• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

Comics D-DAY!!! Civil War #2....confirmation. SPOILERS

SpideyInATree said:
And you know for a complete fact that there aren't little kids out there who are just discovering Spider-Man comics? There was a point in your life when you first discovered Spider-Man comics. Maybe through the cartoons that he's had through the decades. Maybe through an advertisement on television that caught your attention.

And if a little kid hears that Spider-Man unmasked to the world, don't you think that might spark a little interest? Get mom and dad to take him to a comic store to buy it? New readers aren't allowed to READ Spider-Man comics? It just has to be the same readers over and over again? Do you want the comic book industry to completely suffer and die because you simply don't believe that people who don't read comics can't have their interest peaked? No, sir...you are wrong.

Well, ummm... You do know that THIS BOOK, and the core Spidey titles ARE NOT aimed at kids? It's called CIVIL WAR for Christsakes! It's super-hero politics! And why the hell should Spidey unmasking interest a kid? Kids tend to go along, enjoy the art, and take a lot of stories as givens. That's why they're kids, they're still forming opinions, soaking things in. That's why kids aren't critics. If anything, it'll alienate kids, how the hell could they realte to any of this, it's no where near any of the Spider-Man stories they'd have seen on TV, or on film

The reason this story is in NEWSPAPERS and morning news shows, is because it's aimed at ADULTS. I can't remember the last time I saw an 11 year old avidly reading the New York Post or watching Larry King, can you?

And just 'cause adults haven't read Spidey in years, doesn't mean that they don't know the charachter or have an opinion. Did you know that Denny O'Neil got yelled at in cafe by the guy who worked there, and customers, when DC went ahead and killed Robin?

He realised that all the outrage he experienced, (it wasn't just in a cafe, it was in newspapers and morning news like Civil War,) was from people who hadn't picked up a comic in years. They didn't know it was Tim Drake, they thought it was Dick Grayson. He realised that people had an emotional investment in Robin, even though they hadn't read a comic in years. This is where Denny O'Neil states, and I quote "This is when I realised being an editor of DC comics isn't a job, we're the custodians of folklore." This is Denny O'Neil, THE MAN, himself.

Look, not all non comic geeks dig this idea. My girlfriend, (who's read bits of comics here and there, due to me,) was like; 'I don't get it, what do they want to do? I can't imagine anymore proper Spider-Man stories. Another friend of mine said; 'So I guess there's no more Spider-Man stories after this huh?' Other friends of mine liked the fact it was in newspapers, if only to text me, but it didn't make 'em want to buy it.

Look, I'm not saying I don't like Civil War, on the contrary, Millar is my fave writer, and I love it. The unmasking, I'm reserving judgment for the moment, but Marvel are treading VERY dangerous water here, it could lead to one of the greatest Spidey saga's ever, but there are too many areas where this can go really bad.

What I'm saying is, just 'cause a shock brings people's attention, don't mean it's a good thing. Doing things for shock value is usually a very bad idea, (Janet Jacksons boobgate anyone?) But we're going to have to wait a VERY long time to find out if this could be a great creatively driven decision, for shock value, or maybe because Joey Q has plain run out of ideas and won't listen to anyone aside himself.

New readers WILL SEE THIS. Just 'cause you're a new comic reader doesn't mean you don't know what a bad story is. If anything, they'll pick up Civil War, and if it has a bad ending, or childhood Spidey fans, (who haven't read a comic in years,) are upset by charachterisation, or certain plot developments, they'll never pick up a Marvel Comic again

That's what worries me
 
This is where Denny O'Neil states, and I quote "This is when I realised being an editor of DC comics isn't a job, we're the custodians of folklore." This is Denny O'Neil, THE MAN, himself.

I feel VERY compelled to quote this again for truth's sake.

THIS is where Marvel has gone very very wrong. I look very forward to the day when they realize this terrible mistake.
 
Won '08 said:
All of this is rubbish. So you know, The Civil War involved titles of Spider-Man have been the highest bought comic in the US as of their retail release. Subscriptions have shot up and people are price gouging back issues for re-ordered Spidey issues. People are angry, but the country is going crazy for more. Theres no way around it. Dont get mad because the majority of people who read Spids are still reading because of a story you dont like.

Go check the statistics. I suggest CSN or Informer.

