def28
Avenger
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2008
- Messages
- 12,746
- Reaction score
- 183
- Points
- 75
I guess I would be more inclined to agree with you, if it didn't seem like the character you're getting hung up on is Kitty Pryde. Her mutation is her protection and affords her more safety than any body armor ever could. Moreover, when she's seemingly vulnerable, she's tucked away in a steel vault, or mountain, with an entire team of super powered people sacrificing themselves for her. While I understand they have to put her in something, I think it's also understandable why that something isn't body armor akin to that of a front line brawler, like Wolverine.
With the exceptions of the characters I mentioned I have issues with the way they all are dressed. They don't look battle torn or roughing it, nor battle ready. Either would have been the better route and made more sense imo. With Kitty I disagree, she's still vulnerable in more then a few situations as well as the main target. Sentinels don't have a problem getting into vaults, temples or anything like that. If that Sentinel at the intro was a few seconds earlier she would have been toast. Nobody would have saved her. Piece of rock, blast ricochet or whatever hits her arm she's done. Mission done.
Just really don't see it as being pointless, and if she was in a more protective outfit I doubt think there would be anyone really complaining. But all good, agree to disagree.
Last edited: