The Question
Objectivism doesn't work.
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2005
- Messages
- 40,541
- Reaction score
- 30
- Points
- 58
The CW is over now and they are still using psychos like Bullseye and Gobby as agents, are they still desperate?
Some pretty ****ed up individuals have worked for several governments before. It's not new news. And like I said, they were low on manpower and power in general. And the government is notorious for making temporary solutions permanent ones because they're cheap. And really, having people like Bullseye and Osborn working for them is not the worst thing they could do.
Besides can prove that Jack Flag is any sort of public threat or even a threat worse then Bullseye, a mass murdering psycho that the government is allowing to be their agent. If the psychos from the T-bolts ever get off their leashs, seems like unregistered heroes won't that a big deal in comparsion. This whole new T-bolt thing looks like the kinda thing that will blow up in the government's face in the long run. Besides is anyone inthe government going to punished because Bullseye criped Jack or does the MU US government not believe in accountiblity?
Honestly, I don't know. More likely, since they still probably need the likes of Bullseye, they'll simply sweep the whole thing under the rug. Is that the pure, moral stance to take? Hardly. But I don't think it makes them evil.
So what, super villains escape from prison all the time and they still get trials (it was stated in CW that the heroes will be held without trial, until the CW is over). Why does the constitution apply to super villains and not super heroes?
Not comperable. The villains escaping from prison were unrelated incidents. The Anti-Regs were actively busting people out of jail. A normal trial would have undobubtebly resulted in a big ****ing fight in a courthouse. Holding off their trails until all of them were arrested was the government being practical and safe, not immoral.
Besides why is the prison in the Negative Zone, one of the most dangerous places in MU, ruled by a genocidal tyrant who would have wiped the prison out, if he had not been busy elsewhere. It was said in CW that some of the inmates of the 42 commited suicide because the N-Zone was such a terrible place. How is the 42 constitutional or moral on any level?
People commit suicide in regular prison. That doesn't mean it's unconstitutional or immoral. It just means that prison life sucks, which is a given. 42 itself isn't grounds for a moral or legal arguement against the pro-regs. The suspentions of trials until everything was sorted out is, although it's obvious that they have begun to hold trials, so I see that as a non-issue.
Also, we don't know what the security measures in 42 are. They could be well gaurded against the N-Zone natives. Plus, the N-Zone is a universe unto itself. Big place. Plenty of room.
Wanna bet this draft could not have created, if heroes didn't register in the first place. This is why Cap oppossed the SHRA in the first place, because he was afraid that the government would use it as an excuse to turn heroes into their own private goon squad. Looks like cap was right to be afriad.
Wonder Man didn't have a secret identity, and Ares' alias was pretty much comrpomised when he had a shoot out with the cops. Their being drafted may have happened in response to Civil War, but they could have happened without the Act.
Then why is giving himself all the power and control: leadership over SHIELD, the Avengers, all the new hero groups, etc.
One must be apointed to being director of SHEILD. And I do believe he was also apointed head of the Initiative and the Avengers. He didn't give himself that power. He couldn't. He lacks the authority to.
You think its a great idea, good for you, I don't care. I think its a bad idea, I don't like it and because I don't like it, I won't support it and I it hope it crashes and burns.
Why?
I know what Karma is. You just kept calling it "krama."
Unless Stark turns himself in and accepts responsiblity for his actions, the whole program is tainted.
How? They'd still be doing good and making up for the mishandling of Civil War. You can't call for the dissilution of an entire government program that greatly helps the country just because one of the higher ups involved is a dick.
Beesides I think super villains forcing the Initiative to crash into the ground would make a great story.
I don't. It would basically return everything to the old status quo. And I especially hate it when that sort of thing happens.
Notice how Stark has all the power and control though and gets glorify his ego in the process. Example he commished a new helicarrier (to match his own colour scheme) and gave Stark Enterprises the contract to do it. How is that not selfish?
So you're telling me that his entire part in Civil War was to give the hellicarrier a color scheme he liked and to make money? Bull****, I say. He was genuinely trying to do the right thing. He wanted to make America safer. It wasn't about gaining power of wealth. None of his actions or words ever suggest that. He may have handled it poorly, and may have been a dick about it, but he was trying to do the right thing. The color thing is purely asthetic. And having his own company build it was just him making sure it was done by people he felt were the best.
Its great job for a control freak like Stark, who gets to give his company a bunch of no bid contracts. Besides this isn't real lfe, it is escapist fiction, different rules and all. I think it would be better in terms of story telling terms if Stark was forced to pay for his crimes.
And I think it would be cliche, juvinile, and completely illogical. Stark's crimes are nowhere near bad enough to justify getting rid of something that actually helps innocent people. Stark can pay if you want, but the Initiative doesn't have crash and burn with him.