I think it's possable that Bruce could have been the Chameleon all those times. Who knows for sure?
I think it's possable that Bruce could have been the Chameleon all those times. Who knows for sure?
It would've been very foolish and unprofessional of him to have had the same face all the time though.
I think it's possable that Bruce could have been the Chameleon all those times. Who knows for sure?
It was just an idea, lol it would have been pretty cool.
Exactly my thoughts.He's not the Chameleon. Nothing he has done in these movies indicates criminal activity .
Impossible. Raimi wasn't signed on for Spider-Man 4 and 5 untill this year. I think that Campbell was just in every movie for a cameo.
As soon as I asked Raimi this question, he burst into laughter, as you can hear if you click on the video in this post. "I promised him we would write something because I really love putting him in the pictures," he then said. "I promised him a good, meaty role."
So there's your confirmation that Campbell will indeed have a significant part in "Spider-Man 4." But might that mean he'll play a villainpossibly Mysterioas some web speculation has suggested? As of now, nothing is set in stone.
Of what role the actor will eventually play, Raimi admitted, "I don't even know what it is yet."
so...he'll play a butcher?
The reporter also forgot to say that Raimi has no idea what role it could be yet. So hes not a villain that's for sure, (Thank you Jeebus)
EXCLUSIVE: Sam Raimi Confirms Bruce Campbell Will Have 'Meaty Role' In 'Spider-Man 4'
so...he'll play a butcher?
Spider-Man 1 - He names Spidey.
Spider-Man 2 - He keeps Peter away from seeing MJ's play.
Spider-Man 3 - He "supposedly" wants to help out Peter by proposing to MJ.
IF, and IF Bruce is indeed playing Chameleon, then it would kinda make sense...I mean, the Spider-Man series have had much worse plots then this, but when Bruce was in the first film, he most likely got to see the real names of the fighters...and with him naming him 'Spider-Man' and Spidey quickly becoming a hero, then he(Bruce) would know who Peter is,
and who his main love is, MJ, thus keeping him away from MJ's play, just to mess with his head, and then "helping" Peter out, because Peter is in love with her...and if Chameleon is in movie 4 and Bruce is indeed the villain, then Chameleon could have a very "meaty" role in the film, knowing who Spidey is already, knowing that Peter is still dating MJ, and knowing about MJ now.
Just speculation.
If they stretched that one out it would be the worst plot of any superhero movie I've ever heard of, never mind Spider-man series alone.
If indeed BC ever plays a villan or other roles in SM films, I hope they have the good sense to 'maintain the illusion' that he's been playing entirely different human beings in each of the 3 films so far.
lol of course not, the thing is we don't need anymore big stretches like those.A bigger stretch than Flint Marko's storyline? Or the smybiote attaching itself to Peter without an explanation? Or the change of the career of Dr. Connors that wasn't needed? Lol.
Nope, don't want him as Mysterio either. If anything, a small supporting role.So would you prefer him to be Mysterio instead? Just of the "illusion" aspect?
I honestly think Raimi should've given Bruce a villain role in the first place. His voice just screams "Mysterio" to me for some reason. Maybe because he sounds like the way Mysterio sounded back in the 2000 Spider-Man game for PS and N64.