Flint Marko
Bring me Thanos 🦉
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 18,790
- Reaction score
- 6,493
- Points
- 103
Didn't like that either. Lousy Whedon
lol
Didn't like that either. Lousy Whedon
Come on, guys, let's not all of a sudden turn on Singer and forget X1, X2 and DOFP. Apocalypse is looking awesome too. Yes, his X-men are not a direct translation of the comic page but they're damn fine, pivotal comic book films.
For the record, I also would be curious to see what Miller could do with an X-men movie. LOVED Negasonic's X-costume. It'd be cool to see similar looking costumes on the main X-Men.t:
It is the law of the new. Only the new person is worthy, toss out the previous champ. See how fans have turned on Whedon and Nolan.
...and Sam Raimi.
I will never get it.
Love the action, the villains, but barely cared for any of the characters. I think the Spider-Man Movies are the only Movies, where I don't care the slightest about the protagonist and his love interest. They were just so bland and uninteresting. I'd trust Raimi with a Sinister Six Movie, but I wouldn't want him to helm another Spider-Man Movie.
It's pretty telling how Fox's most successful Marvel property to date looks and feels like a real Marvel movie (lighter tone, embracing the source material) than their usual approach.
The early Superman and Raimi Spiderman films are a lighter tone and embrace the source material too. Those films are also influential.
The early Superman and Raimi Spiderman films are a lighter tone and embrace the source material too. Those films are also influential.
Undoubtedly. I've always said the MCU was most heavily influenced by the Raimi films.
My comment was that Fox finally deviated from their formula and they were rewarded for it. Hopefully that's a sign of things to come.
You'd lose money. The version of Fantastic Four they produced CUT the more comic book inspired elements of the original script. They had no interest in making a version of Fantastic Four that had Moloids, Galactus, or Ben Grimm in a trench coat when he went out in public. Fantastic Four was a colossal screwup on all levels, not just Trank.
Fox wanted a dark and gritty Fantastic Four just as much as Trank. You're buying into the idea that it was all Trank's fault. He's an idiot that blew it throughout the whole process, but Fox bought into it because it's what they had pushed for. Hell, they specifically wanted a less loyal Fantastic Four back when Peyton Reed was supposed to do a Fantastic Four movie years ago. You're simply incorrect about Fox not making a push for a Fantastic Four that departed heavily from the source material.
Which they have since unfortunately ditched. Best costumes in any X-men movie by far. Only Deadpools is better.
I don't see your point. All I'm saying is that Deadpool has injected much needed life into the X-men franchise by embracing the source material as opposed to shying away from it.
And that I agree with.
My point is that not all studios operate like Marvel Studios, nor do they need to. Too many people see it as just one thing. As "the Fox films," when it's very clear that the tone and style of the films is very much informed by their filmmakers and the creative team involved.
For example, Matthew Vaughn comes in and introduces the yellow and blue suits. Then Bryan Singer takes the helm, and opts for black suits.
Am I excited about future X-Men films being more faithful to the source material? Of course!
I agreed with the Fox hate when Tom Rothman was on board and the studio was pretty much putting out c**p after c**p, even outside of comic book adaptations, and every blockbuster (except for James Cameron's, Steven Spielberg's or Baz Luhrman's) or commercial film used to be dumbed down trash for the most part.
But the studio has gotten much better, and has been taking chances. And Deadpool was one of them. And once they pulled the trigger on that, they did it 100%. So instead of constantly trashing the studio, complaing about this "Fox way" and talking about how rights should revert to Marvel (which is stuff I've really heard too often now) why don't we just sit back and see what the future has in store? Especially now that Deadpool can be seen as a great turning point.
This movie is clearly leaving the backdoor open for this to exist in the MCU.
My point is that not all studios operate like Marvel Studios, nor do they need to. Too many people see it as just one thing. As "the Fox films," when it's very clear that the tone and style of the films is very much informed by their filmmakers and the creative team involved.
Am I excited about future X-Men films being more faithful to the source material? Of course! .
But the studio has gotten much better, and has been taking chances. And Deadpool was one of them. And once they pulled the trigger on that, they did it 100%. So instead of constantly trashing the studio, complaing about this "Fox way" and talking about how rights should revert to Marvel (which is stuff I've really heard too often now) why don't we just sit back and see what the future has in store? Especially now that Deadpool can be seen as a great turning point.