Godzilla is relatively new director Gareth Edwards' take on the classic Japanese monster, with the benefit of modern Hollywood's money and special effects prowess. The movie starts with an attack on a Japanese Nuclear plant in the late 1990s, that may or may not be due to Godzilla. The movie then fast forwards fifteen years as similar seismological "tremors" are felt, with different groups in the military struggling to interpret them. They eventually converge of an understanding: there are some monsters in the world ("Mutos") and Godzilla is an alpha-monster that hunts them down. In this case we have two Mutos meeting near San Francisco to mate, and Godzilla is joining them to attack them. The military wants to use a nuke to blow up the monsters, but the nuke gets intercepted by the monsters (who feed on nuclear energy) and thus the military has to scramble to get the nuke out of San Francisco. The movie ends with a huge, extended fight between Godzilla and the two Mutos, with humans like Aaron Taylor-Johnson interspersed either as military trying to get the nuke away, military trying to shoot down the monsters in an impotent manner, or human beings like Elizabeth Olsen trying to find shelter.
I have mixed feelings on this movie. On the one hand, it had some cool monster fights, it had a positive (albeit heavy-handed and shallow) environmental message, and Elizabeth Olsen is really pretty to look at (though she doesn't contribute to the plot of the film and could have been removed in whole). On the other hand, the first act was really heavy-handed, there was a lot of annoying exposition particularly by the Japanese guy, and the whole second act was boring and I had trouble stating awake. Bryan Cranston's character at the start is the cliche of the man-against-the-system railer fighting the heroic struggle to protect his family and let out the truth, he bored me.
For example, it's established at one point that there is a male muto and a female muto. OK. It is then established that they are converging towards each other geographically. OK. It is then ... stated that this is being done for mating purposes ... Jesus, is that additional line actually necessary? There is a male and a female and they are moving towards each other, you don't need to tell us that this is being done to reproduce, we can infer the purpose. When the monsters meet later on, they show the monsters meeting, but they don't show them having sex, which could have been fun.
One clever moment I'll point out in the movie, right after the movie cuts out of a scene that is a monster fight, we zoom in to a kid's room (the kid of Johnson and Olsen), and we see his dinosaur toys, I thought that was a nice and smooth transition, since Godzilla is kind of like a dinosaur. He then sees reports of the monster fight in Hawaii on the news, and he tells his mom "look, Dinosaurs", her facial expression changes, because her husband was passing through Hawaii so she is afraid for him.
What saves this film (for me) are the monster fights at the end of the movie. But I'm someone who enjoyed ... Alien vs Predator, and T-Rex vs King Kong in King Kong, and Freddy vs Jason ... I like monster fights, but most people don't care for them, and it's not as though the monster fights in this movie are any better. This wasn't as cool as T-Rex versus King Kong in Peter Jackson's King Kong, the abilities were not as well-defined and some came out of nowhere, and actually the monsters came out of nowhere in some circumstances leading to a cheap shock. At one point, Godzilla uses a blue fire breath that is very effective, yet for some reason had not shown up at all earlier in the film when it would have been useful ... very confusing.
I thought the score was manipulative in trying to force a mood, but the assault of music is a general problem with Hollywood movies. I wonder if most movies would draw completely blank reactions from audiences if the score was turned off.
The monster fight in King Kong also took place during the day, unlike the fights in Godzilla and Pacific Rim, which were at night which made it hard to follow, which the directors probably thought made the monsters scarier. I think Del Toro and Edwards might have read about Jaws in film school, which is said to be a great movie because you don't directly see the shark for most of the movie which makes him scarier. OK -- that worked for Jaws, which came out in 1975. That trick has been used a lot in the past 39 years, it's probably not that great of a trick anymore, let's move on.
I have one question about the plot: At the end, when the larger female Muto is closing in on the nuclear weapon, Godzilla comes and kills the larger muto. But we had just seen Godzilla collapse unconsciously below an office tower he destroyed, and in the next day Godzilla wakes up below that rubble, half of San Francisco removed from the docks. So, was it a separate Godzilla who killed the larger muto? I don't know, I think so.
A positive note: they didn't end the movie by showing us that some other monster had survived as a cheap cliffhanger to create artificial suspense and trepidation for a sequel, which we've all seen many times before. They ended the movie with the world ready to move on from the monster fights, and Godzilla being declared a hero for beating up the other monsters.