Kevin
Doug not so Funny
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2005
- Messages
- 11,535
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
hey awesome! congratsElijya said:since febuary
hey awesome! congratsElijya said:since febuary
CantThinkOfAName said:Ed Brubaker's Captain America wasnt nominated for an Eisner because its not really Brubaker's best work. Sure, its really good but then its still no Catwoman, Gotham Central, Sleeper...maybe its on Batman level. I dont know if he was nominated for that stuff but he should have been. Hey, who know, maybe next year with Daredevil and Criminal.
It also wasnt nominated because it's Captain America, and no matter how good the book is written, Captain America still blows.![]()
My reasons still stand. Marvel just made the judgement call so the award committee wouldnt have to. Even they knew it wasnt as good as his DC workSin Eater said:See, you need to get your facts straight. Captain America wasn't SUBMITTED by Marvel. It wasn't nominated because it wasn't SUBMITTED, not because of your made up reasons. Seriously, the next time you want to post, don't embarrass yourself by not knowing your facts.
Not Jake said:You guys need to shut up. Seriously. Yes, Bendis and Millar are Marvel ringleaders, just like Johns and Morrison are kind of head-DCers. Bendis and Johns have both written at least a book too many in the last two years. They're stretched thin. But you can't blame everything on a single guy.
Here's what I'm questioning: How can you say Dan Slott is being sucked into Bendis's writing tone?Because Dan Slott should be writing light-hearted books all the time?
He wrote an Arkham Asylum book for DC. Was that Bendis' fault too
Joey Q said something to the effect of "Dan just pitched an idea and everyone likes it". Okay, that isn't "Bendis pitched an idea and Slott is gonna write it". Okay? Okay. Sometimes I just want to stick fiery coals up you guys' asses, and then fill your burnt ass with maggots covered in salt.
Sin Eater said:Yep, that's exactly right. Bendis doesn't know these characters and just tries to come up with his own versions of them. If he does do research, then he doesn't retain information very well. His "write for the trade" has hurt the monthly issue more than anything he has done has helped comics.
Dan Slott obviously sees that being on the Bendis "team" will benefit his career, as he has a forum at Bendis' website and now goes to the Marvel retreats, and really, who can blame him for it. Make no mistake, getting Bendis to approve his pitch was what got his pitch greenlit, because that's how Marvel works these days.
Darthphere said:I wish I had the time and drive to actually come up with a percentage of time he was in costume in the comic book. I think it would be interesting.
New Avengers, Ultimate Spider-Man, and Secret War were plagued with delays. But true, Bendis is not the only source of delay's the artist is too.CantThinkOfAName said:Bendis has rarely been the source of delays on his books.
Aren't Johns, Ellis, and Morrison also plagued with delayed books.And at most he writes five book at a time. Plenty of other writers do that, like Johns, Ellis, Morrison, Jenkins, and such.
hippie_hunter said:New Avengers, Ultimate Spider-Man, and Secret War were plagued with delays. But true, Bendis is not the only source of delay's the artist is too.
Aren't Johns, Ellis, and Morrison also plagued with delayed books.![]()
Yep. Green Lantern's been delayed almost every month, Planetary has a new issue maybe twice a year, and Seven Soldiers #1 just got pushed back a couple of seasons from April to November. I'm fairly sure GL's the fault of the artists, though, given that Johns works with very tardiness-prone artists like Carlos Pacheco and Ethan Van Sciver, and Planetary comes out so infrequently because it's kind of like Ellis and Cassaday's baby, so they go off and do their other projects and only return to Planetary when they can devote their full attention to it. I got nothing on Seven Soldiers, though. I don't read that.hippie_hunter said:Aren't Johns, Ellis, and Morrison also plagued with delayed books.![]()
For some reason, I remember reading about that book being delayed all the time. Maybe I just made that up.SpideyInATree said:Ultimate Spider-Man had delays?![]()
The book comes out every 2 weeks. Heh. If that's a delay then I must be ******ed.
I know Secret War was delayed due to the art, but New Avengers, that is because of Bendis in my opinion.Secret War was delayed due to Dell'Otto. And New Avengers...who knows what is up with that book. But considering that Bendis writes like a madman his books are usually on time.
Hence why I didn't mention Daredevil, I knew that that book was on time usually.Daredevil was usually on time. Though Powers is off and on these days.
Agreed.But, Bendis really has been stretching himself thin, in my eyes. Maybe he's not in his own eyes. But that's too many books to be writing at one time.
I'm still trying to figure out where the hell did I hear about delays about the book. I don't read Ultimate Marvel so I really couldn't confirm it myself.TheCorpulent1 said:USM was coming out twice a month for pretty much its entire run. I don't know if it's still doing so, but I've never heard of it having any serious problems with delays.
TheCorpulent1 said:USM was coming out twice a month for pretty much its entire run. I don't know if it's still doing so, but I've never heard of it having any serious problems with delays.
SpideyInATree said:Yeah, it's still coming out twice a month. And will continue to do so.
Though that's more Bagley's professionalism than Bendis, in my opinion.
hippie_hunter said:I know Secret War was delayed due to the art, but New Avengers, that is because of Bendis in my opinion.
gildea said:surely its a combination of both?
(though I agree its more challenging for an artist to do two books in a month)
SpideyInATree said:Possibly it's both. But Bendis is stretched VERY thin and if there were another artist besides Bags on the book, I bet there would be delays on the book.
gildea said:but he's ALWAYS been ahead of bagley!!
Do you have any actualy evidence of bendis being slow on USM and bagley having to play "catch up" ? (not asking to be a **** I just may be missing something).
TheCorpulent1 said:What I remember from when I was reading Bendis' DD was that Matt spent very little time as Daredevil and I felt like DD could've been removed entirely and the story wouldn't have suffered much.
SpideyInATree said:That's not what I'm saying. You haven't read all those interviews with Bendis where he's constantly praising Bagley about how fast and well he works, and that without Bagley they wouldn't be able to put out a bi-weekly book?
SpideyInATree said:I'm not saying Bendis is slow. But if your writing as many books as Bendis is...and you have an artist who is also stretched thin...you're not putting out a bi-weekly book.
hippie_hunter said:I'm still trying to figure out where the hell did I hear about delays about the book. I don't read Ultimate Marvel so I really couldn't confirm it myself.
gildea said:Sorry I appear to have misconstrued what you've said it seemed to be a dig a bendis and the implication was that bagley was covering his ass. If this isn't the case I apologise
True but that again would be an art delay and not a script delay because as said bendis is always a good few issues ahead of his artists.
something else springs to mind (when bendis WAS responsible for delaying a book) :
You may be thinking of the ultimate six mini. Bendis decided VERY late on he needed an extra issue to finish of the mini which caused a delay in getting the last issue (over a month I think).
gildea said:Longest run out of costum was 3 issues in the hardcore arc (which oddly had the larges number of super villain fights).
![]()
Um... I read part of the Echo arc, some stuff with Matt fighting ninjas in the street... I can't remember all of it off the top of my head. I only read DD for a short time, and it was a while ago. Daredevil's never really clicked with me for some reason.Kool-Aid said:What parts did you read of it that made it seem that way to you?