BOUGHT/THOUGHT May 30

Count me in on that. I'm really, heavy stress on really, enjoying Dynamo 5. It's really fun. Every character is getting fleshed out and the art is kicking. I just got #3 this week, and it was the first book I read. The only compliant I have is the price at $3.50, but if it continues to give solid reads with every issue, then I don't mind.

If the price tag is 3.50 for you guys south of the border,I don't even want to guess the price for us.It looks like an interesting book,but might just wait for the trade.

I'll only be willing to pay that price for Ellis' upcoming Doktor Sleepless and Black Summer.:woot:
 
simple sweaty vagina is a bad thing unto itself. Under normal conditions the smell eminating from a vagina is not wholly unpleasent , but not exactly ideal. Mix in sweat and it goes from smelling like slightly ripe tuna to decomposing fish heads. :down:

Vagina scent is very pleasant... :up:

You're just eating out pig-chicks...

:yay:
 
Few More Thoughts:

The Plain Janes: I'm a bit mixed on this book, mainly because a reader can do a comparison in style to Spider-Man Loves Mary Jane. While readers will realize that SLMJ doesn't really tackle issues that current teens might face, it really doesn't distract from the story very much. After all, most of us remember the innocence of reading Spidey's adventures and to have Mary Jane facing such issues as drugs, teen pregnacy, or school shootings would just feel out of place. To have the title be as innocent to only show kissing as the farthest a gal goes feels true to our feelings for the characters.

With Plain Janes, we are instantly brought into today's world, though. The main character, Jane, is simply walking down a street as she passes a local eatery with a garbage can by the building. In an instant, a bomb placed in that garbage can explodes, sending her reeling. Laying next to her in the body of a boy, who we'd soon learn ends up in a coma. As a reaction to the threat of terrorism, her family flees to the safety of the suburbs. Jane, meanwhile, flees her old life, and changes her appearance (cuts hair, dyes it black) to appear as an outcast among most of those she finds annoying at her new school. She goes in search of a group of like-minded misfits...only they don't really seem to like or accept her. Stubborn as she is, though, she continues to hang out with them, trying to discover a way for them all to bond. (BTW, the three gals in this group are named Jane, Jayne, and Polly Jane.) Later, in an attempt to bond them all, our main character decides to be an artistic terrorist to the town she now lives in, and with her three reluctant friends, they do artistic terrorism in the name of P.L.A.I.N.

The concept is actually pretty good; it's just the little touches in between that are suppose to make the reader get in touch with the teen in the kids that ring false. A boy crush is developed by the main character, but it's all very innocent. Every one is a stereotype, and the supposed intelligent main character is one too. I believe the book is about breaking through those stereotypes; it just fails. The characters aren't really likeable, the main Jane comes across as a bit of a dimbulb, and the ending is possibly one of the least satisfying ones I've read. There are some cute moments and some nice dialogue that will get a chuckle from the reader; but, the sentimental moments fall flat. I never really felt the main character's plight. Even when one of the other Janes discover her past and tries to reach out, it just seems to go against the characterization previously presented and is never brought up again.

This is a quick read. It almost feels like it could have been longer, that some of the characters could have been more developed, and that the ending was quickly brought on in an attempt to wrap everything up. (The problem is that the ending doesn't wrap up anything at all, and only leaves the reader thinking, "What about .....?" Too many questions remain unanswered.) I applaud the writer for trying to bring out some concepts that young readers probably won't catch when reading it. For example, as I mentioned Jane's perception of her parents trying to escape is exactly what she's doing when changing her appearance and social life; that just because you believe you've left your problems behind, that they actually still linger with you (this is badly done, because the book doesn't actually show anyone confronting their problems); or, that Jane's supposed caring for others is still really centered on herself. It's a nobel first effort from Cecil Castellucci, though. 7/10

