming. So perhaps it is best for everyone that that particular avenue of conversation be dropped.

Or, I can just start banning people. You guys choose.

well considering that some uneducated guy, is coming on the boards, stating how the poeple of 9/11 were rightfully killed because they worked there, i don;t, sounds like a troll, because there is no way that someone could actually beleive that...
 
I am not sick of hearing about 9/11. I think we all should take time and reflect on this horrific event in our history as a nation - and not just on anniversaries divisible by 5. What does bother me, though, is the fact that the attacks on Pearl Harbor on December 7th, 1941 are often overlooked. No, that day did not occur during our lifetime, but that fact does not lessen its significance to both our history; after all, it was an act of war.
That's not to say that Dec. 7 1941 is any more significant than 9/11; rather, they are each significant in their own respective ways.
 
I SEE SPIDEY said:
Please, propaganda anyone? Bush and other people who constantly want people to feel sorry for america and get away with it's crimes because of that day, are the people who show an utter lack of respect for all those who died.


So move to Australia... :whatever:
 
Dew k. Mosi said:
Ok, guys, it's time to calm the heck down. droogiedroogie2 has a right to say what he thinks, no matter how distasteful, as long as it does not violate the rules. If you disagree with him and believe he is a troll then click ignore and don't read his posts. Conversely, droogiedroogie2, you have come in here obviously to cause conflict, which is trolling and/of flaming. So perhaps it is best for everyone that that particular avenue of conversation be dropped.

Or, I can just start banning people. You guys choose.
I dont even see an ignore button...where is it?
 
It's an option under each user's profile.
 
Sentinel X said:
I dont even see an ignore button...where is it?
ooh, that would be haunting, like, I never saw "The Man With The X-Ray Eyes", but I just read the other day that the problem with him was, he could see through his eyelids, so he was longing to be able to shut his eyes.
but, if his X-Ray vision was that potent, it seems like, he'd just see through everything, so, what would he see? Nothing, so he'd be blind.

:confused:
 
Wilhelm-Scream said:
ooh, that would be haunting, like, I never saw "The Man With The X-Ray Eyes", but I just read the other day that the problem with him was, he could see through his eyelids, so he was longing to be able to shut his eyes.
but, if his X-Ray vision was that potent, it seems like, he'd just see through everything, so, what would he see? Nothing, so he'd be blind.

:confused:
you just blew my mind
 
Wilhelm-Scream said:
ooh, that would be haunting, like, I never saw "The Man With The X-Ray Eyes", but I just read the other day that the problem with him was, he could see through his eyelids, so he was longing to be able to shut his eyes.
but, if his X-Ray vision was that potent, it seems like, he'd just see through everything, so, what would he see? Nothing, so he'd be blind.

:confused:

Doesn't Lead block X-Ray?
 
Wilhelm-Scream said:
ooh, that would be haunting, like, I never saw "The Man With The X-Ray Eyes", but I just read the other day that the problem with him was, he could see through his eyelids, so he was longing to be able to shut his eyes.
but, if his X-Ray vision was that potent, it seems like, he'd just see through everything, so, what would he see? Nothing, so he'd be blind.

:confused:

Are you suggesting that blind people are in fact gifted with extremely powerful X-Ray vision? That their problem is not that they see nothing, but that they see too much to be able to make sense of anything? ;)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"