Her crusade confuses me.
As is often the case with such violence, it eventually becomes numbing. By its midpoint, once the novelty of a superhero movie showing super levels of violence wears off, the thinness and lack of spark in the fight scenes becomes more readily apparent. By the film's end, they are hard to distinguish from any other superhero fare. Similarly, lack of imagination keep the film's prodigious swearing and occasional nudity from feeling like anything original. They appear to be shoe-horned into the film simply because they could be, not because they serve an essential purpose. And here we thought "Deadpool" would do something different.
I think you are mis-remembering a lot of Blade and Blade 2.
No, I'm not. I've seen those 2 movies multiple times and most of the more bloody and gory scenes in those movies could have either been toned down to be made less gory and bloody without screwing up the film.
Surprisingly and after all the complaints....Faraci gave this a fresh review.
http://birthmoviesdeath.com/2016/02/07/deadpool-review-reddits-gonna-love-this-one
My opinion in this case happens to be fact. Up until the Quesada/Jemas editorial regime, Deadpool comics were CCA approved all ages comics. If you know anything about Marvel in the before the Quesada/Jemas regime took over, you would know that they were very strict on the content in their comics (even more strict then the CCA). So they took great strides to depict gruesome violent action scenes in less gory and graphic manner WITHOUT sugarcoating or lessening the point of the story.
To be fair, several of these positive reviews are more of a barely passable than a best movie ever. Metacritic isn't being quite as kind (65 last I checked).
Definitely sounds like a solid movie, though.
RT is just the percentage of people who thought it was okay (3/5 or better). The average rating gives a better indication of the movie's quality, which is sitting at 7.8/10 right now.
RT is just the percentage of people who thought it was okay (3/5 or better). The average rating gives a better indication of the movie's quality, which is sitting at 7.8/10 right now.
I said the same thing one post above!
Here's a quote from that review.
Yeah, just like I figured. And this is one (but not the only) of the reasons why I think that this movie should have been rated PG-13. I think (and I could be wrong) that if the DP movie is a hit (which I think it will be), an R rated sequel will not do as well since the novelty of the R rated content would have worn off after the first movie. It would be like Daffy Duck's greatest act in that old Bugs Bunny cartoon.
[YT]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjMHOVxd8Yc[/YT]
She makes a lot of contradictory statements.Why does her "crusade" confuse you?

That is one thing seem to miss out on. Have a crusade all you want, but please make sense.She makes a lot of contradictory statements.
Glad to see this is getting good reviews. Now let's hope it's a hit at the box office.
Ryan Reynolds deserves a hit. Long over due.