Bigfoot

[Quietstorm]

Theodore Roosevelt spoke about a Bigfoot encounter he had while hunting with friends, and he documented it in one of his diaries. Interesting huh.

 

[LastSunrise1981]

No I meant the confession. The infamous pictures about the Loch Ness were created by two men. They took a toy submarine attatched some sort of sculpting clay put it out into the water and took pictures of it. Thus creating the myth of the Loch Ness Monters. One of them died in the mid 80's or 90's and the other died a few years back. Before he did he confessed that he and his friend had hoaxed the loch ness monters.

I was refering to those two men that hoaxed that crypto animal, was that the one you were referring to?

As far as I know, Bigfoot hasn't been proven to be a hoax. Granted some are hoaxes and wildly laughable, but those don't discount thousands of other reports that have been given from others.

Lochness? The famous picture you're talking about has been proven to be a hoax and if I'm not mistaken, the man who admitted to the hoax passed away.

Seriously though, who's to say that there's nothing DEEP into the ocean? I'm not looking to find out though.

 

[Wilhelm-Scream]

Their hoaxing has nothing to do with whether or not there are really creatures.

Did you see on the news recently, like, last week or the week before, on all the major news networks, the video of a long serpenty thing in Lake Champlain?
http://www.abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=1648662

 

[BAH HUMBBUG!]

As far as I know, Bigfoot hasn't been proven to be a hoax. Granted some are hoaxes and wildly laughable, but those don't discount thousands of other reports that have been given from others.

Lochness? The famous picture you're talking about has been proven to be a hoax and if I'm not mistaken, the man who admitted to the hoax passed away.

Seriously though, who's to say that there's nothing DEEP into the ocean? I'm not looking to find out though.

Agreed, which is why I posted the qestions I did. To be perfectly honest, I am more open to believing in Bigfoot than I am the Loch Ness monster. A living dinasour? Come one.

Now as you said though, something else in the depths of the ocean is not unlikely at all.

And I agree with the hundreds or thousands of eye witnesses, of course many are just tricks on the eye. But as I said in an earlier post, who knows what's really out there. I mean just for example until 100-150 years ago. Western culture/scientits did not believe in;

The Giant Panda, The Mountain Gorilla and others. As well as a fish they thought extinct for 10,000 years but is still alive today. So who knows what roams this vast planet still undiscovered.

 

[BAH HUMBBUG!]

Their hoaxing has nothing to do with whether or not there are really creatures.

Did you see on the news recently, like, last week or the week before, on all the major news networks, the video of a long serpenty thing in Lake Champlain?
http://www.abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=1648662

I haven't seen that video before but I have seen others on "Champ", and I am more likely to believe champ than the LNM.

 

[Wilhelm-Scream]

Ah, it was Robert Heironimus. He said he was the guy in the suit in the Patterson film.
However, he apparently wrote a book called "The Making of Big Foot", so it could be argued that his word can't be trusted as he has something to gain and Patterson is dead.
http://www.katu.com/news/story.asp?ID=66988

 

[LastSunrise1981]

Agreed, which is why I posted the qestions I did. To be perfectly honest, I am more open to believing in Bigfoot than I am the Loch Ness monster. A living dinasour? Come one.

Now as you said though, something else in the depths of the ocean is not unlikely at all.

And I agree with the hundreds or thousands of eye witnesses, of course many are just tricks on the eye. But as I said in an earlier post, who knows what's really out there. I mean just for example until 100-150 years ago. Western culture/scientits did not believe in;

The Giant Panda, The Mountain Gorilla and others. As well as a fish they thought extinct for 10,000 years but is still alive today. So who knows what roams this vast planet still undiscovered.

Speaking of which, if you go to Youtube.com you can find some interesting Bigfoot videos. Some are scary, some are unique, and there's one that is so fake that it's obvious and some loser tried to post it as it being real.

Think of it this way, he was about as to close Bigfoot as you are to your computer screen now. The picture is all shakey, then when he zooms in to get a better look all of a sudden the picture goes bad.

Trust me, watch it, it's pretty damn hilarious.

There is one story about a man who apparently was face to face with Bigfoot. He said that he fired a shot to scare it away, and he continued with that the creature turned to look at him and walked away as if he wasn't there.

