TheSpectacular
BOLBISAUR
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2012
- Messages
- 1,950
- Reaction score
- 11
- Points
- 58
Isn't this the point where people make manips?
With all due respect, I just don't understand how you can be a fan of Keanu Reeves and hate Taylor Kitsch for being wooden. Keanu Reeves is probably one of THE worst actors in Hollywood. He's only found success because the movies he starred in had excellent plots like the ones you mentioned. Speed and The Matrix imho were good in spite of him, not because of him. Channing Tatum is basically in the same boat. But I respect your opinion.First off I love Keanu Reeves, he's my first movie star crush and I don't think he is a quarter as bad as people say he is. Loved him in The Matrix and Speed.
I know, right? I suspect part of the reason why they aren't coming is because people aren't sold on the casting choice. I mean, I would rather not have Gambit in the movies than have him be played by Channing Tatum. And I say this as THE biggest Gambit fangirl you will ever meet. But whatever.Isn't this the point where people make manips?
His woodenness doesn't bother anyone in the film because it's pretty unimportant. The Matrix is all about plot rather than acting - hence my assertion that he picks plot-driven movies.Well I would say his woodenness worked for Neo and it fit the character perfectly I couldn't imagine how different it would have been had Will Smith been in the role as was planned, Keanu is Neo.
How can someone who is wooden not be a bad actor? And hard work is fine and dandy, but it does not a talented actor make.Keanu Reeves, wooden or not, is not a bad actor. In fact, he's an excellent technical actor. He's also considered one of the hardest working actors in Hollywood by pretty much anyone who has worked with him.
With Jackman retiring Logan soon, Fox needs a new focal point of the X-Men. Guess Gambit is the heir apparent.
Well, he played supporting roles in Side Effects, Haywire, etc.And lets not forget that Tatum always plays the leading man in his movies.
While they might be setting Gambit up as a Wolvie replacement in terms of having a shady anti-hero, I don't think he's meant to be the new face of the franchise. The studio seems interested in exploring other avenues-- there probably won't be a singular focal point representing the X-Men from here on out, because that would be somewhat limiting. He might be a big character, sure-- but not on the level of Jackman's Wolverine.With Jackman retiring Logan soon, Fox needs a new focal point of the X-Men. Guess Gambit is the heir apparent.
I meant that he might be a big character in whatever future films he might show up in. Wasn't referring to his past incarnations or anything.Of course he's not as big of a character. He was in one movie that isn't very good. Played by someone else.
Tatum´s too bulky for the role.
Physically, Kitsch is way better suited for the role.
And actually he didn´t act that bad in XMW. The movie lacked direction and production, but wasn´t his fault either.
I've never bothered to read the Gambit solo run of comics , what would be the story for the spinoff film?
I think you have far too much faith in big film studios....that said, they wouldn't have cast Tatum if they didn't think they could physically mold him into the character. ..
I'm always puzzled when people bring this point up when others talk about Kitsch. Nobody has argued that Kitsch would be better than Tatum in terms of the box office. This is from a creative standpoint. They generally don't care if Tatum is box office gold right now. He is just NOT a good fit for Gambit to them. It's like someone remarking that they prefer oranges to bananas because they think the former tastes better and someone else countering by saying they should eat bananas instead because they are "a great source of potassium". Sure that's true, but what does that even have to do with what they were arguing?I think it's funny people keep bringing up Kitsch. Fact is Kitsch took a huge hit to his leading man status when mega budgeted John Carter and Battleship flopped and Savages brought in mediocre numbers. No it's technically not his "fault" and he could easily make a comeback (Lone Survivor was a hit and it goes on his record but people barely noticed he was in that Marky Mark film). Fox are not going to put potential spin-off on his shoulders, period. You don't have to like Tatum but he's doing great right now and you can easily see why Fox would want him over Kitsch.