So was this the film Liam Neeson shot when his wife died?
No, I believe it was Chloe.
So was this the film Liam Neeson shot when his wife died?
lol I can't believe someone wrote
"2/5 or 6/10" when mathematically those are two completely different scores lolz...
it's 3/5 or 6/10 that equivalent... makes no sense to say 2/5 or 6/10... that's like saying I'm gonna give it a 40% or a 60%...
Should be over $60m at least. Not bad but kind of in line with expectation. Next weekend will be the big test.Surprised no has mentioned the Friday estimates for this movie, $26 million, surely that means a $60-$70 million weekend at least?
I'm going to an Easter brunch.... And i'm gonna do it as a man.![]()
It was interesting comparing stuff from Percy Jackson with this one. CotT's Medusa was a lot better.
I think that this film, wether you liked it or not, it is in a safe spot. Meaning, this film never had big shoes to fill in, for afterall, the original film wasn't a "grand" or masterpiece of a film. Many Harryhausen fans would say it was the weakest of his films. Like the original film, this remake has its flaws and its charms. Sam Worthington may lack the commanding prescence of a Christian Bale or Gerard Butler, but he was still better than Harry Hamlin.Some of the dialogue in this film may be "stiff", but then so it was in the original. This could have been the intention in making this remake; to create a fun film that didn't take itself too seriously, much like the original. At the same time, this film showed more of what I always wished the original could have.
...didn't even flinch.......
Spoiler tags for this kind of stuff plsCause neither of them........