Yes your post is pure rubish all it says to me is you like the unmasking, I get it you are pro unmask him.
The sales loss will not appear on the month he unamsked genius next's months sales would be where you would see if the unmasking is liked or not.
So what good would it do me to check sales of the month the shock came out again oh right none.
Next month if spiderman sales are up thats a different story and we shall see won't we.
Yeh the majority right why is it the majority because you said so umm yeh whatever you are not the majority no matter how important you try to spin yourself.
I have seen polls showing its pretty close 60/40 for and polls 60/40 against depending on the site you are at that seems pretty even to me not a majority in any way shape or form.

So please explain to me how you know all the BS you posted about people ordering back issues oh wait you made it up thats how you know because I have seen nothing anywhere describing how its created a furor and people are gouging sales prices on back issues much less people going crazy for stories of spiderman unmasked.

See I could throw outright lies out there like what you did but whats the point? really who are you trying to prove this to yourself? because I amnot buying the crap you are selling and neither are most people that think unmasking was a bad idea and just plain dumb.
Perhaps you should head to the people who like the unmaksling thread and post your its great BS and lies how back issues are being sold in a furor....
 
wolvie2020 said:
Well, ummm... You do know that THIS BOOK, and the core Spidey titles ARE NOT aimed at kids? It's called CIVIL WAR for Christsakes! It's super-hero politics! And why the hell should Spidey unmasking interest a kid? Kids tend to go along, enjoy the art, and take a lot of stories as givens. That's why they're kids, they're still forming opinions, soaking things in. That's why kids aren't critics. If anything, it'll alienate kids, how the hell could they realte to any of this, it's no where near any of the Spider-Man stories they'd have seen on TV, or on film

The reason this story is in NEWSPAPERS and morning news shows, is because it's aimed at ADULTS. I can't remember the last time I saw an 11 year old avidly reading the New York Post or watching Larry King, can you?

And just 'cause adults haven't read Spidey in years, doesn't mean that they don't know the charachter or have an opinion. Did you know that Denny O'Neil got yelled at in cafe by the guy who worked there, and customers, when DC went ahead and killed Robin?

He realised that all the outrage he experienced, (it wasn't just in a cafe, it was in newspapers and morning news like Civil War,) was from people who hadn't picked up a comic in years. They didn't know it was Tim Drake, they thought it was Dick Grayson. He realised that people had an emotional investment in Robin, even though they hadn't read a comic in years. This is where Denny O'Neil states, and I quote "This is when I realised being an editor of DC comics isn't a job, we're the custodians of folklore." This is Denny O'Neil, THE MAN, himself.

Look, not all non comic geeks dig this idea. My girlfriend, (who's read bits of comics here and there, due to me,) was like; 'I don't get it, what do they want to do? I can't imagine anymore proper Spider-Man stories. Another friend of mine said; 'So I guess there's no more Spider-Man stories after this huh?' Other friends of mine liked the fact it was in newspapers, if only to text me, but it didn't make 'em want to buy it.

Look, I'm not saying I don't like Civil War, on the contrary, Millar is my fave writer, and I love it. The unmasking, I'm reserving judgment for the moment, but Marvel are treading VERY dangerous water here, it could lead to one of the greatest Spidey saga's ever, but there are too many areas where this can go really bad.

What I'm saying is, just 'cause a shock brings people's attention, don't mean it's a good thing. Doing things for shock value is usually a very bad idea, (Janet Jacksons boobgate anyone?) But we're going to have to wait a VERY long time to find out if this could be a great creatively driven decision, for shock value, or maybe because Joey Q has plain run out of ideas and won't listen to anyone aside himself.

New readers WILL SEE THIS. Just 'cause you're a new comic reader doesn't mean you don't know what a bad story is. If anything, they'll pick up Civil War, and if it has a bad ending, or childhood Spidey fans, (who haven't read a comic in years,) are upset by charachterisation, or certain plot developments, they'll never pick up a Marvel Comic again

That's what worries me

Excellent post:up:
 
By the way, a spike in sales means the following:

1) People are buying it thinking it will be worth more. Perhaps even multiple copies. See: Death of Superman.
2) People are initially interested in what all the fuss is about.
3) The shock tactic worked. They normally do. This isn't brain surgery.
4) People like the idea.

