I'd prefer Neil Marshall or Robert Rodriguez(using real locations, and sets. None of the CGI stuff like Sin City and Spy Kids). I honestly don't think a stylized director, someone like McTeigue, should be attached to direct a film about a character as violent and raw as Conan. The last thing i need is slo-mo fight scenes. It needs to be brutal and intense, and most importantly, REAL.
unless they use this old trick called "props" and or "model making"But it will be hard to create Conans World without using Heavy CGI Landscapes.
The Earth was very different in the Age of Conan with Dark unreal Forests,Swamps and Mountains with lot´s of Monsters and Creatures in it.
But it will be hard to create Conans World without using Heavy CGI Landscapes.
The Earth was very different in the Age of Conan with Dark unreal Forests,Swamps and Mountains with lot´s of Monsters and Creatures in it.
Not really. They can build sets, film in dense forest locations. They don't have to make it all CGI. That would suck. It's possible to make a Conan film, using real locations. It makes it that more real. I dont want to really see a "300"-esque Conan film.
and besides, creating Conan's world in CGI doesn't justify stylized action crap loaded with slow motion.
It's got a $100 million budget, I'm sure it'll be location shots.
EXCLUSIVE: HAS CONAN FOUND HIS NEW DIRECTOR?
By Devin Faraci
Yesterday we learned that Brett Ratner looked to be out of the director's chair on the new Conan movie, which possibly shoots this summer. The producers have been wasting no time in trying to get a new helmer for the franchise reboot, which after months of development still needs some script work and a leading actor. And according to my very trustworthy, very much correct in the past source, they've found their director:
James McTeigue.
The director of the first good Alan Moore adaptation (V For Vendetta) and the upcoming Ninja Assassin, McTeigue was long the Wachowski's first AD. There's no question that McTeigue has the action chops needed to bring the Hyborian barbarian's adventures to brutal, bloody life.
But will he have the money needed to do it right? My source fears that the loss of Ratner means a loss of budget. Ninja Assassin seems to be budgeted at around 50 million, and V For Vendetta was 54 million. Both look terrific - McTeigue is getting every penny on screen - but Conan will be much costlier, effects-wise. Will the current rumored 120 million dollar budget be slashed with this new director?
It's important to note that McTeigue hasn't signed any papers yet, so this deal is still in the making, but it looks like he's the guy Nu-Image/Millenium wants for the job.
And remember, the Wachowskis were once set to direct a Conan movie. They and McTeigue retain a tight relationship; might this Conan have their fingerprints all over it as much as McTeigues? That, to me, sounds like it could be a damn good thing.
IMO finding the right Conan will be more difficult than finding the right director for the project.
Yeah, also finding a Conan that looks like Buscema's or Frazetta's Conan and can act won't be that easy.Hopefully, he looks more like he's described in the books and less like Arnold.