deathfromabove
Sidekick
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2005
- Messages
- 3,812
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
thanks. i should obviously read the black glove trade first right?
I haven't read Animal Man or Marvel Boy, but what revelations in JLA and X-Men were slipped early in those stories?
The red and black thing has been an ongoing question for me. The fact that the characters in the story are aware of the significance of those colours suggest to me that the villain is something grander than just a simple man, like Thomas Wayne. Batman knows these colours are important. The Joker knows. This means their presence isn't just a thematic thing thrown in by Morrison. Their presence in the world has some purpose within the story. That distinctly suggests something more than human. If these colours were simply thematic, never mentioned by the characters but noticed by the audience, we could assume it's just a stylistic, thematic thing. But the characters acknowledge these colours and their significance, so obviously they have some practical relevance in the story. Why would there be red and black everywhere if we were talking about Thomas Wayne?
thanks. i should obviously read the black glove trade first right?
Usually someone has already leaked it by now
Actually, someone over on the DC message boards named jsquared claims to have a copy already:
Superman saved the world when he left...what's Batman going to do? Get drugged up and hallucinate and have identity issues that he's overcome many times in the comics already?
Sigh.
Batman's absence was handled at least moderately well in KNIGHTQUEST. We'll see how this shakes out. Does anyone believe this is permanent?
http://dcboards.warnerbros.com/web/thread.jspa?threadID=2000172848&tstart=0
This spoiler topic conflicts most of what that topic says. :/
Nope, next summer's DC event arch' The Return Of Bruce Wayne.Does anyone believe this is permanent?
If true, Very.It all sounds terrible!
Does the final issue come out tommorrow?
There were hints? I read it in TPB and already knew the outcome, so I wasn't looking, but I don't know of any hints.Like in Rock of Ages you knew Superman destroying the stone might have reprecussions or in New X-Men when he kept on hinting that Xorn might be Magneto to the point that it was.
Hm. My sensibility doesn't let me see it was something irrelevant.That Joker dialogue about searching for symbolism and such from last issue totally made sense to me as someone familiar with Morrison more than it did as someone familiar with the bat mythos. It could all just be nothing after all a lot of dead bats are black and red since they're covered in blood lol so you know black and red = Batman the entity dies. So I wouldn't really over think it too much cause Morrison always toys with readers.
No doubt.His work is always love or hate.
Bruce might take a vacation but you can bet DC has something cooking in 2009 for Bats' 70th birthday, either that or wait for something big when the next Batman sequel comes out.Batman's absence was handled at least moderately well in KNIGHTQUEST. We'll see how this shakes out. Does anyone believe this is permanent?
Bruce might take a vacation but you can bet DC has something cooking in 2009 for Bats' 70th birthday,
wait...Alfred is really Bruce's dad?? WTF?!