ONE of these things mean people LIKE the idea. That's all. And I'm certain it's NOT the number one reason by any stretch.
 
They're not necessarily going for brand new readers either. They are also going for the type that read comics for years and stopped. Events like this tend to rekindle people's curiosity for the character.

For example, you know what got me into comics again? The first Spider-man movie. I had collcted comics for years when I was younger (11-14) but then I stopped when I got into highschool. After I saw it, I picked up the first volume of the Ultimate Spider-Man HC. After that I collected for a few months and then I stopped because it was more than I could afford at the time. I quit for 2 years or so and the first X-men Legends video game got me into comics again and this time it stuck.

All some people need is a catalyst that'll bring their interest in a character back into the forefront and with Spider-Man, this is it.
 
wolvie2020 said:
And just 'cause adults haven't read Spidey in years, doesn't mean that they don't know the charachter or have an opinion. Did you know that Denny O'Neil got yelled at in cafe by the guy who worked there, and customers, when DC went ahead and killed Robin?

He realised that all the outrage he experienced, (it wasn't just in a cafe, it was in newspapers and morning news like Civil War,) was from people who hadn't picked up a comic in years. They didn't know it was Tim Drake, they thought it was Dick Grayson. He realised that people had an emotional investment in Robin, even though they hadn't read a comic in years. This is where Denny O'Neil states, and I quote "This is when I realised being an editor of DC comics isn't a job, we're the custodians of folklore." This is Denny O'Neil, THE MAN, himself.

Slight correction here, Wolvie. It was Jason Todd, not Tim Drake, that was Robin at the time and who the Joker killed. However, you still made a very excellent point and the story involving Denny O'Neil's experience when DC killed Robin should be a lesson to everyone even thinking about getting into comics.

NateGrey said:
I have seen polls showing its pretty close 60/40 for and polls 60/40 against depending on the site you are at that seems pretty even to me not a majority in any way shape or form.

Marvel's own offical website has a poll question which asks: "How do you feel about Spider-Man unmasking?" The results?

"I love it! Bring on the new stories!" 43%
"I hate it! Spider-Man will never survive this!" 58%

13619 total votes.

http://www.marvel.com/home?poll_qa=a

It's interesting when you compare this with Newsarama--a site catering mostly to those already reading comic books--which has a far more favorable response towards the unmasking.

*Awesome! About time! I can't wait to see where this goes! 1820 (16.46%)
*Interesting...Have my reservations, but I'll give Marvel a chance at this. 4208 (38.07%)
*Uh oh... not sure I like this. I fear it could be a bad move. 2356 (21.31%)
*How dare they!? Worst thing to happen to Spidey in a long time. Hate it! 1819 (16.46%)
I really don't care strongly either way. 851 (7.70%)

11054 total votes

http://www.newsarama.com/forums/showthread.php?t=74080
 
Marvel believes that it will bring in new readers as well keep hardcore reader from seeing the same old thing. Decisions that Marvel has made have kept readers wondering, what the heck were they thinking, but they seem to either change the story of the character or go back to basics. We will just have to wait and see
 
stillanerd said:
Slight correction here, Wolvie. It was Jason Todd, not Tim Drake, that was Robin at the time and who the Joker killed. However, you still made a very excellent point and the story involving Denny O'Neil's experience when DC killed Robin should be a lesson to everyone even thinking about getting into comics.

How much of an ass do I sound...

Sorry, I was @ work and trying to type frequently
 
wolvie2020 said:
How much of an ass do I sound...

Sorry, I was @ work and trying to type frequently

Just keeping you on your toes. Happens to the best of us. :up: :)
 
wolvie2020 said:
Well, ummm... You do know that THIS BOOK, and the core Spidey titles ARE NOT aimed at kids? It's called CIVIL WAR for Christsakes! It's super-hero politics! And why the hell should Spidey unmasking interest a kid? Kids tend to go along, enjoy the art, and take a lot of stories as givens. That's why they're kids, they're still forming opinions, soaking things in. That's why kids aren't critics. If anything, it'll alienate kids, how the hell could they realte to any of this, it's no where near any of the Spider-Man stories they'd have seen on TV, or on film

The reason this story is in NEWSPAPERS and morning news shows, is because it's aimed at ADULTS. I can't remember the last time I saw an 11 year old avidly reading the New York Post or watching Larry King, can you?

