Flash525
The Scarlet Messenger
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2018
- Messages
- 6,294
- Reaction score
- 2,727
- Points
- 78
I guess it depends on the person then; but I can't imagine everyone who visited this park would be that way inclined. Would it be unfair to say some people just wanted a western retreat?What happened to William was his interaction with Dolores. He fell in love and tried to "save" her. He thought he was living out Pretty Woman. Though a very good example of someone without bad intentions whose worst nature is brought out by the park.
Also, Emily was a little girl when she originally went. Looking for a way to connect to her father. A clear intention that of course lead to the pleasure houses. Because that is what these places are.
True, but to refer back to a previous reference of yours - this isn't isn't rape. Before the hosts became sentient, they were just tools - no different to a sex doll or rampant rabbit (though granted, far more sophisticated). The hosts (especially those in the pleasure houses) were programmed to accommodate guests sexually, and so they did.The physical interaction in the point. So it is very different. This isn't being a space marine. Its about interacting on a physical level. It is like the concept of Jurassic Park. You could have a movie about dinosaurs or you could actually go and see dinosaurs. The inherent difference that leads to the actual problems of the park.
Sure, there were no doubt some people that visited the park and had sexual interactions with hosts otherwise not of the pleasure house, but for all involve purposes, they would just playing with a computer. It wasn't rape until the hosts became sentient. Otherwise, in ten or fifteen years time, if a sex doll is suddenly upgraded with a consciousness and accuses it's owner of rape, there's automatically a case there? No!