Bruce Malone
Superhero
- Joined
- May 23, 2009
- Messages
- 8,216
- Reaction score
- 11
- Points
- 33
Kilmer would've made great dark Batman film....
Damn how low was kidman ducking in this pic? Im pretty sure she's the same height as Kilmer.
Kilmer would've made great dark Batman film....
Ehh that didn't really bother me. The character was still pretty accurate. I think him being a young adult opens up some other avenues too.
Could you really see a 12 year old Robin having that convo with Bruce about revenge? And Dick being like "You can't stop me." and Bruce simply replies "I CAN stop you..." that scene was bad ass.
Damn how low was kidman ducking in this pic? Im pretty sure she's the same height as Kilmer.
Giving a girl flat shoes doesn't make them shorter it makes them their real hight. High heals is cheeting. So unless they gave Keaton a boost as well, Basinger is actally shorter than him but normally wears shoes to make her taller.Well you can't have a tall woman next to Batman. I think it was same for Keaton, Basinger was taller than him but they made her shoes flat so that Keaton would look taller.
Damn how low was kidman ducking in this pic? Im pretty sure she's the same height as Kilmer.
As much as I can appreciate Batman Forever (and i do REALLY like it)... I simply cannot stomach thier take on Two-Face.
Even when I was aged 5, when the movie came out... thanks to Batman: The Animated Series, I knew something was wrong.
-Bad writing
-Bad direction
-Bad acting
-Bad costume
-Bad make-up
I honestly dont know what they were trying to acheive with the character.
Trying to make him less frightening for the little kids and interfering parents.
My most favourite part with Bruce was in Chases office. Where hes looking at the dream protector doll,subtle,but I was moved by just those few seconds of him looking down sadly at the doll...
Kilmer was a fantastic Batman and he really was a great Bruce. He made me want to see more scenes with Bruce than Batman,lol. He just made the character really interesting,not just cause we understood more of him than we did with Michael,but more because of Val himself. The film had elements of camp with the villains (I think this was Shumacers and WB attempt to make them less frightening as Burton got a beating for that with Returns,as younger audiences and family goers were put off). But they tried to bring the more serious stuff in the scenes with Bruce,Chase,Dick,etc and I enjoyed the drama with them, more than the action between Batman and the villains actually.
For the same reason that they gave us a tragic introduction for Robin and a sexually aggressive love interest. They wanted kid-friendly up to a point. I would argue that at this point in time they were still trying not to alienate the fans of the previous installments while at the same time trying to appease Mothers Of America.If they wanted kid-friendly, why did they go with a tragic villiain with a charred face?
Trying to make him less frightening for the little kids and interfering parents.
Kidman was indeed insanely hot. Probably the hottest she has ever been apart from To Die For.