And just 'cause adults haven't read Spidey in years, doesn't mean that they don't know the charachter or have an opinion. Did you know that Denny O'Neil got yelled at in cafe by the guy who worked there, and customers, when DC went ahead and killed Robin?

He realised that all the outrage he experienced, (it wasn't just in a cafe, it was in newspapers and morning news like Civil War,) was from people who hadn't picked up a comic in years. They didn't know it was Tim Drake, they thought it was Dick Grayson. He realised that people had an emotional investment in Robin, even though they hadn't read a comic in years. This is where Denny O'Neil states, and I quote "This is when I realised being an editor of DC comics isn't a job, we're the custodians of folklore." This is Denny O'Neil, THE MAN, himself.

Look, not all non comic geeks dig this idea. My girlfriend, (who's read bits of comics here and there, due to me,) was like; 'I don't get it, what do they want to do? I can't imagine anymore proper Spider-Man stories. Another friend of mine said; 'So I guess there's no more Spider-Man stories after this huh?' Other friends of mine liked the fact it was in newspapers, if only to text me, but it didn't make 'em want to buy it.

Look, I'm not saying I don't like Civil War, on the contrary, Millar is my fave writer, and I love it. The unmasking, I'm reserving judgment for the moment, but Marvel are treading VERY dangerous water here, it could lead to one of the greatest Spidey saga's ever, but there are too many areas where this can go really bad.

What I'm saying is, just 'cause a shock brings people's attention, don't mean it's a good thing. Doing things for shock value is usually a very bad idea, (Janet Jacksons boobgate anyone?) But we're going to have to wait a VERY long time to find out if this could be a great creatively driven decision, for shock value, or maybe because Joey Q has plain run out of ideas and won't listen to anyone aside himself.

New readers WILL SEE THIS. Just 'cause you're a new comic reader doesn't mean you don't know what a bad story is. If anything, they'll pick up Civil War, and if it has a bad ending, or childhood Spidey fans, (who haven't read a comic in years,) are upset by charachterisation, or certain plot developments, they'll never pick up a Marvel Comic again

That's what worries me

I get what you are saying. But just because it's called "Civil War" doesn't mean it's going to push kids away from it or something. It's got pretty pictures of Iron Man, Captain America, and Spider-Man. Tis enough.

Wait, maybe I shouldn't say "kid". Maybe...young adult, heh. That's the more politically correct term I'm supposed to use. No, an 8 year old isn't going to bite, maybe...but doubtful. But 12 or 13...that's a different story. That's the "kid" I'm talking about. I started reading Spider-Man comics, seriously, around the age of 12. I had read comics when I was younger but it never really truly stuck with me, until I got a little older.

What was the FIRST big Spider-Man storyline that I read? MAXIMUM CARNAGE. I remember picking up Spider-Man Unlimited # 1 with the big Carnage monster behind Spider-Man, Ron Lim did excellent pencils on that cover by the way, and being enthralled with it. And Maximum Carnage was VIOLENT. People were dying left and right and here I am...a 12 year old reading it and having fun with it. So, yes, it's possible. And not too long after Maximum Carnage was the lingering Clone Saga, which got me REALLY into Spider-Man.

That sucks your friends and girlfriend feel that way. I show my friends the comics and they love it, and ultimately go out and buy a couple issues to revisit their childhood memories. Does it really stick all the time? No. But as resident comic book geek of my circle of friends it's my duty to properly inform them of comic book situations. No, my friends don't really react the way that most people here would react. Most don't have those emotional connections with the characters, they just like the mystique that the comic book provides, and I can respect that. Too bad some people can't respect that. :O

I know what Denny O'Neil said, I saw the Comic Book documentary on The Learning Channel as well, heh. But they didn't go into the story of the gimmick of Jason Todd being killed now did they? How there was a 900 number set up, one to kill him and one to keep him alive. It was a well known fact that it was actually fixed by DC creators.

But that's not the point...heh. I understand what you're meaning with that. Yeah, people do have emotion in the characters, as do I. It's the reason why I dropped the titles back in the late 90's because of the ridiculous manner that they revived Aunt May. I didn't read a COMIC BOOK for about 5 years after that. I dropped them all. Spider-Man, X-Men, Spawn, Batman, etc.

