• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

Discussion: The REPUBLICAN Party

Status
Not open for further replies.
yeah right. there are no racists in the republican party. they don't send each other little cartoons and giggle. they don't appeal to the xenophobes and homophobes and white supremacists at all. they don't target black neighborhoods with their vote caging mailing campaigns. nope never happens. all those folks at the Palin rallies weren't really acting racist. they were just pretending for the cameras right? the young republicans would never elect a woman who thought the word "coon" was funny and appropriate to head their organization would they?

Well I think a lot of that is generalization and that you can't really call the whole party racist. It's always the actions of the few that get the most attention. There are racists in both parties too, especially if you get down south.
 
People need to get over crap like this. He has a knife... Who cares? It's not like he's holding it to a baby's throat or something... Society has become so over-sensitive.

icon14.gif
 
yeah right. there are no racists in the republican party. they don't send each other little cartoons and giggle. they don't appeal to the xenophobes and homophobes and white supremacists at all. they don't target black neighborhoods with their vote caging mailing campaigns. nope never happens. all those folks at the Palin rallies weren't really acting racist. they were just pretending for the cameras right? the young republicans would never elect a woman who thought the word "coon" was funny to head their organization would they?

I think it is completely unfair to label the entire Republican Party as a bunch of racists. Are there a small portion of people within the party that are racist? Absolutely...but you cannot label the entire party with one big brush stroke.

Every ideology has their nutjobs.
 
I think it is completely unfair to label the entire Republican Party as a bunch of racists. Are there a small portion of people within the party that are racist? Absolutely...but you cannot label the entire party with one big brush stroke.

Every ideology has their nutjobs.


Exactly.
 
I'm not calling them all racists. but they do seem to cater to them as a party. especially on the local level. you should go down to one of the local meetings here.(Dalton Ga.)
The topic of conversation has been the same for decades. Badmouthing the "colored folk" and Mexicans for everything. I've lived here all my life. They're not bad people. Just prejudiced as hell. But as long as people in the party defend them and condone it then it affects the entire party.
Instead of brushing this stuff off you should be making sure these people lose their positions in the party.
but hey go ahead and keep on keepin on. The country's not getting any whiter.
 
I live in Louisiana and have been to meetings, I have NEVER heard ANY derogatory term said about ANY race used,


well actually.. I did once, it was about a "chocolate city" or something like that... but it wasn't in any meeting.

Everyone was ALWAYS genuine in their wants to better the community as A WHOLE.


I know these people, and this generalized stereotype you have that people from Louisiana and Mississippi and what not are all prejudiced red neck hicks is very insulting. We're also not all republicans, I'm an independent.


The country isn't getting any whiter? what is that supposed to even mean?
 
Last edited:
Coming from a guy who said Hillary Clinton didn't get it as bad as Sarah Palin did? C'mon. You have to be fair here. Bush and Clinton have been put in some ridiculous and offensive images. But that does not detract from the fact that this implies racial prejudices and evokes a racial thought. It is like saying "Barack the magic negro," is just 'funny.' And the racism of that is all 'perspective.'

Ignorance and hateful venom is not new to Obama--or Palin for you Repubplicans out there. We should still call it when it happens, but don't pretend your side is innocent.

Again, show me any instance where Hillary Clinton was portrayed as mentally inferior for her office, depicted as an insult to her gender or where Chelsea was attacked by mainstream sources to the extent that Palin's children were and I will start buying the idea that Hillary was treated the same as Sarah.

The "Barack the Magic Negro" bit was created by an LA Times reporter who was not making a racist point, but merely a point about how Obama and his black candidacy was being used by others. It was, in fact, an anti-racist sentiment.

I am not denying neither ignorance nor venom against Obama. Are there racist opponents of Barack Obama. Is a graphic comparing Obama's healthcare program to voodoo inherently racist just because Obama happens to be black? Absolutely not.

But, I do have to question this. It is an old southern archetype, one that obviously didn't stick into modern times but one a lot of people can find was prominent back in the day if they do some digging. Now, maybe this guy is making a stupid connection between Obama's healthcare plan and voodoo. That's fine I guess, but people should be aware that there are stereotypes out there that offend people. Take a look at that new Disney movie that's coming out. The main villain was a black voodoo sorcerer and people started getting up in arms because of the old stereotype, so the studio changed it to a white guy and I think took out many of the voodoo elements altogether.

Could the guy have picked less inflammatory image than a dark skinned witch doctor? Absolutely. But that doesn't mean the joke was a bad one, that the joke was intended to be racist, nor the man himself was racist.

Most of all, even if this guy attended Klan meetings, this has no business in the "Future of the Republican Party" thread, because this guy has as much to do with the GOP as you do.

I'm not calling them all racists. but they do seem to cater to them as a party. especially on the local level. you should go down to one of the local meetings here.(Dalton Ga.)
The topic of conversation has been the same for decades. Badmouthing the "colored folk" and Mexicans for everything. I've lived here all my life. They're not bad people. Just prejudiced as hell. But as long as people in the party defend them and condone it then it affects the entire party.
Instead of brushing this stuff off you should be making sure these people lose their positions in the party.
but hey go ahead and keep on keepin on. The country's not getting any whiter.

Finding a bunch of racist people in Dalton, Georgia is not quite as hard as you are painting it out to be. I betcha if I went to the local Democratic meeting and started making racist jokes, a few of them would join along.

Racism is no more a Republican issue than it is a Democrat issue. Its an issue of ignorance, intolerance and down right stupidity - all of which do not require party affiliation.
 
I guess pollsters can now save time and lies by just telling the person a racist joke. If they laugh, they are Republican! Hobodeluxe, you need to work in polling! I bet Obama's guys are hiring. He needs skewed polls right about now.
 