Ultimate Fantastic Four: The writer of this book is really making some very good stories, much better than the "New" Fantastic Four. Reed's continued quest to make the Ultimate's version of the Cosmic Cube continues, this time bringing about a much better version of the Silver Surfer than what we previously saw in the minis featuring Ultimate Galactus. (It will be interesting if that serie's version will in any way be mentioned or acknowledged.) The writer has started to develop some great stories within the story, all leading to future events. (The Cosmic Cube has been going on since the writer's first storyarc involving Ultimate Thanos.) Plus, we are seeing some interesting supporting characters being developed. My only problem with this issue is one of my pet peeves: Giving away an ending with the cover of your issue. The revelation that the entity that Reed has brought to our world is the Silver Surfer isn't revealed until the final page; but, it's no secret to the reader. After all, the story is called "The Silver Surfer," and the cover shows him, too. (This same thing happened recently with Moon Knight. The cover showed The Punisher, who didn't appear until the very last page of that book.) 9/10

Daredevil #97: It's funny that the title Bendis was best on is the one he drops. And, that his replacement ends up being just as good, if not a bit better. Why better? Because Brubaker seems to realize that element that made Daredevil so special in the past: Hell's Kitchen and the characters within it. Bendis got so stuck on his big plot recently of unmasking DD that the focus changed. Now, we are seeing some of our old favorites, like Turk and Gladiator, return to these pages. Daredevil was never about the flashy villians; it was about Matt Murdock and his quest to make Hell's Kitchen safe for its inhabitants. It's also about the gritty feel of the environment. Brubaker has a feel for all his characters, whether hero or villian. I only hope he doesn't choose to kill off Matt's wife. She has fit in extremely well with the stories and has been much more interesting of a character than the more popular Mary Jane Watson-Parker in the Spidey titles. Bendis was a fool to give up this title; and the reader is now benefiting more because of it. The only thing that would suck is if Brubaker left, Bendis came back, and reconned everything that we've been currently reading. 10/10

New Excalibur #20: This title is improving issue after issue, and this story involving Albion has actually got me interested in it again. It's not the best X-title...but, it's hands down better than X-Men. The problem is it suffers from the same problem as X-Men: The grouping of characters just aren't that interesting. Juggernaut, no matter how you write him, isn't a very interesting good guy; they've reduced him into a bore. Captain Britain and Pete Wisdom have always been just that, too. Dazzler is extremely un-Dazzlerish. Sage has potential; but, has never lived up to her potential. The only character really interesting is Kurt's alternate-reality daughter, Nocturne. So, like I said, the title is getting better; but, it's still not great. 7/10


(BTW, I have to give props to those who fixed the lags with The Hype. I haven't had a single problem logging on or posting anything for the entire week. Thank You BIGTIME for those involved with making it better. The difference is very noticable.)
 
Which of his books are overrated?

USM, IMO, was overrated for some time even before Clone Saga. NEW AVENGERS was overrated before CW started and sometimes now still is. MIGHTY AVENGERS is quite often confused with, say, DYNAMO 5 in the "big dumb action" dept. My point is, I can think of about a half dozen titles that deserve to sell as well or better as some of his books. He's an A-List though, so everything he writes is overrated, even before it is published. I mean, it explains why he hasn't improved as a writer since, and why he is fairly arrogant. If any of us got praise for everything we do or don't do before we do it, would we work extra hard? No. People don't work like that. In that way you can't blame him for being human. Now, if his editors weren't all gushing, thankful yes-men...

Girls is on my list. I'm hunting down all the back issues, and currently I'm on #11. Great book. The dialogue is what really stands out. The characters all feel like real individuals, and as I read their words, it just has a realness to it. I expected it to be a good read, but so far I've been very pleasently surprised.

Dynamo 5 is new. When it comes out I review it, tight here on the Hype. Dread does the same. Other than us two (or three, including yourself), I don't know if anyone else on here is picking it up. My guess is, it'll go the Invincible route and pick up new readers very slowly. With these types of books, it usually takes the first 6-10 issues for the title to really hit it's stride. However, in my last review of the book, I commented how I thought it may have hit that mark with issue #3. I don't know what else to say....If you're not picking it up, you're really missing out on the start of a great book.

Count me in on that. I'm really, heavy stress on really, enjoying Dynamo 5. It's really fun. Every character is getting fleshed out and the art is kicking. I just got #3 this week, and it was the first book I read. The only compliant I have is the price at $3.50, but if it continues to give solid reads with every issue, then I don't mind.

