• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

Battle of the Cartoons (Simpsons & South Park vs. Family Guy)

Which do you prefer?

  • Simpsons

  • Futurama

  • South Park

  • Family Guy

  • American Dad


Results are only viewable after voting.
Right, I forget that because someone on an internet message board says a show is a ripoff of another show, it's a fact.

Despite the fact that both shows were different, and had different themes. Especially when the opening credits of one show (Family Ties) clearly show the parents as hippies from the 60's, who then have a child who is a young Republican.

But because both parents have jobs and had three kids- they're a rip off.
 
Stop it you two you're making Scratchy cry!!
 
Addendum said:
Right, I forget that because someone on an internet message board says a show is a ripoff of another show, it's a fact.

Despite the fact that both shows were different, and had different themes. Especially when the opening credits of one show (Family Ties) clearly show the parents as hippies from the 60's, who then have a child who is a young Republican.

But because both parents have jobs and had three kids- they're a rip off.

just drop it dude. he clearly proved he was right with all those "ahahahahahahahahahahaha's" and exclamation points.


please don't beat me, mr. sparkles. :(
 
Addendum said:
Right, I forget that because someone on an internet message board says a show is a ripoff of another show, it's a fact.

Despite the fact that both shows were different, and had different themes. Especially when the opening credits of one show (Family Ties) clearly show the parents as hippies from the 60's, who then have a child who is a young Republican.

But because both parents have jobs and had three kids- they're a rip off.

no, I already stated that similraties between the PLOTS, and character dynamics made it a ripoff I mean, AN IDENTICAL EPISODE for god's sake.

bah, anyway.....
 
sinewave said:
just drop it dude. he clearly proved he was right with all those "ahahahahahahahahahahaha's" and exclamation points.


please don't beat me, mr. sparkles. :(

dude, I laughed because he said I DIDN'T watch the shows. and believe me, I did, I even watched that "movie" they did in england and thought it was the greatest thing since sliced bread, I'm sure If I told you you have never watched the simpsons you'd be just as ready to laugh.



:mad::mad::mad::mad:
 
Addendum said:
You never watched either of these shows.

The mellow 1960s clashed with the conservative 1980s in this generation-gap comedy, which in some ways reflected America's changing values in the Reagan area. President Reagan, in fact, called Family Ties his favorite show. It was set it middle America--Columbus, Ohio--where one-time flower children Elyse and Steve Keaton still espoused the liberal values of the idealistic '60s, although they were now parents and professionals (she an architect, he the manager of public TV station WKS-TV). Their children's ideals were something else. Seventeen-year-old Alex was Mr. Conservative, habitually dressed in suit and tie and with a picture of William F. Buckley, Jr., over his bed. Mallory, 15, was into designer jeans, boys, and drunk food, while cute little Jennifer, 9, just wanted to be a kid. They were a loving family, though the kids never could understand those Bob Dylan records their parents kept playing.

Growing Pains was about a family of five, the Seavers, who lived on Long Island, New York. Jason Seaver was the father, a psychiatrist, who had his practice at home. (From the 1st to the 5th season) Maggie, his wife, was a journalist who worked for the Long Island newspaper in the first three seasons of the sitcom. She got a job as the news anchor for channel 19 news and worked there through the middle of the 5th season when she decided to stay at home. Jason moved his practice out of the house to an office. During the last seasons, she worked at home writing a consumer awareness column for the local newspaper. Together, Maggie and Jason raised four children. They often worried about "who would stay home with the baby" or would "be there for the kids" and the responsibility was often juggled, even fought over, between the two parents but eventually settled. The oldest of the four children was Mike. A dare-devil yet charming, Mike helped Growing Pains ratings shoot sky high and quickly became the 80's pin up boy appearing on cover after cover of teen magazines. The 2nd oldest was Carol. Carol was the complete opposite of Mike. She was a straight "A" student, (a "nerd" according to her brothers), struggling with social obstacles at school, just like most teenage girls. From wanting a nose job, to dealing with the death of her boyfriend, (Sandy, played by Matthew Perry) to tolerating her roommate at Columbia University, Carol added a lot of comedy as well as a serious side to the show. Next was little Ben. Ben was a clever "con-artist" in the beginning and a little more nieve during his teen years, sometimes being his brother's sidekick and other times his worst nightmare.


you forgot about poor little Andrew Keaton and Chrissy Seaver...not to mention Luke. Everybody always overlooks the jump-the-shark add-ons :(
 
Erzengel said:
Stop it you two you're making Scratchy cry!!

well, the thing is , I don't even care that much, I'm just having a slow day at work:o, I don't understand how people get so defensive, the fact that it was ripoff doesn't mean it didn't have funny moments, I used to love family guy when IT FIRST aired, it WAS funny, but then it got LESS funny and eventually it got cancelled.

for some reason people can't deal with that fact, when it got cancelled it was because it wasn't funny anymore, and it's STILL not funny.
 
Lackey said:
you forgot about poor little Andrew Keaton and Chrissy Seaver...not to mention Luke. Everybody always overlooks the jump-the-shark add-ons :(

and leo de caprio:o
 
just because they had a few identical episodes doesn't mean one ripped off the other in terms of actual family structure, characters and series outline. many shows have completely ripped off episode plots throughout the history of sitcoms. how many times have we seen an episode of a show where one character watches another character's pet while they're away and the pet dies and they try and replace it with a similar looking animal to fool the owner? just becuase certain episodes share the same plot and some of the same jokes doesn't mean the creators of the series intentionally and blatantly ripped off another series. i'm actually siding with addendum on this issue. i think family ties and growing pains we're completely different series, aside from them focusing on families in the 80's.
 