I'm not calling them all racists. but they do seem to cater to them as a party. especially on the local level. you should go down to one of the local meetings here.(Dalton Ga.)
The topic of conversation has been the same for decades. Badmouthing the "colored folk" and Mexicans for everything. I've lived here all my life. They're not bad people. Just prejudiced as hell. But as long as people in the party defend them and condone it then it affects the entire party.
Instead of brushing this stuff off you should be making sure these people lose their positions in the party.
but hey go ahead and keep on keepin on. The country's not getting any whiter.
By this statement, I have to wonder. Do you think Barbara Boxer is Racist?
 
I think the joke is the witch doctor part - which isn't meant to be racist, but rather a joke at how preposterous his HEALTH CARE plan his. The focus on both being the use of the word "doctor". People who see that image as racist are those that already have a bias against Republicans and LOOK for examples of racism.

I agree, there are people looking out for they're suscpions to be verifed.

And Republicans, as a whole...should look to not fuel the fire at all.

I mean, is it too much to look at that picture and say, "****...this might be used against me"...or "****, could be seen as racist...delete, do not foward".

Showing better judgement to not put themselves in the situation is called for, I think.

It's not a good look for Obama no, that bone is hideous.

word.

So far:

Gorilla Glue
Voodoo
Witch Doctor
Allusions to crazy face ripping chimpanzee

Not the words, but imagery perhaps?
 
I thought the video was funny. He's doing nothing more than poking a little fun at his image. Why can't people have a sense of humor about a man who has a sense of humor about himself?
 
I like Arnold, so this flap over the video seems pretty stupid to me.

Then again, I can't wait for him to go back to making movies again.
 
PAWLENTY ELECTED RGA VICE CHAIR
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/27/pawlenty-elected-rga-vice-chair/

Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty has been elected as the vice chairman of the Republican Governors Association, the organization announced Monday.

"His firsthand knowledge of how to win in a so-called purple state will be a major asset to the RGA," Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour, the RGA's chairman, said in the statement.

South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford stepped down from his post as the RGA's chairman in the wake of admitting to an extramarital affair. When Sanford's resigned from his RGA leadership post, Barbour ascended from vice chair to chairman, leaving the group's no. 2 spot open until Pawlenty's election.
 
Jim Bunning will not run for re-election in Kentucky's Senate race.

Kentucky Sen. Jim Bunning (R) announced today he will not seek re-election to a third term. The 77-year-old Hall of Fame pitcher had been considered one of the most vulnerable incumbents this year. Little money and tenuous support from party leaders led to much speculation that he would either retire or face a primary defeat.

Bunning announced his decision in a statement released by his Senate office.

"Unfortunately, running for office is not just about the issues," said Bunning. "To win a general election, a candidate has to be able to raise millions of dollars to get the message out to voters. Over the past year, some of the leaders of the Republican Party in the Senate have done everything in their power to dry up my fundraising. The simple fact is that I have not raised the funds necessary to run an effective campaign for the U.S. Senate. For this reason, I will not be a candidate for re-election in 2010."

Bunning had just $600,000 in campaign funds through the second quarter of this year -- a miniscule amount for a statewide campaign. He spent 10 times that in 2004 and won by just 2 points. Stealing away some of his donors has been Secretary of State Trey Grayson (R), who raised $600,000 through his Senate exploratory committee last quarter -- twice Bunning's total.

Grayson is the party favorite, though whomever the eventual GOP nominee is will face stiff competition in the general election. Attorney General Jack Conway (D) outraised the field in the second quarter with more than $1 million. Also running is Lt. Gov. Daniel Mongiardo (D), who lost the close race to Bunning in 2004.
 
Jim Bunning will not run for re-election in Kentucky's Senate race.

Kentucky Sen. Jim Bunning (R) announced today he will not seek re-election to a third term. The 77-year-old Hall of Fame pitcher had been considered one of the most vulnerable incumbents this year. Little money and tenuous support from party leaders led to much speculation that he would either retire or face a primary defeat.

Bunning announced his decision in a statement released by his Senate office.

"Unfortunately, running for office is not just about the issues," said Bunning. "To win a general election, a candidate has to be able to raise millions of dollars to get the message out to voters. Over the past year, some of the leaders of the Republican Party in the Senate have done everything in their power to dry up my fundraising. The simple fact is that I have not raised the funds necessary to run an effective campaign for the U.S. Senate. For this reason, I will not be a candidate for re-election in 2010."

Bunning had just $600,000 in campaign funds through the second quarter of this year -- a miniscule amount for a statewide campaign. He spent 10 times that in 2004 and won by just 2 points. Stealing away some of his donors has been Secretary of State Trey Grayson (R), who raised $600,000 through his Senate exploratory committee last quarter -- twice Bunning's total.

Grayson is the party favorite, though whomever the eventual GOP nominee is will face stiff competition in the general election. Attorney General Jack Conway (D) outraised the field in the second quarter with more than $1 million. Also running is Lt. Gov. Daniel Mongiardo (D), who lost the close race to Bunning in 2004.
 
Funny how that article makes no mention of Ron Paul's son, Rand who is running for Senate as a Republican in Bunning's district, yet it does mention Grayson.
 
Rand Paul has raised a sixth of the money Grayson has though, which was the whole point of mentioning Grayson in the article.
 
You're determined to make sure the White Horse Prophecy is fulfilled, aren't you?
 
Mormon boy would be lucky if he was the VP to Borelenty :woot:

Inoffensive (to party base), 'better than that other candidate' and vanilla predictably will win the day. Republicans are too emasculated to take any real risks with any game changing candidate. This is why Borelenty will take it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,262
Messages
22,074,422
Members
45,876
Latest member
kedenlewis
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"