If the price tag is 3.50 for you guys south of the border,I don't even want to guess the price for us.It looks like an interesting book,but might just wait for the trade.

I'll only be willing to pay that price for Ellis' upcoming Doktor Sleepless and Black Summer.:woot:

I assume DYNAMO 5 is $3.50 because it has somewhere between 20-26 pages of story with zero ads within. People have said that without ads, the price of comics would be higher, so I guess $3.50 for 20 pages (the last two issues have been about that many, naturally, issue #1 was 26 pages so it evens out I guess) for zero ads is the going rate. I enjoy the heck out of it, though, no matter the price.
 
USM, IMO, was overrated for some time even before Clone Saga. NEW AVENGERS was overrated before CW started and sometimes now still is. MIGHTY AVENGERS is quite often confused with, say, DYNAMO 5 in the "big dumb action" dept. My point is, I can think of about a half dozen titles that deserve to sell as well or better as some of his books. He's an A-List though, so everything he writes is overrated, even before it is published. I mean, it explains why he hasn't improved as a writer since, and why he is fairly arrogant. If any of us got praise for everything we do or don't do before we do it, would we work extra hard? No. People don't work like that. In that way you can't blame him for being human. Now, if his editors weren't all gushing, thankful yes-men...

Fair enough. Though, I'd love to see these posts where Mighty Avengers is being compared to Dynamo 5.
 
Fair enough. Though, I'd love to see these posts where Mighty Avengers is being compared to Dynamo 5.

What I meant was MIGHTY AVENGERS is usually considered to be "off limits" from criticism because it's being "fun superhero fluff" like DYNAMO 5 is most of the time. No, no literal comparisons were made. But it was on my mind because we were discussing it.

Frankly, MA would seem less awkward to me if the characters in any way tried to appease their sins from CW. Iron Man I don't mind, because Bendis plays him dead-straight as a relentless *****e. But everyone else, well, they're gleefully willing to jolly stomp their friends and allies in NA and yet here we are supposed to root for them. Like, imagine if in ASM, we saw the brutal Sinister Six stomping Spidey and threatening his friends and allies, and then in, say, a mini, see that same Six being protrayed as loveable heroes fighting monsters. The two, selling side by side, would gell awkwardly. That, in a nutshell, is mostly why I cut MA little slack. Ironically, as I noted, ILLUMINATI probably does the most harm to continuity, yet I cut it more slack.
 
What I meant was MIGHTY AVENGERS is usually considered to be "off limits" from criticism because it's being "fun superhero fluff" like DYNAMO 5 is most of the time. No, no literal comparisons were made. But it was on my mind because we were discussing it.

Frankly, MA would seem less awkward to me if the characters in any way tried to appease their sins from CW. Iron Man I don't mind, because Bendis plays him dead-straight as a relentless *****e. But everyone else, well, they're gleefully willing to jolly stomp their friends and allies in NA and yet here we are supposed to root for them. Like, imagine if in ASM, we saw the brutal Sinister Six stomping Spidey and threatening his friends and allies, and then in, say, a mini, see that same Six being protrayed as loveable heroes fighting monsters. The two, selling side by side, would gell awkwardly. That, in a nutshell, is mostly why I cut MA little slack. Ironically, as I noted, ILLUMINATI probably does the most harm to continuity, yet I cut it more slack.

But the Sinister Six are villains, and that's pretty much the whole premise behind Thunderbolts now. That analogy makes little sense to me.

Mighty Avengers is just fun classic superhero stuff. Bendis relegates all the "jolly stomping" to NA, which is going to have a different perspective naturally. It meshes well, because it's a nice contrast. NA features heroes in hiding on the run that see the Mighty Avengers as fascist *****ebags and as the enemy. While Mighty Avengers is busy saving the world from Ultron.

Let's also remember, that there are fans of the Pro-Reg side, even through all of CW. A minority yes, but a 70/30 fanbase according to most polls I've seen.
 
But the Sinister Six are villains, and that's pretty much the whole premise behind Thunderbolts now. That analogy makes little sense to me.

