Superman Returns Box office affecting sequel

Agentdemon said:
where did u see it?

There used to be a site that had early drafts for the 1st Spiderman movie before it was released.
Two were from David Koepp, and one was from James Cameron. Unfortunatly the site was removed due to unauthorized usage.
 
I think everyone's forgetting one thing here.

Digital downloads, and DVD's, forget about merchandise and tie-ins, there seperate, when it comes to really making money these two are it.

Why have family guy and Futurama come back after being cancelled, because of the success of the DVD sales showing there's an audience, because of this studio's are now thinking differentley about TV show's eventually things like sweeps won't matter because alot of shows will be made for DVD why have advertisers paying you, only by twisting your arm on what to show like cliffhangers and full on expensive action episodes when you can just give the audience the show they wanna watch and they can watch it when they want.

Same for Movies, this will be huge on DVD, Blu-Ray and HD DVD plus whatever digital downloads will be going on, maybe through I-Tunes once the new I-Pod comes out, so whatever it's doing now will be increased, giving more than enough for the sequel.
 
ChrisBaleBatman said:
Yeah, it's made $106 mil so far.

I laugh if this movie blows up next week.... people been on vacation and stuff and have family stuff going on,,,, i have a feeling this movie might just pick up.... actaully i bet this movie would have done better if released in Jan or Feb seeing how theres NOTHING GOING ON and people got nothing better to do then to go see a movie
 
Lightning54SC said:
I laugh if this movie blows up next week.... people been on vacation and stuff and have family stuff going on,,,, i have a feeling this movie might just pick up.... actaully i bet this movie would have done better if released in Jan or Feb seeing how theres NOTHING GOING ON and people got nothing better to do then to go see a movie

This is true, people are always on about how the 4th of july weekend is great for movies, maybe it was once, or maybe because of certain circumstances a few movies have been hits, but nothing has really been that HUGE, look at all may releases, everything action wise is huge, Spider-Man 1 and 2 both huge both released in may, X-Men 2 and 3 both released in may both great on the money X-3 more so.

Iron Man may just benefit from a may release, if you think about it, january and february are slow in terms of movies, may is when the summer blockbusters start and are the first people rush out to see.
 
Hour Man said:
I think everyone's forgetting one thing here.

Digital downloads, and DVD's, forget about merchandise and tie-ins, there seperate, when it comes to really making money these two are it.

Why have family guy and Futurama come back after being cancelled, because of the success of the DVD sales showing there's an audience, because of this studio's are now thinking differentley about TV show's eventually things like sweeps won't matter because alot of shows will be made for DVD why have advertisers paying you, only by twisting your arm on what to show like cliffhangers and full on expensive action episodes when you can just give the audience the show they wanna watch and they can watch it when they want.

Same for Movies, this will be huge on DVD, Blu-Ray and HD DVD plus whatever digital downloads will be going on, maybe through I-Tunes once the new I-Pod comes out, so whatever it's doing now will be increased, giving more than enough for the sequel.

ok then, explain how Hulk, which was critically acclaimed, made more than SR in it's first week, and had great DVD sales, hasnt gotten a sequel yet? :confused: The answer, it made money but not enough (and it had a smaller budget than SR), and 99 times out of 100 DVD sales will not save a bad movie's bottom line.
 
The Incredible Hulk said:
ok then, explain how Hulk, which was critically acclaimed, made more than SR in it's first week, and had great DVD sales, hasnt gotten a sequel yet? :confused: The answer, it made money but not enough (and it had a smaller budget than SR), and 99 times out of 100 DVD sales will not save a bad movie's bottom line.

if superman was sooooo bad then at least its still bove the HULK :p
 
This movie will not get a sequel unless something drastic happens in the next 2 days. After that the steamroller that is called POTC2 will squish this little film under its boot heel. I don't like it but that is a fact at this juncture. This film is under performing in a big way WB is sweating it. The only thing left is to see who gets the axe over a remake of a 30 year old movie nobody wanted. They should've started fresh and the problems this movie is staring at at the moment would've never happened.
 
WTFwuzThT said:
This movie will not get a sequel unless something drastic happens in the next 2 days. After that the steamroller that is called POTC2 will squish this little film under its boot heel. I don't like it but that is a fact at this juncture. This film is under performing in a big way WB is sweating it. The only thing left is to see who gets the axe over a remake of a 30 year old movie nobody wanted. They should've started fresh and the problems this movie is staring at at the moment would've never happened.

ahhhh POTC2 i think is way over rated and it wont be getting my $$$ till rental day
 
It probably is overrated, I won't disagree with that at all. However, it is a movie that will make money as people are actually looking forward to seeing it. I didn't particularly like the first one but as we can all see there is a lot of people that did and they WILL pay the money to see the sequel as opposed to plopping it down for a movie that is being heralded as under performing. Their choice will be POTC2 as this is not an unknown to them while SR is. Superman is dead in the water in 2 days. It's sad but it is in the end WB's own fault.
 
