Which is why I said 'potentially'. There's no concrete evidence and is purely speculative (as far as we know) but it is still something the producers are concerned about. And as it's a multi-million dollar investment (and they probably have researchers on the subject), I would say it's a fair concern.
Ugh whatever. Most of this just seems to come from media hype and the strange Hollywood mindset.
That was then and this is now. The political climate is greatly different, especially after the U.S. invaded Iraq. It's quite possible (though not necessarily certain and backed by evidence that I know of) that a movie featuring a group of purely American soldiers would not get away with traipsing around the world going wherever they please. The belief is that an international group is less offensive since they're 'citizens of the world' kind of thing.
Even in the comics they aren't going where ever they please since they are constantly working under the threat of the enemy and danger.
I don't see why people would be less offended by an international group going where ever the hell they want and doing as they please by your own logic. None of it makes any sense.
Also, the JOES have ALWAYS been a diverse group.
How so, specifically within G.I. Joe or Paramount within recent years?
Within GI JOE.
I agree. Personally, I wouldn't be too offended by it. However, there will be individuals and social/political groups who will be. And there will be troublemakers out there who will make a huge fuss regardless whether they personally feel that way on the topic just to feed the flames. Evidence of this can be seen in the various 'less than objective' online reports regarding the decision to make G.I. Joe an international group despite having little details on the issue beyond the fact.
This is just arrogant paranoia on your part. Any individuals or whoever complains would be an extreme minority that few will actually care about. These people are the film scholars that consider Back To The Future to be racist, pro-white middle American, and pro neo-con Ronald Reagan propaganda.
Or the people who call Dirty Harry fascist which is the farthest thing from the truth.
Actually, the Sigma Six line was initially successful but recent sales have drastically declined. So much so that Hasbro has currently placed the entire 8-inch line on hiatus creatively with no plans on continuation beyond the currently planned waves, at least for the time being.
At press time, it was reported in the latest issue of TOYFARE MAGAZINE they ARE continuing with the 8-inch line, it is simply no longer being called Sigma Six since the TV series which was on for two seasons is now over. And the Sigma Six line was the best anything under GI JOE has sold in YEARS according to Hasbro.
So they went to re-branding GI JOE as Sigma Six which was a big success which they phased into the 25th Anniversary series which is also very successful currently.
Again, this is not entirely accurate. For a long time (about a decade or so), G.I. Joe was not a commercially viable line and existed only as a direct-to-consumer product through Hasbro without the use of new sculpts and weren't available at retail to the average kid. Hence, at least for Hasbro and pop culture, it isn't a complete success.[/QUOTE]