Majik1387
Avenger
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2004
- Messages
- 41,629
- Reaction score
- 4
- Points
- 33
Eh, you never know.Yes, but we are clearly not going to see syringes.
And for how much people don't want the tubes on here, he's got to take the Venom somehow.
Eh, you never know.Yes, but we are clearly not going to see syringes.
Injection to the blood stream is the fastest way of absorption. How do you want the venom to be absorbed? Sublingual, oral, inhalation like the fear toxin, or anal?Yes, but we are clearly not going to see syringes.
They could do the tube system, but make it smaller, like a constant intravenous or something. People have to walk around with those things all the time, he could construct one that's inconspicuous.
Injection to the blood stream is the fastest way of absorption. How do you want the venom to be absorbed? Sublingual, oral, inhalation like the fear toxin, or anal?
lets just not make the green venom glow because that be kind of lameI would accept that,Especially if the venom/liquid inside the syringe is green and it's refer d as Venom like as a code name or something!

Your stupid if you think Nolan will use a man injecting himself in a batman film, and are clearly forgetting the fact that alot of children will be seeing this.
I might be the millionth person to suggest this, but I'd really like to see Bane presented in the same vein as Anton Chigurh (Javier Bardem's character in No Country for Old Men). Bane hasn't struck me as a character that should have the wordy dialogue scenes like the Joker and Batman did in TDK. He seems cool, calm, and calculating. The more I think about it, you could have made Josh Brolin in No Country wear a batsuit, have Bardem gain 100 lbs. and set the movie in Gotham, and you'd have a helluva cat-and-mouse battle of wits between Bane and Batman.
It's not like he'd be glorifying taking super steroids.
Did he glorify Ra or Joker's terrorist actions? Or Two-Face's revenge? or Scarecrow's fear inducing to feel superior? No.



well then...appears i'm a ****ing moron.
Carry on, sir.
It's not like he'd be glorifying taking super steroids.
Did he glorify Ra or Joker's terrorist actions? Or Two-Face's revenge? or Scarecrow's fear inducing to feel superior? No.
Don't worry about that. Your suggestion is not out of line at all. The Batman series is not really for kids anyway so Nolan having a character injecting himself in no way advocates that type of activity.
Your stupid if you think Nolan will use a man injecting himself in a batman film, and are clearly forgetting the fact that alot of children will be seeing this.
Yes yes yes....
Joker can murder people by the dozens, slash people's mouths with knives, and blow up a hospital...all kid friendly.
BUT Bane injecting a fictional drug.........HIDE THE KIDS!!!!!!!!1111!!!!1 ZOMGS ZOINKS T3H EVIL![]()
Don't worry about that. Your suggestion is not out of line at all. The Batman series is not really for kids anyway so Nolan having a character injecting himself in no way advocates that type of activity.
I think its a little different seeing a man whos a terrorist, Fear gas, A man blowing ships up and such to a man getting a syringe and shooting up.
It's one thing to see your child pretend to be the scarecrow with his fear gas, its another seeing them say 'mum look at me i'm taking venom' The tubes on the other hand give it more of a fantasty element i'm sure Warners will be fine with, though i'm not sure Nolan will want that.
Nolan can take the films up to a realistic level as he likes but the word Batman will still be linked with children, children will still want to see this, Parents will kick up a massive fuss if we see a man shoot up in what is really supposed to be a family film.
It's finding the happy medium, i'm personally not sure what that is, but i'm certain it wont be a syringe.

It isn't different.I think its a little different seeing a man whos a terrorist, Fear gas, A man blowing ships up and such to a man getting a syringe and shooting up.
"Look at me mom! I'm blowing up these ships! I also stabbed a guy in the face with a pencil earlier."It's one thing to see your child pretend to be the scarecrow with his fear gas, its another seeing them say 'mum look at me i'm taking venom' The tubes on the other hand give it more of a fantasty element i'm sure Warners will be fine with, though i'm not sure Nolan will want that.
None of the films thus far have been linked heavily to children, it's not gonna start now.Nolan can take the films up to a realistic level as he likes but the word Batman will still be linked with children, children will still want to see this, Parents will kick up a massive fuss if we see a man shoot up in what is really supposed to be a family film.
I've seen many people here, myself included(convinced Nolan wouldn't use Bane), certain about things for TDKR. Majority of them, myself included, have been wrong.It's finding the happy medium, i'm personally not sure what that is, but i'm certain it wont be a syringe.
Do you not think many people will hear the word Batman and associate it as a child friendly character. Just because we have read more adult material like Killing Joke & Arkham Asylum and know him as more of a adult character compared to say Superman.
Alot of the general audience still associates Batman with family friendly superhero.
Well, Batman actually IS for kids if you want to get technical. We as adults have just taken over the comic book world for our own, is all.
Yes yes yes....
Joker can murder people by the dozens, slash people's mouths with knives, and blow up a hospital...all kid friendly.
BUT Bane injecting a fictional drug.........HIDE THE KIDS!!!!!!!!1111!!!!1 ZOMGS ZOINKS T3H EVIL![]()