Discussion: Racism - Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
As much as it pains me to speak on behalf of hate groups, I do have to agree with you here. :( It is dangerous to shut only certain people down. The trick is how do we do things peacefully? Doesn't seem like we can right now.

I mean what are we really talking about here?? Someone punched a nazi in the face...I'll repeat: SOMEONE PUNCHED A NAZI IN THE FACE....BFD. 60 years ago the guy would have gotten a medal.. today the president of america sides with the nazis???? WTF???:loco::loco::loco:
 
There is a difference between punching someone in the face for their beliefs versus punching them for their actions.

Nazis rounded up Jews and killed them. They committed genocide. The asshats in Charlottesville, however deplorable their beliefs may be, are just espousing beliefs.

It may be an unfortunate line of thinking, but unless they commit a crime, there is really nothing anyone can do. And punching them will only turn them into martyrs.
 
Yeah, whether you have sympathy for them or not, nobody should go around punching people in the face.
 
But dear me, will I have a world of a time caring.
 
I mean what are we really talking about here?? Someone punched a nazi in the face...I'll repeat: SOMEONE PUNCHED A NAZI IN THE FACE....BFD. 60 years ago the guy would have gotten a medal.. today the president of america sides with the nazis???? WTF???:loco::loco::loco:
In no way did he endorse the neo-Nazis. He stated that both sides were at fault for resorting to violence, which goes against how you're supposed to solve political disagreements or ugly ideas. Walking up to people and assaulting them because they are saying stuff you disagree with is childish and unlawful. All the fighting and assaulting does is inflame tensions and harden resolves without creating any sort of dialogue to diffuse the situation.
 
In no way did he endorse the neo-Nazis. He stated that both sides were at fault for resorting to violence, which goes against how you're supposed to solve political disagreements or ugly ideas. Walking up to people and assaulting them because they are saying stuff you disagree with is childish and unlawful. All the fighting and assaulting does is inflame tensions and harden resolves without creating any sort of dialogue to diffuse the situation.

#notallnazis
 
I do think there's a distinction to be made. You can't say he endorsed the Nazis when he outright condemned the Nazis on multiple occasions. He downplayed the actions of the Nazis in favor of bashing the left.
 
I'd have to agree, what Trump says in front of a camera should pretty much be ignored out of hand.
 
That only leaves his tweets, and he contradicts those every other day... so we're left with nothing. What do we base our opinions on?
 
That only leaves his tweets, and he contradicts those every other day... so we're left with nothing. What do we base our opinions on?

His behavior, and the absolute incongruence between what he says and does - and the fact that he's been caught in lies when people put him on the spot all the time. Not to mention there's like 4 decades of character analysis provided by everyone who had the misfortune to meet him, and almost everyone's assessment seems to be that's he's a compulsively lying narcissist who forces himself on women.

We've seen enough anecdotal evidence to make a relatively solid case that this guy is not fit for office, he's been a lying piece of **** his entire life according to the testimony of more people than you can shake a stick at.

I mean, logically, shouldn't a president that can't even remain consistent in his tweets be dropped like a bad habit? America basically has a senile and incompetent version of Gordon Gekko at the wheel, surely that's dangerous for the average American.
 
I do think there's a distinction to be made. You can't say he endorsed the Nazis when he outright condemned the Nazis on multiple occasions. He downplayed the actions of the Nazis in favor of bashing the left.
No, he wanted to place them on an even playing field. If the Nazi are bad, you are bad to for hating Nazis. And thus the hate is real for the poor racist. And considering he has made his racism very clear on multiple occasions, it obvious what he is doing.

Also Trump is not a good liar to non-idiots and evil people who want to eat it up. It is obvious what he means, what he is saying, because he does the same exact thing every time he lies. When the media gets to close to the truth, he does the same exact thing. You see it with Russia, his racism, his sexual assaults, his lies about how rich he is, everything.
 
No, he wanted to place them on an even playing field.

Right, and it blew up in his face as does everything he says. He's probably so ****ing stupid that he thinks the Nazis are a valuable asset because they happen to be part of his base. He can't stand the fact that the right-wingers are (justly) singled out as the bad guys in this situation, so he tries to overcompensate. I don't think he's specifically endorsing Nazis or white nationalists, he just sees this as a left vs. right issue, and he's standing with the right. I know it's a trivial distinction, but whatever.
 
