Saint
Avenger
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2003
- Messages
- 13,591
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 56
Obviously he is, or they would not keep saying so. It's not sensible to sell the event the way they have and then not deliver. Stunts like Knightfall and the Death of Superman worked the way they did because those sort of stories had never been told before. Repeating that sort of thing would be inherently flawed, and DC, while fairly stupid sometimes, isn't stupid enough to do that.Reading that summary got me interested but I'll probably wait for the TPB and only if it has lasting repercussions on Batman, you don't really think Bruce Wayne is really quitting being Batman right?
Whether Bruce is gone for one year, two years, or ten years, they obviously mean to do something here that is distinct and significant.
The point of making someone else Batman is to make a new sort of Batman. The "only Bruce can be Batman" argument is inherently flawed, as there is really no quality that qualifies Bruce, exclusively, for the role. The idea that somebody would replace batman has been present in the comics consistently for a long time, so the material supports it. Certainly another Batman would be a different sort of Batman, but then, that is the point: progress, not stagnation.Without Bruce there would be no Batman since he's the major driving force that has made Batman so popular with fans because of his obsession of watching his parents die, many others have doubled for Bats such as Dick Grayson and Azrael but they all have different personalities and don't have that determination that Bruce has.
Honestly, I understand that a lot of people are afraid of the idea that they won't get anymore Bruce Wayne stories. That's fair. That's an unpleasant idea. What I don't understand is that so many people have already determined that, no matter what, they will not like the stories told under the replacement. I don't understand how liking Bruce Wayne precludes one from appreciating a Dick Grayson Batman. Why is that so often the attitude here at the Hype? In order to appreciate one thing you have to hate the alternative?
A lot of people have spoken on how inevitably bad and/or unworkable it will be when Bruce is gone. No one has articulated any particularly satisfying reasons as to why this would be the case.