Mighty Avengers is just fun classic superhero stuff. Bendis relegates all the "jolly stomping" to NA, which is going to have a different perspective naturally. It meshes well, because it's a nice contrast. NA features heroes in hiding on the run that see the Mighty Avengers as fascist *****ebags and as the enemy. While Mighty Avengers is busy saving the world from Ultron.

Let's also remember, that there are fans of the Pro-Reg side, even through all of CW. A minority yes, but a 70/30 fanbase according to most polls I've seen.

But, then you have the characters in MA not acting appropriately because of the "premise". Shouldn't they all care about Cap's death? Shouldn't others besides Ms. Marvel feel conflicted? I mean, Wonder Man was gung-ho in her book, but written as very conflicted in FRONTLINE.

Marvel seriously overplayed their hand with the Pro-Reg side. Had they not been so overzealous to throw the audience, and been more willing to not have Jenkins, JMS and Millar overdo things, it would have worked out much better. But, it didn't work out that way, and they can't just pretend it didn't happen. Without character depth and drama, it feels empty. Not NEXTWAVE empty but still empty. It's not just perspective; the Mighty Avengers used Cap's death, a man they should all care about, to lure old friends into a trap and the only one who cared was Ms. Marvel, but she did it anyway, making her guilt useless. Really the only way it works is if one reads one and not the other.

Actually, it is a shame that the CW stuff works against MA, because without all that drama I could see it working as many say it does. But you can't shut that stuff off.
 
Actually, it is a shame that the CW stuff works against MA, because without all that drama I could see it working as many say it does. But you can't shut that stuff off.

Sure you can.:huh: I mean, if you're going to judge a book not for what it is, but all these other circumstances, it just seems like you're coming up with excuses to hate on it. There's a clear reason why Bendis hasn't touched upon any of the NA booby trap stuff or Cap's death, it's because he wants to keep it fun and light. Maybe I'm giving Bendis too much credit here but honestly, if you can't just see the book for what it is, then whats the point of reading it?
 
But, then you have the characters in MA not acting appropriately because of the "premise". Shouldn't they all care about Cap's death? Shouldn't others besides Ms. Marvel feel conflicted? I mean, Wonder Man was gung-ho in her book, but written as very conflicted in FRONTLINE.

Marvel seriously overplayed their hand with the Pro-Reg side. Had they not been so overzealous to throw the audience, and been more willing to not have Jenkins, JMS and Millar overdo things, it would have worked out much better. But, it didn't work out that way, and they can't just pretend it didn't happen. Without character depth and drama, it feels empty. Not NEXTWAVE empty but still empty. It's not just perspective; the Mighty Avengers used Cap's death, a man they should all care about, to lure old friends into a trap and the only one who cared was Ms. Marvel, but she did it anyway, making her guilt useless. Really the only way it works is if one reads one and not the other.

Actually, it is a shame that the CW stuff works against MA, because without all that drama I could see it working as many say it does. But you can't shut that stuff off.

I agree man, good post.
 
Sure you can.:huh: I mean, if you're going to judge a book not for what it is, but all these other circumstances, it just seems like you're coming up with excuses to hate on it. There's a clear reason why Bendis hasn't touched upon any of the NA booby trap stuff or Cap's death, it's because he wants to keep it fun and light. Maybe I'm giving Bendis too much credit here but honestly, if you can't just see the book for what it is, then whats the point of reading it?

It's a MU-616 book and they all are supposed to be in continuity. It just feels as if Bendis is ignoring it, even his own, because it is inconvient.

Eros said:
I agree man, good post.

Thanks. :word:
 
It's a MU-616 book and they all are supposed to be in continuity. It just feels as if Bendis is ignoring it, even his own, because it is inconvient.

That's one way to look at it. Simply put, both Avengers titles represent two sides and two different viewpoints.

New Avengers, anti-registration, on the run, work covertly

Mighty Avengers, pro-registration, loved by the public, the people's superhero team.

You may think it's Bendis ignoring continuity, even his own, and that may be the case, but he's doing so for a reason. Also, with the storyline going on, I don't see the point in having Carol stop everything in the middle of the battle with the new Ultron and say "Gee guys, that trap we set for the New Avengers was not cool" You never know Dread, he may touch upon it in the future.
 