He describes Bigfoot later on as taking perfect human like strides, only like a giant man would on a track. He followed it and when the creature spotted him, it chased him through the forest and he said he couldn't figure out how it could've covered so much ground as quick as it did. I don't know if his story is true or not, but apparently from what he described, this thing could be a lot faster than a bear and bear is capable of running at 50 km/h (30mph).

It went on to describe that it was more like a demostration run than a chase, mainly stating that Bigfoot was letting him know that the forest was his domain.


http://youtube.com/watch?v=8fQGAykZe2s

Here's the link to that story I just told you about.

 

[BAH HUMBBUG!]

Ah, it was Robert Heironimus. He said he was the guy in the suit in the Patterson film.
However, he apparently wrote a book called "The Making of Big Foot", so it could be argued that his word can't be trusted as he has something to gain and Patterson is dead.
http://www.katu.com/news/story.asp?ID=66988

Ahh okay, I thought you meant it was Patterson, the guy that filmed it is the one that confessed. Here is the only problem, research has been done on the film and "supossedly" you can see muscle moving the "fur" and the contortion of the body and it's steps/movements conclude to it being non human.

But I guess we will wait and see.

 

[Wilhelm-Scream]

That's what I do when skate punks start skating out front of my work. I Run impossibly fast in circles to demonstrate that the pavement is my domain.

 

[BAH HUMBBUG!]

Speaking of which, if you go to Youtube.com you can find some interesting Bigfoot videos. Some are scary, some are unique, and there's one that is so fake that it's obvious and some loser tried to post it as it being real.

Think of it this way, he was about as to close Bigfoot as you are to your computer screen now. The picture is all shakey, then when he zooms in to get a better look all of a sudden the picture goes bad.

Trust me, watch it, it's pretty damn hilarious.

There is one story about a man who apparently was face to face with Bigfoot. He said that he fired a shot to scare it away, and he continued with that the creature turned to look at him and walked away as if he wasn't there.

He describes Bigfoot later on as taking perfect human like strides, only like a giant man would on a track. He followed it and when the creature spotted him, it chased him through the forest and he said he couldn't figure out how it could've covered so much ground as quick as it did. I don't know if his story is true or not, but apparently from what he described, this thing could be a lot faster than a bear and bear is capable of running at 50 km/h (30mph).

It went on to describe that it was more like a demostration run than a chase, mainly stating that Bigfoot was letting him know that the forest was his domain.


http://youtube.com/watch?v=8fQGAykZe2s

Here's the link to that story I just told you about.

What's interesting too is that scientist often dismiss the local indeginous people that live in these ares, whether it is the Native Americans from here or the Himalayas, China, South America or where ever. Yet the same indiginous people knew about the Mountain Gorilla and Giant Panda long before Western Science did.

 

[Wilhelm-Scream]

Ahh okay, I thought you meant it was Patterson, the guy that filmed it is the one that confessed. Here is the only problem, research has been done on the film and "supossedly" you can see muscle moving the "fur" and the contortion of the body and it's steps/movements conclude to it being non human.

But I guess we will wait and see.

This guy is a Bigfoot believer I'm assuming (http://www.angelfire.com/biz/bigfootcentral/ ) but says there's evidence of having shot twice. *shrug*

THE PATTERSON BIGFOOT FILM (What they never told you)

Who was in the fur suit may long remain a secret to many, yet only one obvious answer remains why the fur clad star in Patterson's film enters two opposite ends of the timberline in act one of the hot retreat. What most viewers of this, world's most overly ran on tv, film have missed is the two separate timberline entries. This all important to the validity of the film observation, fully determines the worth of the film. A first entry into the timberline can be seen taking place to the far left, while entry number two can be observed just seconds later at the timberline's far right. This dead give-away flaw supposedly captured by the photographer's own camera, clearly reveals that two different walk-aways by the film's furry star were made, ultimately showing that the film was shot twice, and clearly exposing itself as a bogus Bigfoot film. From: The Double Creature Feature Facts Article in Bigfoot Trails Newsletter. (c)Cliff Crook Bigfoot Central

At best seen in slow motion or frame by frame speed, the hard work of the truth slayers can't hide the captured on camera proof that the film was shot twice. As clearly the proof signs of prankery can be seen by all, the bfro camp and other die hard diciples of the Patterson film cult are still promoting the film as authentic Bigfoot evidence on their websites. The test of time bares many answers. The 1967 Bluff Creek Film is Bigfoot Hoax History & laid to rest in the Bigfoot file as the BIGFOOT HOAX OF THE CENTURY.​

​

 

[BAH HUMBBUG!]

