But again, if the settled cut is longer than that, and you're talking a major cut of a scene or such that you didn't want to cut at all...just to make that running length...it's just not enough to compromise this film from someone of this level and for this event. IMAX is important, of course, but it's also still not the majority of the screenings and revenue generation for this film...of which a running limit of 170m does not apply. So that cut will, in the opinion of the filmmaker, compromise the movie everywhere it plays...just to fit it into one IMAX reel when they can do an intermission-version instead.
I'm sure he kept it in mind, but it probably wasn't an actual decision maker past something that could shave a few seconds or a minute in credits or trimming some longer establishing shots, at most. And honestly, that's even less likely than missing that 170m by several minutes. If he they had to, the'd go with an intermission...and people would probably be at least a little better with a break in watching the event of the final Nolan Batman film, than what was even a 3D version of what's perhaps the most overexposed (release-wise) movie in history in Titanic.
Being exactly 2:45 more likely means that if anything was shaved to meet that time, it was pretty minor and small.
I didn't mean that the movie was filmed over 3 hours and cut down a lot to get to 2:45. I meant that from the beginning it was probably agreed upon to keep it at the max 2:45 instead of going over so they planned, wrote, and filmed accordingly.