That's one way to look at it. Simply put, both Avengers titles represent two sides and two different viewpoints.

New Avengers, anti-registration, on the run, work covertly

Mighty Avengers, pro-registration, loved by the public, the people's superhero team.

You may think it's Bendis ignoring continuity, even his own, and that may be the case, but he's doing so for a reason. Also, with the storyline going on, I don't see the point in having Carol stop everything in the middle of the battle with the new Ultron and say "Gee guys, that trap we set for the New Avengers was not cool" You never know Dread, he may touch upon it in the future.

Kind of like how he acknowledged why he got Jessica Drew's powers wrong in NA's launch about a year after the fact? That doesn't impress me. He also had tons of useless flashbacks in MA #2 and even some in #1, some of these issues could have been mentioned. But, no.
 
Kind of like how he acknowledged why he got Jessica Jones' powers wrong in NA's launch about a year after the fact? That doesn't impress me. He also had tons of useless flashbacks in MA #2 and even some in #1, some of these issues could have been mentioned. But, no.

Then stop reading the ****ing book Dread. Honestly, don't make the same mistake you made with USM, drop the ****ing book like a bad habit.:whatever:

And you mean Jessica Drew.
 
Then stop reading the ****ing book Dread. Honestly, don't make the same mistake you made with USM, drop the ****ing book like a bad habit.:whatever:

And you mean Jessica Drew.

But then if I dropped MA I couldn't talk about MA because then I would have posters like you going, "Ah, ya don't read the book, so shauppayoumout." Besides, they're primers for the MU. Anything important in the MU happens in MA or NA.

And yes, I did mean Drew. I will edit.
 
But then if I dropped MA I couldn't talk about MA because then I would have posters like you going, "Ah, ya don't read the book, so shauppayoumout." Besides, they're primers for the MU. Anything important in the MU happens in MA or NA.

And yes, I did mean Drew. I will edit.

Stop catching feelings Dread. But honestly, you seem to not enjoy the book, a lot. Why read it? And there's more than it's a primer for the MU, because you can easily catch up on what's going on through spoilers and reviews.
 
Stop catching feelings Dread. But honestly, you seem to not enjoy the book, a lot. Why read it? And there's more than it's a primer for the MU, because you can easily catch up on what's going on through spoilers and reviews.

It has promise. Despite all my misgivings it is a helluva lot better than NA #1-3 sure as hell was, and I stayed on that.

Just, it's a book that needs CW as the backdrop to justify it, but then ignores every single relevant detail so it can pull the ****** Micheal Bay popcorn schtick. I rarely turn my brain off on books and Bendis will, in all honesty, NEVER get that privalage. When you are the #1 writer in the biz, that is too much of a luxury. And he's made too many errors to forgive. Admittedly, I am the type of fan who can never be pleased enough to forgive a writer for some major bungle, especially when they keep making some (IMO, of course).

Besides, it's more fun chatting about the hot books. Comparing MA to USM just insults MA. In a way it is a victim of circumstances. USM was 100% in Bendy's control song and verse and just deevolved into toxic waste.
 
Transformers looks tight as hell yo. Don't hate.:o

The ratio of "TV shows to modern day movies" is about 7:1 in favor of suck. It is about 8:1 in favor of overdone mediocrity. Maybe TRANSFORMERS is one that bucks the trend. But I usually err on the side of logical probibility and realistic expectations.
 
The ratio of "TV shows to modern day movies" is about 7:1 in favor of suck. It is about 8:1 in favor of overdone mediocrity. Maybe TRANSFORMERS is one that bucks the trend. But I usually err on the side of logical probibility and realistic expectations.

Yeah that all sounds dandy and whatnot but you forgot to add Megan Fox in your calculations my dear Dread.:cmad::meow:
 
Yeah that all sounds dandy and whatnot but you forgot to add Megan Fox in your calculations my dear Dread.:cmad::meow:

See, that's whats wrong with Dread, he's all logic and facts. PWN3R and I, we're all heart.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"