I Agree. A predominantly black action movie of any kind is a rare animal. Hell outside of Blaxploitation I can't think of any black action heroes who have headlined successful franchises.
I believe that a black superhero movie done right can be successful. However, the overall sentiment on this thread is that such a movie should have racism/civil rights aspects removed from the story.
I think that, with, T'Challa specifically there is an opportunity to create a symbol to which African-Americans can relate that Cap and Thor fail represent. Having a black superhero that doesn't address racial inequality, I think, will automatically invalidate that individual in the eyes of many people. You might argue that race should not be an issue but it IS at the very heart of a great many injustices. Isn't that exactly the type of things our heroes should be standing against?
When BP debuted in 1966 it was in direct response to the growing Black Power/Civil Rights movement. It was a bold move by Marvel but ultimately a missed opportunity as Marvel chose to take a "colorblind" approach to civil rights. Admirable, but a cop-out when you consider they were using a black superhero specifically to capitalize on a societal shift driven by blacks. Handled correctly BP could have represented the very positive aspects of the civil rights movement while standing in opposition of the violence that accompanied it. But the opportunity was missed and I don't believe black America ever fully embraced the Panther as a heroic representation of their ideals.
Adapting BP's origin to film and addressing these issues head on with very little sugarcoating could make this story relevant and resonant.
Now I am not suggesting that BP should spend his entire movie beating on whitey. I am suggesting that the issue of race be handled in a mature fashion by a ruler of an enlightened African nation.
I agree with a lot of what you said. I don't think colorblindness or deracialization works. Race remains an elephant in the room, so why run away from it? Why this rush to make Panther a generic superhero, robbing him of his unique history and background on the hopes that it will make white theater goers feel more comfortable? And that is a might.
Whether we like it or not, race will play a role throughout a BP film from the writing, casting, marketing, and eventually the box office, so why not realize that and deal with it? I don't think a BP movie needs to dwell on race, but I don't want one that acts like race doesn't exist either. I think in the comics Priest and Hudlin found ways to address race without making or acknowledging racial greviances against whites (because that is what I think people really mean when they say stuff like 'injecting race') the central aspect of each story.
The creation of Ross was an acknowledgement of how Panther's race might affect his sales so Priest threw a white guy in there that white fanboys might be able to relate to, and Priest did some occassional racial humor to make them feel at ease,though the humor wasn't at too much at the expense of BP, because ultimately Ross highlighted how badass Panther was. My fear is that in a move, the Ross character or another white equivalent will become the main character or the hero like Bateman did in Hancock.