I still think Wright's idea for adapting Ant-Man is a good approach to take with the character wether he's involved or not. Just doing another "scientist gets powers, fights villain, gets the girl" movie would be boring as hell. Changing it up, focusing on the legacy aspect, focusing on the "what it means to be a hero" aspect, delving into the heist movie genre, that's a clever and innovative route to take with Ant-Man. Nothing has been sacrificed.
You touch on a really good point here when you bring up the "heist movie genre." What has been one of the MCU's biggest strengths? Its ability to genre-hop. The first Cap film was a boys' own war picture, the sequel was a paranoid 1970s style conspiracy thriller, and GOTG is a sci-fi space opera. The prospect of an Ocean's Eleven style heist caper with superhero trappings could be something new again, though if it takes too much relish in setting up the big score the. That could tie into the rumoured problems with the "morality" of the piece.
That's the greatest strength of superheroes in general. By their very nature they cross multiple genres, and Marvel Studios realized that they could do that with the films instead of just making formulaic dreck. Everyone suggesting that we shift Ant-Man towards a generic origin story is totally missing the point.
The morality thing eh. Disney made Aladdin, I can't imagine a thief hero would be a problem for them.
Fans of comics hated Iron Man 3 because of The Mandarin, but average consumers spend over a billion dollars on it.
Now here's a question everyone is avoiding I have asked this for months. Why should the general public care about this property?? Now before someone uses the why care about the Guardians. Well they have cool trailers.
It's a superhero film about a guy rescuing his kid. That could be an episode of Agents of SHIELD.
No one knows the villain of the film is. Can someone honestly tell me who it is?? Then how do you market the film? From the director of some cult classics come the guy who talks to ants. Give me something to care about. Every MCU I went 1st day. Give me a reason to go see this BESIDES a director!!!
Now here's a question everyone is avoiding I have asked this for months. Why should the general public care about this property?? Now before someone uses the why care about the Guardians. Well they have cool trailers.
It's a superhero film about a guy rescuing his kid. That could be an episode of Agents of SHIELD.
No one knows the villain of the film is. Can someone honestly tell me who it is?? Then how do you market the film? From the director of some cult classics come the guy who talks to ants. Give me something to care about. Every MCU I went 1st day. Give me a reason to go see this BESIDES a director!!!
What's wrong with a story about someone rescuing his kid?![]()
Question one thing I liked about Marvel Studios projects is the villains.
Iron Man had Iron Monger
Hulk had Abomination
Iron Man 2 had Whiplash
Thor had Loki
Cap had Red Skull
Avengers had Loki & Chitauri
Iron Man 3 had ...
Thor 2 had Malekith
Cap 2 had Winter Soldier
GotG has Ronan
Avengers 2 has Ultron
while Ant Man has ????
Im sorry but the notion "disney might not want to handle a thief as a main character" is beyond ridiculous.... disney's gone much darker than that.
That notion is just laughably ignorant
Now here's a question everyone is avoiding I have asked this for months. Why should the general public care about this property?? Now before someone uses the why care about the Guardians. Well they have cool trailers.
It's a superhero film about a guy rescuing his kid. That could be an episode of Agents of SHIELD.
No one knows the villain of the film is. Can someone honestly tell me who it is?? Then how do you market the film? From the director of some cult classics come the guy who talks to ants. Give me something to care about. Every MCU I went 1st day. Give me a reason to go see this BESIDES a director!!!
Question one thing I liked about Marvel Studios projects is the villains.
Iron Man had Iron Monger
Hulk had Abomination
Iron Man 2 had Whiplash
Thor had Loki
Cap had Red Skull
Avengers had Loki & Chitauri
Iron Man 3 had ...
Thor 2 had Malekith
Cap 2 had Winter Soldier
GotG has Ronan
Avengers 2 has Ultron
while Ant Man has ????
I hope they give Pym a cameo where Tony Stark single-handedly invents Ultron and it cuts to Pym saying, "Man, I wish I'd thought of that!"
Question one thing I liked about Marvel Studios projects is the villains.
Iron Man had Iron Monger
Hulk had Abomination
Iron Man 2 had Whiplash
Thor had Loki
Cap had Red Skull
Avengers had Loki & Chitauri
Iron Man 3 had ...
Thor 2 had Malekith
Cap 2 had Winter Soldier
GotG has Ronan
Avengers 2 has Ultron
while Ant Man has ????
Im sorry but the notion "disney might not want to handle a thief as a main character" is beyond ridiculous.... disney's gone much darker than that.
That notion is just laughably ignorant
Now here's a question everyone is avoiding I have asked this for months. Why should the general public care about this property??
You touch on a really good point here when you bring up the "heist movie genre." What has been one of the MCU's biggest strengths? Its ability to genre-hop. The first Cap film was a boys' own war picture, the sequel was a paranoid 1970s style conspiracy thriller, and GOTG is a sci-fi space opera. The prospect of an Ocean's Eleven style heist caper with superhero trappings could be something new again, though if it takes too much relish in setting up the big score the. That could tie into the rumoured problems with the "morality" of the piece.
Question one thing I liked about Marvel Studios projects is the villains.
Iron Man had Iron Monger
Hulk had Abomination
Iron Man 2 had Whiplash
Thor had Loki
Cap had Red Skull
Avengers had Loki & Chitauri
Iron Man 3 had ...
Thor 2 had Malekith
Cap 2 had Winter Soldier
GotG has Ronan
Avengers 2 has Ultron
while Ant Man has ????
redemption was mentioned. but i agree with your point. and maybe it changes in the movie. but Lang was thieving to provide for his child. she's always been the motivation. he's not Felicia Hardy or Gambit; thieving for sport.