Well, that's part of it. I said with 2nd films that fans tend to like them better than the first, but the general public remembers the first one better.Eros said:well since not many people consider spider-man 1 a classic, and spider-man 2 is considered the superior film. Its safe to say the 3rd film will not suffer from this "Cruse"..
I know you're joking. Because it would be laughable rediculous if you weren't and I'd have to take that statement down. Hard.ges681 said:lord of the rings didnt suffer from a third movie curse.
tonytr1687 said:One has to wonder, why has it been so hard to get a perfect superhero trilogy? Why do the directors always leave after the 2nd film?
Advanced Dark said:There is no curse. It's the material. Studios usually get cocky and think they can screw around with the formula and make the 3rd films a parody of the previous ones like Blade Trininity, Superman, Batman, and to a more severe extent Escape from LA. It was always the material. If they had made Superman 3 as good as 1 & 2 there would be no issue. X3 to me didn't suffer from that problem. It's the #1 film in the franchise now so while the insulated environment of the SHH forums might have a band of people who hated it...the rest of the moviegoers enjoyed it and can't wait for Wolverine and X4. Clearly Spiderman 3 has all the same talent back. There will be no failure there.
AVEITWITHJAMON said:X-Men 3 was complete and utter garbage. And the changes made to the storyline were a big factor in that. Now after hearing Raimi is going to alter Spidey's origin from Spidey 1 then this may suffer as well.If Sandman is made the real killer of Uncle Ben then this will bring the movie down a lot for me personally.
tonytr1687 said:I'll admit, if that happens I'll certainly be disappointed. Especially since it's become such a cliche in the superhero genre. First Batman, then Daredevil, then Elektra, now Spidey too?
fangrl06 said:Third movie curse? I liked Batman Forever.