Bone claws!?

Weadazoid said:
Besides as Stryker said

You were always an animal Wolverine... I just gave you Claws

Thats the way I liked in the comics.... the whole Wolverine losing is adamantium..sucked IMO


sag002 said:
keep the metal. bone claws suck

chaseter said:
Bone claws are dumb...

AMEN!

Bones claws are just an absolute abomination that I choose to completely ignore. People that want to see bone claws probably want to see a Ben Reilly clone in Spider-Man 3 and want the Iron Man movie to be based on the teenage Tony Stark Crossroads crap.

Bone claws never made any sense and curse the writer who thought of that stupidity.
 
Dude look at this pic

x-men2-wolverine-poster.jpg


Bones could fit in that whether u like it or not
 
Ok there YJ1, but bone claws are apart of wolverine. They are who he is, more then the adamantium. He has always had the bone claws, he was given metal to coat it later. So if your gonna just ignore the entire back story of Wolverine, I guesse your not a fan of him, then I begin to wonder why you are even in the Wolverine Movie Section of this forum :mad: Honestly man, the bones are moreapart of him then the metal. He is the bone, the metal is a gift ;)
 
i like the idea of bone claws. its part of his mutation. i like the idea of him at least having a few scenes with them. its good homage to the comics.
 
Abaddon said:
I thought in the second film Stryker mentioned him being a mutant they found with a healing factor and bone claws?:confused:

i think he did :confused:
 
i think people are taking the line "i just gave you claws" a bit too literally.
 
LoGaN's RuNNer said:
^Exactly.^
dam right...



and its not like the bone claws are in the WHOLE movie... just the first like what 30min?
 
xwolverine2 said:
i think people are taking the line "i just gave you claws" a bit too literally.

i think strkyer meant by claws as just the adamantuim
 
I really think it makes sense to have the Bone Claws....just because it seems pretty unlikely that Wolverine would be able to get claws as a side effect of the bonding process, and he just happens to be able to retract them?

I mean if the claws were a side effect of the process, how would Wolverine be able to retract them into his hands? He heals fast yeah, but his hands don't create whole new muscles.
 
I say have them just to show non-comic fans that he had them before his experiment in Weapon X.
 
Bone claws that were part of his skeleton would explain why the adamantium formed itself into claws. Otherwise, why would it turn itself into claws inside his arms unless it was following a physical form (existing bone claws) or (if the claws had been crushed) a genetic template for claws within the DNA of his bones....

It makes sense.
 
ISHMAEL said:
i think strkyer meant by claws as just the adamantuim

I think since we know Bryan Singer was against the bone claws idea, that he was setting the record straight to the general audience that claws are not part of his mutant power...as if we needed it explained anymore.
 
TheVileOne said:
I personally always thought it was stupid that Wolverine had bone claws. It makes more sense to me that he got them from Weapon X.

I agree.

The_Guyver said:
If he doesn't have bone claws, his lone power is his healing factor... I think bone claws are essential.

Well, before they decided he had bone claws he was still the same character most comics fans love...
 
I wonder if some of the idiots on here are going to start telling me that LADY DEATHSTRYKE'S claws are bone as well.

Bone claws = dumb brain fart.

I was happy at first, because I was hoping the movies did away with the bone claws crap.

Also, by the shape the claws are in the movie, they CAN'T be bone. Unless they give Wolverine thin flat sided bone claws, which they weren't in the comics.

Freaking comic writers and their bone claws.
 
they CAN be bone, the pic above blatenly shows they CAN be done accept it, and the claws are already different from the comics so why wuld differnt bone claws make a difference
 
jim_root_rules said:
they CAN be bone, the pic above blatenly shows they CAN be done accept it, and the claws are already different from the comics so why wuld differnt bone claws make a difference
Because the claws aren't that shape in the movie.
 
TheVileOne said:
I wonder if some of the idiots on here are going to start telling me that LADY DEATHSTRYKE'S claws are bone as well.

Bone claws = dumb brain fart.

I was happy at first, because I was hoping the movies did away with the bone claws crap.

Also, by the shape the claws are in the movie, they CAN'T be bone. Unless they give Wolverine thin flat sided bone claws, which they weren't in the comics.

Freaking comic writers and their bone claws.
I love bone claws and it possible and makes sense. Maybe when Stryker got them he adjusted the bone claws :confused:...and made them thinner like we see in the movies...then coated it with ademantium
 
Sentinel X said:
I love bone claws and it possible and makes sense. Maybe when Stryker got them he adjusted the bone claws :confused:...and made them thinner like we see in the movies...then coated it with ademantium

This is a dumb excuse and I've already debunked it. Since wolverine has a healing factor, Stryker can NOT ****ing change the shape of his bone claws!

Good freaking God.
 
TheVileOne said:
This is a dumb excuse and I've already debunked it. Since wolverine has a healing factor, Stryker can NOT ****ing change the shape of his bone claws!

Good freaking God.

the know it all has spoken and is forever close minded...I think sometimes I enjoy hearing you debunk other peoples ideas and opinions but most of the time you just come across as well...you know what you are its okay to be like that on these boards...we're all faceless, but there is never any reason to be like that...bone claws can work, maybe not like that, but if they try they will write and change anything they want and being a jerk is not going to change what the filmmakers will eventually decide on. Whatever makes you happy.
 
TheVileOne said:
This is a dumb excuse and I've already debunked it. Since wolverine has a healing factor, Stryker can NOT ****ing change the shape of his bone claws!

Good freaking God.
100% AGREED:up: Stryker cannot change the physical aspects of his claws because they would heal the second Stryker started grinding on them. And I can guarantee all of you bone lovers in here that Fox will not give Wolverine knife shaped bone claws in the movie. That resembles his adamntium claws way to closely...The Latino review also contradicts itself. Sabretooth cannot break off Logan's bone claws permanently because they would immediately grow back...
 
Some of you really need to check up on your comic facts.

All of you who complain that the bone claws are stupid because they are too fragile to be used as weapons are flat out wrong. Yes the claws have been broken, but in Wolverine's bio that Marvel used to insert on the first page of the comics it clearly states that Wolverine's claws are made of "super dense bone" which means that they are much, much stronger than normal human bones. The bones are super dense because Wolverine's healing factor makes his bones much stronger than a normal person, the same way it makes him much faster and stronger than humans.

If any of you read a Wolverine bio you would know that Marvel has stated that Wolverine's bone claws are naturally sharp and durable enough to cut through most natural substances, including rocks, trees, and most kinds of metal like solid steel.

Now for those of you in the "Stryker can't alter the shape of Wolverine's bones" Camp, you are wrong too. Every time Wolverine's bone claws were shattered or broken in the comics it would take several (days to weeks) issues for the claws to regrow to their natural length. In staying consistant with the comics then, it would be completely resonable for Stryker to shave down the claws to the Adamantium shape.

Movie Wolverine does not heal as fast as Comic Wolverine, therefor Stryker should have more than enough time to prepare the claws for the bonding process.
 
That's when the claws are snapped, off. You are talking about wittling them down to thin them.

Which Stryker wouldn't even fricking do. This is just grasping at straws.

And second, since he has a healing factor they couldn't stay that way permanently.

I can't believe we are actually arguing about this but we are.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,288
Messages
22,080,372
Members
45,880
Latest member
Heartbeat
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"