Mr Sparkle said:
dude, I laughed because he said I DIDN'T watch the shows. and believe me, I did, I even watched that "movie" they did in england and thought it was the greatest thing since sliced bread, I'm sure If I told you you have never watched the simpsons you'd be just as ready to laugh.



:mad::mad::mad::mad:

oh relax. i'm just poking a little fun at you. lighten up. i know you've got a good sense of humor, i thought you'd find that funny. sheesh.
 
Lackey said:
you forgot about poor little Andrew Keaton and Chrissy Seaver...not to mention Luke. Everybody always overlooks the jump-the-shark add-ons :(

chrissy seaver is one of the most annoying characters/actors in the history of situational comedies. i lothed her with a passion. still do.
 
sinewave said:
just because they had a few identical episodes doesn't mean one ripped off the other in terms of actual family structure, characters and series outline. many shows have completely ripped off episode plots throughout the history of sitcoms. how many times have we seen an episode of a show where one character watches another character's pet while they're away and the pet dies and they try and replace it with a similar looking animal to fool the owner? just becuase certain episodes share the same plot and some of the same jokes doesn't mean the creators of the series intentionally and blatantly ripped off another series. i'm actually siding with addendum on this issue. i think family ties and growing pains we're completely different series, aside from them focusing on families in the 80's.

Nooooooooo! I barely noticed that one :):up:
well, upon hours and hours of watching and liking BOTH shows i realized that one was a ripoff of the other. it didn't just "use the same formula".
it has happened in movies as well, and though there can be many differences in the movies, one is still ripping off the other, even IF they're both good.
 
sinewave said:
oh relax. i'm just poking a little fun at you. lighten up. i know you've got a good sense of humor, i thought you'd find that funny. sheesh.

three mad faces and you can't see I'm joking :down:(
 
Mr Sparkle said:
three mad faces and you can't see I'm joking :down:(

that's it, we're through! i want custody of our manservant raymundo during the week. you can have him on the weekends. there, that was easy.
 
sinewave said:
that's it, we're through! i want custody of our manservant raymundo during the week. you can have him on the weekends. there, that was easy.

raymundo serves only ME!:mad:
 
Early Simpsons was good, but when Phil Hartman passed away the quality of the show went down. The digital animation that is used now doesn't compare to the hand drawn stuff. Futurama is funny, good gags and animation. South Park is starting to return to what it used to be.

I have tried to watch Family Guy, but I don't get it.:confused:
 
FreeRadical said:
Early Simpsons was good, but when Phil Hartman passed away the quality of the show went down. The digital animation that is used now doesn't compare to the hand drawn stuff. Futurama is funny, good gags and animation. South Park is starting to return to what it used to be.

I have tried to watch Family Guy, but I don't get it.:confused:

join the club.
 
FreeRadical said:
Early Simpsons was good, but when Phil Hartman passed away the quality of the show went down. The digital animation that is used now doesn't compare to the hand drawn stuff. Futurama is funny, good gags and animation. South Park is starting to return to what it used to be.

I have tried to watch Family Guy, but I don't get it.:confused:

O RLY?
 
Mr Sparkle said:
well, the thing is , I don't even care that much, I'm just having a slow day at work:o, I don't understand how people get so defensive, the fact that it was ripoff doesn't mean it didn't have funny moments, I used to love family guy when IT FIRST aired, it WAS funny, but then it got LESS funny and eventually it got cancelled.

for some reason people can't deal with that fact, when it got cancelled it was because it wasn't funny anymore, and it's STILL not funny.

Actually I don't care either. You guys arguing reminded me of an episode of the Simpsons. :o
 
I used to watch the Simpsons like every day, as I started growing older I watched it less and less, it just wasn't as funny as it was before. I can honestly say on every Family Guy episode I have seen, the old ones and the new episodes, I have laughed my ass off. Its hard to watch the Simpsons now, its just not funny anymore, even the older ones aren't that funny now. Futurama I never really got into, South Park is funny at times.

The only thing I can't figure out is that if Family Guy isn't all that funny coming from all you experts on this board, why was it brought out of cancellation? Isn't it like the only animated or otherwise series to have done that? Oh and who gives a **** about Family Ties or Growing Pains? Thats goddamn right.
 
Mr Sparkle said:
well, the thing is , I don't even care that much, I'm just having a slow day at work:o, I don't understand how people get so defensive, the fact that it was ripoff doesn't mean it didn't have funny moments, I used to love family guy when IT FIRST aired, it WAS funny, but then it got LESS funny and eventually it got cancelled.

for some reason people can't deal with that fact, when it got cancelled it was because it wasn't funny anymore, and it's STILL not funny.

True. I don't think the writers of Family Guy can keep up the gags. Simpsons at least focuses on topical issues and mocks them, like South Park. The problem about Family Guy is that it's trying to tell a story out of the gags, and I can't identify with the characters or situations. :down
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,263
Messages
22,074,606
Members
45,875
Latest member
kedenlewis
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"