Lighthouse
Fairness, Equality, Bacon
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2003
- Messages
- 14,809
- Reaction score
- 2,044
- Points
- 78
I think Tim Apple would agree with him
P-p-p-p-projection!
I think Tim Apple would agree with him
My only regret is he didn't call him Tim Macintosh.Unable to properly deliver a very simple line like “Tim Cook”?
My only regret is he didn't call him Tim Macintosh.
You just explained why it would have been so funny. Trump would of thought himself so smart for knowing the name.I don't think he would know Macintosh. I don't mean any offense, but are people familiar with it as much as say Apple and Mac?
Imagine having almost unlimited potential to do literally everything...and you decide to write/draw a right wing kids book about Donald Trump Propaganda.
Is it THE Woody Allen who finds this "quite funny"? I really would like to hear the story of how Woody Allen got his hands on this book, that seems so random and weird. XD
The Woody Allen quote is about Eric Metaxas. Not the book. Same for the other two quotes.
You mean, KMFDM?
Weird, considering KMFDM stands for Kill Mother F***ing Depeche Mode.Yes and no. They temporarily renamed themselves MDFMK in the early 2000s.
Mode Depeche ****ing Mother Kill.Weird, considering KMFDM stands for Kill Mother F***ing Depeche Mode.
Weird, considering KMFDM stands for Kill Mother F***ing Depeche Mode.
Oh, I love that.That’s not really true; the acronym actually stands for Kein Mehrheit Für Die Mitleid.
The band started saying the Depeche Mode thing as a joke to mess with American journalists who didn’t understand German, lol.
I remember hearing them for the first time in the Mortal Kombat movie. I always intended to follow up on their music but never did.
The Woody Allen quote is about Eric Metaxas. Not the book. Same for the other two quotes.
So apparently designer Tom Ford is trending because he said he refused to dress Melania, who he referred to as a "a glorified escort who steals speeches and has bad taste in men."
Facts don't care about your feelings.That's all pretty much just objective fact.
But multiple polling experts took exception to the structure of the question.
"I'm sorry to say this question violates three basic principles of questionnaire design," said Gary Langer, president of Langer Research Associates, which polls for ABC News and others.
Langer said in an email to CNBC that the question is "triple-barreled" because it asks three things within a single question: whether the probe is a witch hunt; whether Trump has been subjected to more investigations than other presidents; and whether those probes have been lodged because of politics.
"Answers to each can differ," Langer said.
He added that asking respondents if they agree — without asking if they disagree — makes the question "unbalanced." And agree-disagree questions in general are "fundamentally biasing, because they lack the alternative proposition," Langer said.