moraldeficiency
Maxwell's Demon
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2007
- Messages
- 9,471
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Symbolism in comics is all well and good, but not if something being detailed for the sake of symbolism compromises the integrity of the standard to which the title has come to be expected, and/ or insults its readers intelligence.
JMS- one of his main problems is that far too often he is solely concerned w/ the grand concept behind his story and what HE wants to do in the arc. To hell w/ whether its actually possible in terms of past continuity, whether it means he just has to invent things up that never happened or even if it means he writes PP doing stuff he would never do.
You see Im not asking that everything be in back issues that is revealed in current issues.
But to just pluck something out of nowhere like that PP had already developed a batch of web fluid back in the day that lasted for long periods of time- months/years is bad writing.
Its JMS just making something up to get his turd to float.
Why is it bad writing?
Because we all known Spideys original webbing only lasted an hour.
If he had ever developed a batch that could last as long as months up to years then this would certainly be enough of a significant event that we would have seen him do so in the comics.
The mere fact that in a Q&A recently when a board member asked him about the webbings life span in #539 he replied by saying Spider-mans original duration of the webbing was long-term, proves he does not even know the source material.
It may be a comic about a guy w/ proportionate spider powers, but the comics have always been written to a certain standard w/ everything inside the books being justified.
So your symbolism over reason argument does not have any legs.
Now I could mention about a million times in back issues that show science being thrown to the wind for the sake of continuing a plot line but you know them as well as I do I'm sure. I agree that a standard should be made but I'm willing to accept a lot if it provides the story with depth and dimension. We obviously disagree on this. It's just that I need more story and that story shouldn't just be written to entertain little kids and science nerds. I thought that the last ASM (despite bothering errors) was the first issue to get back on track of an actual story that's character driven based on emotions, which has always been Bug's appeal (at least to me).
While I agree the one hour thing has been a staple I have also seen bugs experiment with it and get some different results. You'll forgive me for not having the issues handy (I'm at work) but he did invent a webbing that was too strong for his web shooters that required diamond cutters to break (where he got that I have no idea) I also remember on a very odd storyline (I believe it was in WOSM) he designed a webbing battle suit made of a hardened web substance (it was later disolved by plant man) that was much more durable and lasted much longer than an hour. Look I'm not saying I buy it completely, it was a copout answer, but I'll take it with a grain of salt and say the imagery was worth the little tick in the back of my mind.
Unfortunately there's always gonna be errors. Unavoidable. Hopefully they'll step up their checks and balances but if everyone's gonna let some errors ruin a great story than you're in for a long miserable hall reading marvel.