Interesting

 

[LastSunrise1981]

This guy is a Bigfoot believer I'm assuming (http://www.angelfire.com/biz/bigfootcentral/ ) but says there's evidence of having shot twice. *shrug*


[/CENTER]

I'm not an expert on film or how to do camera tricks, but the film is very shakey and seems to clear up to get a better look at the creature.

I don't know though, but I believe that what they saw was a very real creature. If it's a hoax and is proven to be a hoax, then I'd be very disappointed in them for creating a big lie.

 

[TheWaterologist]

Ah, it was Robert Heironimus. He said he was the guy in the suit in the Patterson film.
However, he apparently wrote a book called "The Making of Big Foot", so it could be argued that his word can't be trusted as he has something to gain and Patterson is dead.
http://www.katu.com/news/story.asp?ID=66988

Actually, a respected investigative journalist wrote that book and convinced Heironimus ot come forward. It's a great read, and it convinced me that the video is fake.

 

[Wilhelm-Scream]

Actually, a respected investigative journalist wrote that book and convinced Heironimus ot come forward. It's a great read, and it convinced me that the video is fake.

Ah, I was just going off of

he stands to make some money now because he tells his story in a book that was just released called, "The making of Bigfoot."

and made an ass of U and Me.

 

[BAH HUMBBUG!]

Speaking of which, if you go to Youtube.com you can find some interesting Bigfoot videos. Some are scary, some are unique, and there's one that is so fake that it's obvious and some loser tried to post it as it being real.

Think of it this way, he was about as to close Bigfoot as you are to your computer screen now. The picture is all shakey, then when he zooms in to get a better look all of a sudden the picture goes bad.

Trust me, watch it, it's pretty damn hilarious.

There is one story about a man who apparently was face to face with Bigfoot. He said that he fired a shot to scare it away, and he continued with that the creature turned to look at him and walked away as if he wasn't there.

He describes Bigfoot later on as taking perfect human like strides, only like a giant man would on a track. He followed it and when the creature spotted him, it chased him through the forest and he said he couldn't figure out how it could've covered so much ground as quick as it did. I don't know if his story is true or not, but apparently from what he described, this thing could be a lot faster than a bear and bear is capable of running at 50 km/h (30mph).

It went on to describe that it was more like a demostration run than a chase, mainly stating that Bigfoot was letting him know that the forest was his domain.


http://youtube.com/watch?v=8fQGAykZe2s

Here's the link to that story I just told you about.

Just watched the video, and I would have **** my pants

 

[TheWaterologist]

Ah, I was just going off of and made an ass of U and Me.

I can't find who posted that

 

[Wilhelm-Scream]

I can't find who posted that

'cause it was from a news story.
http://www.katu.com/news/story.asp?ID=66988
But I'm not gonna count how many freaking paragraphs down for you.

 

[TheWaterologist]

This isn't right. I made this thread, I should be the one running circles around you

 

[Wilhelm-Scream]

First came the Horse Drawn Carriage, and it was GOOD.
But soon you've gotta make way for the HorseLESS Carriage.

 

[TheWaterologist]

Screw that tripe, I'm better now than I ever was I'd say I was peaking right now, if trends didn't indicate that I'll onyl be better come the future.

 

[Wilhelm-Scream]

Then you're saying that you'll soon be a Segway.

 

[TheWaterologist]

You know, maybe I need more pop culture references. That's one of the things I've never done, and it's been proven time and time again that these buffoons just go crazy when you mention Manos, or terrell owens, or just directly steal any quote used on the simpsons or family guy.

 

[Wilhelm-Scream]

I don't think we're in KANsas anymore.

 

[TheWaterologist]

Why do you keep doing that? are you sending me a secret message? I dont' understand, state it much more explicitely.