iamlegend
Que es eso?
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2006
- Messages
- 3,712
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Of course, its not the law, but usually a series, a successful one at that, is built around a main character that people invest in and its better for business to keep him around for more stories rather than replacing him with somebody else, which would make the chains of events feel more like spin-offs rather than sequels.
Like I stated, my theory is they didn't bring back the Grey Warden because they wanted to test the waters with a voiceless hero (ala Chrono) so I thought they put in Hawke, somebody easier to connect with, to give a face for the franchise.
But now that they're replacing him too, I find the change of the lead role again totally unnecessary.
Would Mass Effect be just as awesome if Shepard didn't come back after the first game? I HIGHLY doubt it.
You can't really compare the two. Mass Effect was conceived as Shepard's story from day one. Dragon Age is a larger narrative that's more about a series of events than it is any one character. You don't have ME without Shepard. Same doesn't apply for DA.
Meanwhile, you've hit the nail on the head with DA: O - Bioware wasn't really sure quite what they had with it until it blew up. They made what amounted to an ode to older genre games... and it turned into something that they saw a real franchise future in. So it got completely revamped to be a franchise.