My guess is the 28 minute preview was indeed chopped up and truncated in places. It seems highly unlikely to me that they wouldn't at the very least firmly establish Jyn's character in the first act of the film.
Or simply directed by Edwards.My guess is the 28 minute preview was indeed chopped up and truncated in places. It seems highly unlikely to me that they wouldn't at the very least firmly establish Jyn's character in the first act of the film.

Quint from AICN also put up a review of the footage. He also somewhat criticizes the pace and performance of Felicity Jones.
Yknow, the thing about Felicity Jones, shes got lifeless eyes, black eyes, like a dolls eyes. When she comes after ya, she doesnt seem to be livin...until she bites ya, and those black eyes roll over white, and then....aww, then you hear that terrible high-pitch screamin, the silver screen turns red, and in spite of all the poundin and the hollerin, the British actresses all come in and rip ya to pieces
Okay I watched those clips. God, they're terrible. And I'm surprised and sad to say this. I'm serious. I did not go in wanting to think that or expect anything less than at worst it being okay or me feeling indifferent. I didn't think I would have a legitimate worrying and bad reaction to it. That Jyn/Cassian ship clip was prequel level baffling bad. "Trust goes both ways."
Wut
I couldn't ****ing believe it. What was that situation? It was just baffling. BAFFLING. I got it. Jyn found a gun and won't give it to Cassian because she's dangerous and unpredictable I guess. But it felt so fake. That was conflict???
The only thing I liked was that action clip with that end gag of the droid. But that music sounded generic. And they REUSED THE SAME EXACT GAG FROM TFA!!!! Man thinks woman is in trouble, but sees woman can take care of herself so man doesn't help, subverting the female character. It was funny the first time with Rey. It sucked in Suicide Squad and it sucks here.
This is the fourth time we're getting a scene where everyone is standing around talking about a Death Star. That feels like such a reshoot. It's so hopeful though! Sure, it feels like cynical corporate meddling but the tone is just so hopeful!
I get context but if they're trying to market this movie to best represent it, they're not doing a good job. I should say, "Wow, what a great clip that stands on its own that gives me a nice picture and gets me excited about the rest of the scene!"
I originally thought we'd get a mediocre movie at worst, but I never thought I'd be worried about the quality now. Is it still a gritty war movie like that first trailer or is it a more hopeful traditional SW film? It feels like it's trying to still be one thing but is going to be another. I sense a Suicide Squad situation.
I'm concerned how people are talking more about Easter Eggs and little details than the story and actual substance. Not if blue milk shows up or if we see a part of Darth Vader's head. I get spoilers, but are they not allowed to even mention at least thoughts on the substantive stuff? When I was looking a couple days ago, I just saw very superficial tweets. Is this what SW means to people?
Okay I watched those clips. God, they're terrible. And I'm surprised and sad to say this. I'm serious. I did not go in wanting to think that or expect anything less than at worst it being okay or me feeling indifferent. I didn't think I would have a legitimate worrying and bad reaction to it. That Jyn/Cassian ship clip was prequel level baffling bad. "Trust goes both ways." [/YT]
Bold words, Jones. Prequel dialogue was unrealistic hyperbole. This is common dialogue in what seems like a melodramatic response. There's a difference - and still you're claim of it being so is dependent on the context around the scene which we don't have.
Clearly you don't understand beats within a scene. That's likely the beginning of a new scene. Dialogue goes back and fourth escalating conflict over itself. You start small and you grow from there - wait for the context.I couldn't ****ing believe it. What was that situation? It was just baffling. BAFFLING. I got it. Jyn found a gun and won't give it to Cassian because she's dangerous and unpredictable I guess. Baffling in terms of what the **** they were thinking. It was so awkward. That was conflict???
TFA and SS were 100% a gender role joke. RO scene looked more like a "oh **** you're outnumbered and outgunned" joke. She had a team of Stormtroopers on her ass there. Way different than the other situations you gave.The only thing I liked was that action clip with that end gag of the droid. But that music sounded generic. And they REUSED THE SAME EXACT GAG FROM TFA!!!! Man thinks woman is in trouble, but sees woman can take care of herself so man doesn't help, subverting the female character. It was funny the first time with Rey. It sucked in Suicide Squad and it sucks here.
This movie's logline is literally about them stealing the plans for the Death Star. I'd give you the argument for TFA for being unoriginal (even when that was a deliberate homage - still one I thought was lazy) but the Rebels learning about the Death Star is the entire plot of this film.This is the fourth time we're getting a scene where everyone is standing around talking about a Death Star. That feels like such a reshoot. It's so hopeful though! Sure, it feels like cynical corporate meddling but the tone is just so hopeful!
Great, so you were against the film to begin with. Suicide Squad looked bad from the get-go. Flashy lights and catchy music didn't fool the more serious movie watchers, while the trailers for Rogue One still don't necessarily sell it one way or the other. Which is a good thing.I originally thought we'd get a mediocre movie at worst, but I never thought I'd be worried about the quality now. Is it still a gritty war movie like that first trailer or is it a more hopeful traditional SW film? It feels like it's trying to still be one thing but is going to be another. I sense a Suicide Squad situation.
That's because easter eggs are the only things we CAN talk about at this point - that and vague, out-of-context dialogue which is apparently "prequel level" writing to you.I'm concerned how people are talking more about Easter Eggs and little details than the story and actual substance. Not if blue milk shows up or if we see a part of Darth Vader's head. I get spoilers, but are they not allowed to even mention at least thoughts on the substantive stuff? When I was looking a couple days ago, I just saw very superficial tweets. Is this what SW means to people?
![]()
apparently in the creatures featurette there is (major spoiler)
a sculpt of a bald human looking figure with a breathing apparatus and no arms or legs in the background with also next to it some concept art of the same thing
visual spoiler below
[YT]qnGXcKQ7rHo[/YT]
Oh hell ya!
Apparently in the creatures featurette there is (Major Spoiler)
A sculpt of a bald human looking figure with a breathing apparatus and no arms or legs in the background with also next to it some concept art of the same thing
Visual Spoiler Below
[YT]3vUXl3aDamg[/YT]

