SuperFerret
King of the Urban Jungle
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2004
- Messages
- 33,639
- Reaction score
- 6
- Points
- 58
But ARE the characters the weakest aspect?
But ARE the characters the weakest aspect?
Boy, this is the TASM2 threads all over again. Or any other movie's come release time, for that matter. This and TASM2 are the first movies in which I've stayed tuned for reviews and fan reactions and stuff... usually I completely skip this part. For good reason.![]()
Basically its not very fun. That seems to be the downful. Same nonsensical issue critics had with MoS.
That's probably a matter of opinion really. That clip alone of Joe Brody being questioned shows acting & writing qualities that aren't usually witnessed in blockbusters. It's only a clip yeah, and some of the other tidbits of character stuff look good, it's probably that ultimately, it will focus on the MUTOs, Godzilla & the destruction aspect.
well that's a good thing, imo.
this is supposed to be a more serious take on the monster movie. imagining how the world would react if said monsters really existed.
I think when people say it's not fun its because the movie does a really great job of building up to these big fights and then Lucy pulls the football away right as Charlie Brown is about to punt. So by the time the fights finally do happen, the movie has already let you down in a big way, twice.
I think right now fans are too caught up in the "This is the Hollywood Godzilla movie I always wanted hype" before they are brought back down to earth. Fans are being overprotective and not willing to accept that while yes this movie is good, it is also flawed.
I mean I like Man of Steel as well, but it's still a very flawed movie.
I think when people say it's not fun its because the movie does a really great job of building up to these big fights and then Lucy pulls the football away right as Charlie Brown is about to punt. So by the time the fights finally do happen, the movie has already let you down in a big way, twice.
I think right now fans are too caught up in the "This is the Hollywood Godzilla movie I always wanted hype" before they are brought back down to earth. Fans are being overprotective and not willing to accept that while yes this movie is good, it is also flawed.
I mean I like Man of Steel as well, but it's still a very flawed movie.
Were the Mutos a good part of the film? From the trailers it seemed to me like the film would be more interesting if it only had Godzilla as the main monster.
That's exactly what it is though. They tease you bad.Oh Gareth, you tease
![]()
This is generally why I stopped watching trailers. Expectations rise due to the random sequencing of events coupled with the right music at the right time. When you finally watch the movie, it barely resembles your assumptions from the trailer. Now this isn't the case all the time, but I'd rather avoid a trailer and go in blind than have a movie underwhelm me.I never do base anything much on early reviews other than certain aspects that mean a lot to me such as good character work. The only reason I'm a little shocked is that even the good reviews complain that Taylor is wooden and the acting is less than stellar from great actors.
I'm still just as excited as I was but I may admit maybe I let the trailers influence what I thought the film would be too much.
Going by what Edwards said, he wanted to save everything until the final act and didn't want to get too caught up in just throwing lots of visuals at once. He described it as not wanting to be "seduced" by the temptations of the CGI and visual effects.That's very discouraging and in line with other things I've read regarding it cutting out at the good parts. I don't know if it was budget or pacing but that's just plain not cool.
This doesn't seem to be getting the same ammount of negativity Amazing Spider-Man 2 got, i just hope this film is more like the 89 Batman, which also had insane hype and was going to be a cinematic event, but got a mixed reaction by the critics.
This is generally why I stopped watching trailers. Expectations rise due to the random sequencing of events coupled with the right music at the right time. When you finally watch the movie, it barely resembles your assumptions from the trailer. Now this isn't the case all the time, but I'd rather avoid a trailer and go in blind than have a movie underwhelm me.
Going by what Edwards said, he wanted to save everything until the final act and didn't want to get too caught up in just throwing lots of visuals at once. He described it as not wanting to be "seduced" by the temptations of the CGI and visual effects.
So if you believe him, he was coming from an arguably noble and sensible place from his perspective...I just differ on his view and how he decided to execute it.
Sounds like it was a choice I just don't agree with then. As I said a few pages back, I hate being teased. It's one thing to tease Godzilla himself but to tease actual set pieces and not deliver on them, sounds incredibly frustrating to watch.
I think it's a valid complaint. This isn't really the movie this was sold. It's not "The Terror of Godzilla" and there is a sort of disconnect with the destruction throughout the movie.
I think you need to not be so sensitive, especially considering you haven't seen the movie yet.