• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

Cop handcuffs teen over sex with daughter

People keep going on about the guy being a cop, he is also a father and I don't know how many here even understand how that changes things for a man.

He's a father who abused his position as a cop.

Badge or no badge you have no right to touch someone just because your daughter is sleeping with them.

The cop needs to grow up. He wasn't given a badge and gun to fulfill personal revenge fantasies.
 
He's a father who abused his position as a cop.

Badge or no badge you have no right to touch someone just because your daughter is sleeping with them.

The cop needs to grow up. He wasn't given a badge and gun to fulfill personal revenge fantasies.

It's easy to sit on a high horse when it's not your 14 year old daughter that someone has been in.

I agree he made an error in how he approached it, he shouldn't have done it in front of the parents.
 
It's easy to sit on a high horse when it's not your 14 year old daughter that someone has been in.

I agree he made an error in how he approached it, he shouldn't have done it in front of the parents.
14 year old girls have sex all the time. Most fathers have enough self control to keep their hands to themselves.

The fact that this guuy has a badge and gun makes the lack of restraint even more disturbing.
 
14 year old girls have sex all the time. Most fathers have enough self control to keep their hands to themselves.

The fact that this guuy has a badge and gun makes the lack of restraint even more disturbing.

That's wonderful to know. :dry:
 
You want me too tell you why it's a bad idea to have sex with a 14 year old? how old are you buy chance?
Why is my age an issue?

I never said she should be sleeping with adults. I'm just saying it's not stupid for a teenage boy to try and get laid.
 
Why is my age an issue?

I never said she should be sleeping with adults. I'm just saying it's not stupid for a teenage boy to try and get laid.

Because you come off like a teenager who thinks rules are stupid like not drinking and ****ing when you are under age.

Yes it is, he's underage, but the fact you find it more disturbing that a Dad is looking out for his daughter than the fact a bunch of 14 year olds are having sex means I'm not surprised.
 
I'm didn't mean all of them. I just meant kids in their mid teens do have sex and for the most part the fathers exhibit self-control.

The fathers most likely don't know, I doubt most are "Hey honey, got your condoms with you?" No, It's not something that fathers just accept about their underage daughters, I can assure you.
 
I agree with Messiah. Sex at said age is not the issue. The same situation could have happened with two Seniors at the age of 17 and/or 18.

Even if both people were 18, the cop still would have been handled just the same. The only difference is the two teens would not be charge, and the boy could file suit rather than the parents.
 
I agree with Messiah. Sex at said age is not the issue. The same situation could have happened with two Seniors at the age of 17 and/or 18.

Even if both people were 18, the cop still would have been handled just the same. The only difference is the two teens would not be charge, and the boy could file suit rather than the parents.

There is a massive difference in a 14 year old and an 18 year old in the eyes of a father, plus how exactly would he pretend to arrest a guy for having sex over the age of consent?
 
Because you come off like a teenager who thinks rules are stupid like not drinking and ****ing when you are under age.

Yes it is, he's underage, but the fact you find it more disturbing that a Dad is looking out for his daughter than the fact a bunch of 14 year olds are having sex means I'm not surprised.
You act like the boy raped the girl. The girl is only months younger than the boy and she was a willing participant.

He could've looked out for his daughter by discussing the matter with the boy's parents instead of grabbing him and handcuffing him.
 
You act like the boy raped the girl. The girl is only months younger than the boy and she was a willing participant.

He could've looked out for his daughter by discussing the matter with the boy's parents instead of grabbing him and handcuffing him.

He's a father, he finds out some irk has been up in his daugher and you want him to do some do gooder sit down talk? that's just not the real world man.
 
I'm didn't mean all of them. I just meant kids in their mid teens do have sex and for the most part the fathers exhibit self-control.

The way it seemed to me, when I was a teen, was the idea of "out of sight, out of mind."


If two 16-year-old kids have been dating for over three month, and the father goes to bed every night thinking his little pumpkin hasn't flash her tots, or let the young man seek other situations in. . . said father is naive.
 
There is a massive difference in a 14 year old and an 18 year old in the eyes of a father, plus how exactly would he pretend to arrest a guy for having sex over the age of consent?

Then make it 17, Hunter. Damn.
 
Then make it 17, Hunter. Damn.

16 is the age of consent, but the difference between a 14 year old and a 17 year old is also huge, at 17 most girls are becoming a woman, at 14 they aren't.
 
He's a father, he finds out some irk has been up in his daugher and you want him to do some do gooder sit down talk? that's just not the real world man.

So because the girl decided to have sex with the guy, the father is allowed to abuse his power?
 
So because the girl decided to have sex with the guy, the father is allowed to abuse his power?

I've said on more than one occasion he shouldn't have approached him how he did.
 
In the state of California, the age of consent is full-on 18.
 
16 is the age of consent, but the difference between a 14 year old and a 17 year old is also huge, at 17 most girls are becoming a woman, at 14 they aren't.

I may be lost with your age argument.

My point is that father's should not be naive with girls at that age, and the cops overreacting CAN NOT be justified, because she is 14. She decided to follow through as well.
 
In the state of California, the age of consent is full-on 18.

:up:


Thanks.


Bottom line. Cop is wrong. Kids should be better attended to. The boy should be given a proper talking, and the girl needs a lesson in how to properly tease until college.
 
I may be lost with your age argument.

My point is that father's should not be naive with girls at that age, and the cops overreacting CAN NOT be justified, because she is 14. She decided to follow through as well.

It's not about being naive, if he doesn't know for sure anything is going on then what can he do or say? but when he knows for sure he is going to react and not simply brush it off.

I have never once justified what he did. I think it was dumb in modern day USA to try anything like he did as lawsuits are like a sport.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"