And that brings me to my next point. You're worried that people will be pushed away forever? As someone else has said...all you need is that SPARK to bring you back. The first Spider-Man movie was my spark. I began to see what the titles were like again. I pick up The Amazing Spider-Man. HOLY SCHNIKES! John Romita Jr., my favorite Spider-Man artist of the late 90's is on the title! SCORE! I read it and come to find out this...JMS guy...writes a pretty interesting Peter Parker. Who's this Ezekiel fella? Hmmm? It sparked my interest in the comics again. And then my friend goes, "There's a new title where Spider-Man is a teenager again, it's called Ulitmate Spider-Man. And it's written by this kick ass writer, Bendis". My first reaction was, "What's a Bendis?". But after that I was sucked into that. Then Daredevil. Then Batman sucked me in again with Hush. Then I started seeing things I never thought I'd read. So many unbelievable artists and writers and I've missed SO MUCH because I was so PISSED OFF at one little thing about my Spider-Man comics 5 years earlier. And I've stuck ever since. Yes, things have happened that I've hated and the choice to drop the titles has crossed my mind...but it's never come to that because I don't find what's going on to be horrible or bad in anyway.

When it comes to the unmasking and the Civil War storyline. Well, my opinion on it is skewed by the comments of Quesada and JMS saying they want to take Spider-Man back to a Stan Lee-esque Spider-Man. And with the knowledge of the great Jeph Loeb coming onto an ongoing in 2007, my view of this storyline is a positive one. And maybe that's where the animosity lies between the different sides of posters. Yes, I do not word myself well sometimes and I get a little passionate because I'm being attacked simply because I have a different opinion. But, ultimately, my outlook is always positive. Does that make me a "zombie" a "sheep". I guess maybe to some of the posters around here, sure, go ahead. But I know what I enjoy and I know that I really like the character of Spider-Man. I gave up on the character once and I regretted it. Yes, bad stuff has happened but there has been a lot of good in between, in my view. But it's my dime. And I'm enjoying the ride so well right now. A storyline I've been completely looking forward to since I've become a serious fan of Spider-Man is becoming a reality. I'm sorry if I'm a little happy and overly excited.

But my readership started at the age of 12, serious readership. And there wasn't a movie trilogy on the horizon. Or an Internet. Or a message board of people who can inform me of so MUCH about the character. I took a chance on Spider-Man with no outside opinions saying, "This isn't how Spider-Man should be written" or "You're not a REAL fan of Spider-Man if you like THIS". I just had my own opinion and my own mind. Is it wrong that I like things most people here don't like? No, I don't think it's wrong at all. But it would be nice if people didn't make it an agenda to try and "prove me wrong". I'm not going to budge...at all. So, if you don't like my opinions and I'm "like talking to a wall" then put me on ignore if it REALLY bothers you that much. But, otherwise, maybe we can have rational discussions, much like I'm trying to do here with wolvie.
 
NateGray said:
Yes your post is pure rubish all it says to me is you like the unmasking, I get it you are pro unmask him.
The sales loss will not appear on the month he unamsked genius next's months sales would be where you would see if the unmasking is liked or not.
So what good would it do me to check sales of the month the shock came out again oh right none.
Next month if spiderman sales are up thats a different story and we shall see won't we.
Yeh the majority right why is it the majority because you said so umm yeh whatever you are not the majority no matter how important you try to spin yourself.
I have seen polls showing its pretty close 60/40 for and polls 60/40 against depending on the site you are at that seems pretty even to me not a majority in any way shape or form.

So please explain to me how you know all the BS you posted about people ordering back issues oh wait you made it up thats how you know because I have seen nothing anywhere describing how its created a furor and people are gouging sales prices on back issues much less people going crazy for stories of spiderman unmasked.

See I could throw outright lies out there like what you did but whats the point? really who are you trying to prove this to yourself? because I amnot buying the crap you are selling and neither are most people that think unmasking was a bad idea and just plain dumb.
Perhaps you should head to the people who like the unmaksling thread and post your its great BS and lies how back issues are being sold in a furor....

Its called spin and a few of the marvel zombies are trying there best to do that.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,262
Messages
22,074,422
Members
45,876
Latest member
kedenlewis
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"