ghoulstock
Civilian
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2011
- Messages
- 78
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 1
Really, there is only one obvious choice for this part:
Last edited:
ok *****e
Pretty typical reaction to ANYTHING in these parts.That guy??
![]()

Noomi Rapace for Batman!No need to be rude.
Noomie Rapace would make an awesome Batman. There is a twist that would add another dimension.
I am not discussing with you that he will cast the role or not. I am just saying that he's an actor, and that he played in a lot of movies, He's more than just a stunt man. And don't call him a meat heat, that just says more about you than himYes , but a lot those with good looks are also very good actors .
Adkins is a Stuntman/Martial artist.
He is not qualified to be Batman and he will NOT be cast in the role.
I don't either. And not all opinions are equal because some are uninformed. When I say I disagree with someone about a film, it's not meant as a personal insult...unless I call you dumb for liking a film. I admit that is obviously a personal insult that I mostly only use when I am frustrated and I am not proud of that fact.I don't understand the idea that the general entitlement to an opinion means that no opinion may be criticized.
Oh well.
I think you've been clear about that in the past and most people understand that. It's just every now and then you get someone who doesn't know everyone here and is extra-sensitive/defensive about their opinions and take it personally if anyone is critical of them. That's sadly unavoidable, especially in a thread like this when everyone has their "horse" that they are rooting for, lol.I don't either. And not all opinions are equal because some are uninformed. When I say I disagree with someone about a film, it's not meant as a personal insult...unless I call you dumb for liking a film. I admit that is obviously a personal insult that I mostly only use when I am frustrated and I am not proud of that fact.
You would actually make me enjoy Superman punching Batman.
You are probably right. Maybe I shouldn't get so mad about being accused of only caring about box office numbers and the entitled to your opinion deal.I think you've been clear about that in the past and most people understand that. It's just every now and then you get someone who doesn't know everyone here and is extra-sensitive/defensive about their opinions and take it personally if anyone is critical of them. That's sadly unavoidable, especially in a thread like this when everyone has their "horse" that they are rooting for, lol.
Well Said .I have never wanted an actor for a role because they are hot. At best I've jokingly inferred that. I think that Orlando Bloom is hot but I still think that he is wrong for Batman.
Personally I just see Adkins as wrong for Batman and it seems to me that most of his supporters think that we are fancasting 300 Part 3 instead of MOS 2.
Bingo. People need thicker skin in this place, haha.You are probably right. Maybe I shouldn't get so mad about being accused of only caring about box office numbers and the entitled to your opinion deal.
I am A-Okay with people dissing my Batman choices. I think it's fun and if you can't stand people dissing your choices than get the hell out of here.
Are we all still going on the rumor from BOF that they're going with an older Batman? Wasn't it Snyder himself that said that Superman is the first hero in this universe and it paves the way for other heroes to start announcing themselves to the public? I would think, in that, we'd have a similarly aged Bruce in comparison to Cavill. Also, as someone pointed out, this will be the beginning of a long contract. Would it be possible to maybe make someone look older and go with a younger actor? Not saying he's my pick, but what about Liam Hemsworth? At least its a new name for debate.
All the signs are pointing towards an older Batman. BOF says so, THR says so, the quote Snyder read is from TDKR which features an older Batman.
I'm down with a younger Batman (30-35) no guys in their twenties tho
I'm honestly not so sure about whether WB wanting an older Batman is true. It might be something WB is considering, but it can't be set in stone if they are truly considering guys like Gosling, Goode, Manginiello and Bloom. Even Armitage could probably pass for a guy in his mid-late 30s. Brolin and Martini are the only rumored actors that look older.
I also don't see why WB is supposedly so enamored with Brolin. Sure, he's a good actor, but he's far from a box office draw (Jonah Hex, Gangster Squad, W). Of course, Men in Black 3 did well but that was the third film in an established series that also happened to feature a megastar (Will Smith).
Its a sequel to MOS. The press notes confirm it.
This will deal with the events of MOS. I really really really hope the address the catastrophic almost nuclear damage that happened at the close of the last film - like literally the city was flattened.
I hope to god they don't gloss over it and address it.
Though what does everyone think about the Daily Planet office being intact? Did it escape the destruction?
So what office did Clark join? Was it a make shift one?
Other than one or two more incensed posts after some back and forth with other people, I don't see any blatant race baiting in his posts. Just a differing opinion.
Edit: Honestly, looking back through the thread you're the only one that seems to be throwing the term around.
I think enough of the general public is aware of Batman's backstory to not have to delve too deeply into it. Maybe a few snippets of information here and there could work to indicate what direction Goyer is taking with it, but I don't think the movie needs to devote any real chunk of time to it.
I see no problems with casting an actor in his 20s as Batman. Cavill was in his 20s when they shot MOS.