They'll make a sequel, it will just have a smaller budget.

But if the film doesn't hold up well next weekend, I wouldn't be surprised to see Singer replaced. After all, X3 still managed to clean up without him.

It's an interesting question though, since I doubt they'll want to go back to trying another reboot.
 
The Incredible Hulk said:
ok then, explain how Hulk, which was critically acclaimed, made more than SR in it's first week, and had great DVD sales, hasnt gotten a sequel yet? :confused: The answer, it made money but not enough (and it had a smaller budget than SR), and 99 times out of 100 DVD sales will not save a bad movie's bottom line.

Hulk managed to make more in its opening weekend, but failed miserably after that. About an $80 mill domestic opener and only went on to make another $50 mill domestically. Eek. The bad word of mouth just killed it. After opening weekend, people starting avoidong Hulk like the plague. DVD sales were good though because as time passes, people who skipped it get curious and want to check out the film.

Worldwide, Hulk did make some BO profit for the studio, but not much. DVD sales were successful, but not quite successful enough to call for a quick sequel. This is why the studio scrapped Ang Lee is making a totally new spin on the Hulk sequel that is STILL waiting to start production.
 
There will be a sequel(Im hoping) I mean arent they making another Hulk movie? and that thing bizombed.
 
ChrisBaleBatman said:
I dunno.....Post Crisis Superman is kinda an ass, isn't he?

BWAHAHAHAHHA!!!

sorry, i just had to quote that :p

*ahem* carry on....
 
PunisherPoster said:
They'll make a sequel, it will just have a smaller budget.

But if the film doesn't hold up well next weekend, I wouldn't be surprised to see Singer replaced. After all, X3 still managed to clean up without him.

It's an interesting question though, since I doubt they'll want to go back to trying another reboot.

Its also likely that they will drop any idea of following on from the donner films, as the financial reception for this one hasnt been anywhere near what they hoped for. so I think for that reason a reboot is most likely. which will probably mean all new cast as well. in which case i think you are looking at 5 years before any new one comes out
 
logansoldcigar said:
Its also likely that they will drop any idea of following on from the donner films, as the financial reception for this one hasnt been anywhere near what they hoped for. so I think for that reason a reboot is most likely. which will probably mean all new cast as well. in which case i think you are looking at 5 years before any new one comes out

You gotta be kidding. No Way. WB will look like a total idiot. Anyway the cast is not the problem.
 
yes, but IF they decide to reboot, they will look even more stupid by trying to keep the same cast.

remember, all they need to do is quietly wait for 4 or 5 years..(its not superman doesnt sell plenty of merchandise anway) and them employ a new director to handle the reboot. he has control of casting. he doesnt like routh. bye bye.
Im not sayiong he was/wasnt good in the role, I aint seen it. thats why i havent said I thought the movie was good or bad. but IF they decide to replace singer, then the first thing any new director may do is recast it. Might as well go the whole hog.
 
logansoldcigar said:
yes, but IF they decide to reboot, they will look even more stupid by trying to keep the same cast.

remember, all they need to do is quietly wait for 4 or 5 years..(its not superman doesnt sell plenty of merchandise anway) and them employ a new director to handle the reboot. he has control of casting. he doesnt like routh. bye bye.
Im not sayiong he was/wasnt good in the role, I aint seen it. thats why i havent said I thought the movie was good or bad. but IF they decide to replace singer, then the first thing any new director may do is recast it. Might as well go the whole hog.

Hmmm...that true. That's what they semi did with Batman.
 
Billy Batson said:
No it's not.
There will be a Brand New Superman Franchise starring: Tom Welling in seven years. The Screenplay which DOOMED SR, will be excellent in the new films.

lol, i literally gagged when i read this. thanks for the morning comedy, shazam. :) :up:
 
logansoldcigar said:
yes, but IF they decide to reboot, they will look even more stupid by trying to keep the same cast.....QUOTE]

There's almost no chance of a reboot.
 
I still am wondering why Singer, Routh etc havent mentioned the box office results, or given any interview or have heard from the WB that the sequel is a go. I remember Batman reviews were great the same as Supes, and the following weekend, we were already getting Joker casting speculations on the sequel. Nothing yet from the wb is alittle bizarre, plus they didnt make there 110 million goal on Tuesday that the WB head was predicting :(
 
Billy Batson said:
No it's not.
There will be a Brand New Superman Franchise starring: Tom Welling in seven years. The Screenplay which DOOMED SR, will be excellent in the new films.

Hey Billy do you realize Welling does NOT want to be Superman or the older Kent. He just doesn't want to. By then Welling will be TOO OLD.
 
there will be a sequel.... not only was WB pleased with the final product but the movie will make more money than Batman Begins. Sorry fan-boys, this isn't 'Hulk' we're talking about.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,288
Messages
22,080,662
Members
45,880
Latest member
Heartbeat
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"