Right, and it blew up in his face as does everything he says. He's probably so ****ing stupid that he thinks the Nazis are a valuable asset because they happen to be part of his base. He can't stand the fact that the right-wingers are (justly) singled out as the bad guys in this situation, so he tries to overcompensate. I don't think he's specifically endorsing Nazis or white nationalists, he just sees this as a left vs. right issue, and he's standing with the right. I know it's a trivial distinction, but whatever.
I understand what you are saying. What I would say is he will endorse whatever he thinks works, and his reasoning for it doesn't matter when it is white nationalism. Also, at best he has has no love for minorities, but I'd say he has shown himself to be pretty racist through his business practices.
 
Last edited:
Right, and it blew up in his face as does everything he says. He's probably so ****ing stupid that he thinks the Nazis are a valuable asset because they happen to be part of his base. He can't stand the fact that the right-wingers are (justly) singled out as the bad guys in this situation, so he tries to overcompensate. I don't think he's specifically endorsing Nazis or white nationalists, he just sees this as a left vs. right issue, and he's standing with the right. I know it's a trivial distinction, but whatever.

Also, he's a racist.
 
Anyone watch the Vice documentary on the events in Charlottesville? The main Nazi they followed acted all tough. Well, guess what happened when he found out the police were looking for him.

 
In no way did he endorse the neo-Nazis. He stated that both sides were at fault for resorting to violence, which goes against how you're supposed to solve political disagreements or ugly ideas. Walking up to people and assaulting them because they are saying stuff you disagree with is childish and unlawful. All the fighting and assaulting does is inflame tensions and harden resolves without creating any sort of dialogue to diffuse the situation.

how do you diffuse a situation with organizations like white supremacists and nazis....two groups whos history involves murder, terror and subjugation.... just tell me what kind of conversation can say a black man or a jewish man have that will diffuse the issue with these people??


I'll wait..
 
Last edited:
His behavior, and the absolute incongruence between what he says and does - and the fact that he's been caught in lies when people put him on the spot all the time. Not to mention there's like 4 decades of character analysis provided by everyone who had the misfortune to meet him, and almost everyone's assessment seems to be that's he's a compulsively lying narcissist who forces himself on women.

We've seen enough anecdotal evidence to make a relatively solid case that this guy is not fit for office, he's been a lying piece of **** his entire life according to the testimony of more people than you can shake a stick at.

I mean, logically, shouldn't a president that can't even remain consistent in his tweets be dropped like a bad habit? America basically has a senile and incompetent version of Gordon Gekko at the wheel, surely that's dangerous for the average American.

He seriously needs to go. I don't get how he can be this great negotiator when his opinions flit this way and that. He's never consistent. :(
 
There is a difference between punching someone in the face for their beliefs versus punching them for their actions.

Nazis rounded up Jews and killed them. They committed genocide. The asshats in Charlottesville, however deplorable their beliefs may be, are just espousing beliefs.

It may be an unfortunate line of thinking, but unless they commit a crime, there is really nothing anyone can do. And punching them will only turn them into martyrs.

before the nazi's fired up the gas chambers they espoused beliefs first... the kkk espoused beliefs to justify acts of terror and murder on american citizens. I don't know about you but I'm not waiting around to see exactly how serious this generation of those a-holes are.

theres a reason why jews say NEVER AGAIN.
 
Last edited:
before the nazi's fired up the gas chambers they espoused beliefs first... the kkk espoused beliefs to justify acts of terror and murder on american citizens. I don't know about you but I'm not waiting around to see exactly how serious this generation of those a-holes are.

theres a reason why jews say NEVER AGAIN.

So what are you suggesting? :huh:
 
Anyone watch the Vice documentary on the events in Charlottesville? The main Nazi they followed acted all tough. Well, guess what happened when he found out the police were looking for him.

 
I'm saying I'm not shedding a tear or losing sleep if someone punches a nazi in the face.

LhGByrWl.jpg
 


"But you had a lot of people in that group that were there to innocently protest, and very legally protest -- because I don't know if you know, they had a permit. The other group didn't have a permit."


"What about the alt-left that came charging at -- excuse me, what about the alt-left that came charging at the, as you say, the alt-right? Do they have any semblance of guilt? Let me ask you this: What about the fact that they came charging with clubs in their hands, swinging clubs? Do they have any problem?I think they do."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"