Cloverfield Director To Remake Let The Right One In

the only reason this movie is so slow and quiet( a good thing) is because the original movie was popular.

you think if the swedich movie never happened and if hollywood would do an adaptation that it would look the same?

BS BS and BS
 
I'm sure there was pressure to push the pace and amp up the spectacle, but I'm glad they didn't go for it.
 
lets hope the movie makes a lot of money so that it will inspire other studios for this kind of movies
 
Yeah, and I hope this does well and The Woman In Black with Daniel Radcliffe is good too...it's the most "British" new HAMMER film that is upcoming actually.
 
Last edited:
I read the book and loved it. I saw the film and loved that, too. This remake, which I'm hopeful for, well, does it have the older guy turn into a vampire-zombie thing like in the book? I hope so. I missed that from the original film.
 
2 hours is not enough time for all of this.
 
They have 2 weeks to include footage of the vampire-zombie pedophile with the dead erectus peni.
 
the only reason this movie is so slow and quiet( a good thing) is because the original movie was popular.

you think if the swedich movie never happened and if hollywood would do an adaptation that it would look the same?

BS BS and BS

Maybe, maybe not. When I heard Matt Reeves talk about the first film and reading the book, he seemed to get more out of it than most if the fans do.
 
Watched the original the other night and loved it. We really need more movies like this and Pan's Labyrinth.
 
chaseter

remaking S:TM could give us a better movie.remaking any movie could give us a better movie.lets remake TDK because i think the action in the finale was not clear enough ;)

First off, this isn't remaking the Swedish version, this is remaking the book in another light.

Secondly, the director and actors in it are fantastic so I don't see any reason to doubt this film at this point.

It is like you want this movie to suck. Yes the original movie is fantastic but lets wait to see if this version holds a candle to its predecessor. If not, I really don't see why you are in here constantly berating this movie. If this had terrible actors, terrible director, terrible writers, etc...then I could see your point. But, as of right now you have no point.

I mean your avatar is the new Tron movie and that is exact same thing this movie is doing. Tron is a sequel to a beloved cult movie 2 decades ago and revamped to suit today's audiences. Let Me In is remaking the book and revamping parts of it to suit American audiences.
 

And your point is?

Look, we get it. You don't like that they've made an American version of the film. But it's not the first time this has happened, and it won't be the last. You'd better get used to it.

Please don't continue to take up space on this thread complaining that the movie got remade and finding any excuse to bash it.
 
I like the posters and taglines alot

Those whove seen it how is the score
 
I like the posters and taglines alot

Those whove seen it how is the score
I haven't seen it, but Giacchino's work has gotten singled out by plenty of the reviews as being a highlight. A few:

Echoing the prevailing horrific/mournful vibe is Michael Giacchino's masterful score, which is simultaneously bone-chilling and achingly poignant.
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/film-reviews/let-me-in-film-review-1004114041.story

See it just to hear Michael Giacchino's phenomenal score (which I hope wins an Oscar)...
http://www.firstshowing.net/2010/09/11/toronto-review-video-matt-reeves-incredible-let-me-in/

Michael Giacchino's score is spare, haunting, atonal in a sort of early 60's Jerry Goldsmith way, and it really works on you as you watch. It's great stuff from one of the best film composers working.
http://www.hitfix.com/blogs/motion-captured/posts/tiff-let-me-in-review

Also helping to set the mood is the timbre of dread and ache of foreboding found in the score by Michael Giacchino.
http://theplaylist.blogspot.com/2010/09/tiff-10-review-let-me-in-is-rare-remake.html


I've only seen one review that singled it out as a negative (the reviewer at Joblo). They thought it was "over-wrought" and derivative of his work on Lost.

Overall, sounds pretty good to me.
 
And your point is?

Look, we get it. You don't like that they've made an American version of the film. But it's not the first time this has happened, and it won't be the last. You'd better get used to it.

Please don't continue to take up space on this thread complaining that the movie got remade and finding any excuse to bash it.
you are aware that there is no thread for the original movie.i just posted this since we talk about both movies in this thread.

i didnt want to start a fight. :dry::csad:
 
I'm much more concerned that HAMMER has a good comeback than devoting myself to the piety of the original version. If they can be an active and important production company again then there can more literate, classy horror movies that focus on cinematography, mood and acting and it can only be good for all genre fans.

Yeah, I'm hoping that a return of Hammer means good things for the horror genre. The #1 benefit being an interest in horror movie making that includes things like acting, art direction, and literate scripts. Hammer's old strength is that they were mostly making real movies. Granted, Hammer was never shy about the exploitation elements, but you can watch most of their output and appreciate the films' craftmanship as well. What's there to say about Saw or Paranormal Activity beyond whether it scared you or not?

The major studios have pretty much dropped the horror genre, so I think there's a niche to be filled by a studio that's interested in something slightly more ambitious than crummy remakes of 80s slasher movies and extremely cheap horror.

As for the remake thing, I think the history of film has shown that the classic original is never replaced. Sometimes there's another movie that will stand alongside it, but if a movie's good, it's good. Yojimbo wasn't replaced by A Fistful of Dollars. The Seven Samurai wasn't replaced by The Magnificent Seven. People still watch the Hawks Thing. Heck, Hammer's Dracula, Frankenstein, and Mummy movies exist right alongside Universal's. Arguably sometimes interest in the original is increased via remake as well.

Let the Right One In is a small, cult film, which generated slightly over $2 million in US ticket sales a couple of years ago. It's not going to be "discovered" in home video at this point. At least not without some sort of publicity like a remake drawing attention to the original.
 
Last edited:
you are aware that there is no thread for the original movie.i just posted this since we talk about both movies in this thread.

i didnt want to start a fight. :dry::csad:

Talking about the original film is fine. Endlessly griping that they remade this version without adding anything else to the conversation is not.
 
http://www.**************.com/images/uploads/let%20me%20in.jpg

It should actually say "He will...".
My opinion is:
Why turning a delicate, dark fairy tale, into a post-mo punk "love story"?
There was no need to do it.
 
It should actually say "He will...".
My opinion is:
Why turning a delicate, dark fairy tale, into a post-mo punk "love story"?
There was no need to do it.
...but all reports indicate they didn't. :huh:

If anything, the biggest problem seems to be that they didn't "turn it" into anything new. Just a well-made American version of the same thing.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"